Advertisement

Communicative and Cultural Memory

  • Jan AssmannEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Knowledge and Space book series (KNAS, volume 4)

Abstract

Like consciousness and language, human memory is acquired through communication, socialization, and acculturation. It is, therefore, about both one’s brain and one’s social and cultural relations and comprises three dimensions: the personal, social, and cultural. Human memory is “embodied” in living personal memories and “embedded” in social frames and external cultural symbols (e.g., texts, images, and rituals) that can be acknowledged as a memory function insofar as they are related to the self-image or “identity” of a tribal, national, and/or religious community. Whereas the social or “collective” memory comprises knowledge commonly shared by a given society in a given epoch, cultural memory in literate societies includes not only a “canon” of normative knowledge but also an “archive” of apocryphal material that may be rediscovered and brought to the fore in later epochs. The formation of a canon of “classical” or sacred texts requires techniques of interpretation to keep accessible the meaning of the texts that may no longer be altered or multiplied. At that stage of cultural evolution, cultural memory changes from ritual to textual continuity. Cultural memory becomes complex, splitting into the “classical” and the “modern,” the “sacred” and the “secular.”

Keywords

Human Memory Collective Memory Personal Memory World Religion Remote Past 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Assmann, A. (1999). Erinnerungsräume: Formen und Wandlungen des kulturellen Gedächtnisses [Commemorative spaces: Forms of and changes of cultural memory]. Munich: C. H. Beck.Google Scholar
  2. Assmann, A. (2006). Memory, individual and collective. In R. E. Goodin & C. Tilly (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of contextual political analysis (pp. 210–224). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Assmann, A., & Assmann, J. (1989). Schrift, Tradition, Kultur [Writing, tradition, culture]. In P. Goetsch, W. Raible, & H.-R. Roemer (Series Eds.) & W. Raible (Vol. Ed.), Scriptoralia: Vol. 6. Zwischen Festtag und Alltag (pp. 25–49). Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
  4. Assmann, J. (1988). Kollektives Gedächtnis und kulturelle Identität [Collective memory and cultural identity]. In J. Assmann & T. Hölscher (Eds.), Kultur und Gedächtnis (pp. 9–19). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  5. Assmann, J. (1992). Das kulturelle Gedächtnis. Schrift, Erinnerung und politische Identität in frühen Hochkulturen [Cultural memory: Writing, remembrance, and political identity in ancient civilizations]. Munich: C. H. Beck.Google Scholar
  6. Assmann, J. (2001). Five steps of canonization: Tradition, scripture and the origin of the Hebrew Bible. In A. Neuwirth & A. Plitsch (Eds.), Crisis and memory in Islamic societies (pp. 75–93). Würzburg: Ergon.Google Scholar
  7. Assmann, J. (2006a). Religion and cultural memory: Ten studies. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Assmann, J. (2006b). Thomas Mann und Ägypten. Mythos und Monotheismus in den Josephsromanen [Thomas Mann and Egypt: Mythos and monotheism in the Joseph novels]. Munich: C. H. Beck.Google Scholar
  9. Borgeaud, P. (1988). Pour une approche anthropologique de la mémoire religieuse [Toward an anthropological approach to religious memory]. In P. Borgeaud (Ed.), La mémoire des religions (pp. 7–20). Geneva: Labor et Fides.Google Scholar
  10. Curtius, E. R. (1948). Europäische Literatur und lateinisches Mittelalter [European literature and Latin middle ages]. Bern: Francke.Google Scholar
  11. Flavius, J. (1738). Contra Apionem [Against Apion] (W. Warburton, Trans.). London: F. Gyles.Google Scholar
  12. Flavius, J. (1993). Kleinere Schriften [Short writings] (H. Clementz, Trans. & Ed.). Wiesbaden: Fournier. (Original translation published 1901)Google Scholar
  13. Fowden, G. (1993). The Egyptian Hermes: A historical approach to the late pagan mind. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Freud, S. (1953–1974). In J. Strachey, A. Freud, A. Richards, & C. L. Rothgeb (Eds.), The standard edition of the complete works of Sigmund Freud (24 vols.). London: The Hogarth Press and the Institute of Psychoanalysis.Google Scholar
  15. Ginzburg, C. (1983). Kunst und soziales Gedächtnis. Die Warburg-Tradition [Art and social memory: The Warburg tradition]. In C. Ginzburg (Ed.), Spurensicherungen. Über verborgene Geschichte, Kunst und soziales Gedächtnis (pp. 115–172). Berlin: Wagenbach.Google Scholar
  16. Gombrich, E. H. (1981). Aby Warburg. Eine intellektuelle Biographie [Aby Warburg: An intellectual biography]. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  17. Halbwachs, M. (1941). La topographie légendaire des évangiles en Terre Sainte [The legendary topography of the gospels in the Holy Land]. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
  18. Halbwachs, M. (1985). Das Gedächtnis und seine sozialen Rahmenbedingungen [Les cadres sociaux de la mémoire] (L. Geldsetzer, Trans.). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. (Original work published 1925)Google Scholar
  19. Jung, C. G. (1970–1971). Collected Works (G. Adler & R. F. C. Hull, Eds.). 20 vols. Bollingen series. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Luckmann, T. (1983). Remarks on personal identity—Inner, social and historical time. In A. Jacobson-Widding (Ed.), Identity: Personal and sociocultural—A symposium (pp. 67–91). Stockholm and Uppsala: Almqvist-Wiksell International.Google Scholar
  21. Mann, T. (1933–1943). Joseph und seine Brüder [Joeseph and his brethren] (4 vols.). Frankfurt am Main (1933–1936) & Stockholm (1943): S. Fischer.Google Scholar
  22. Niethammer, L. (1985). Lebenserfahrung und kollektives Gedächtnis. Die Praxis der “Oral History” [Life experience and collective memory: The practice of “oral history”]. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  23. Nietzsche, F. (1960). Vom Nutzen und Nachteil der Historie für das Leben [Of the advantage and disadvantage of history for life]. In K. Schlechta (Ed.), Werke (pp. 209–285). Munich: C. Hanser. (Original work published 1874)Google Scholar
  24. Plato (1901a). Phaedrus. Platonis (Opera Ed., I. Burnet, Trans.). (St. III, Vol. 2, pp. 227–278). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Plato (1901b). Letter VII, Platonis (Opera Ed., I. Burnet, Trans.). (St. III, Vol. 5, pp. 323d–351). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Proust, M. (1982). Remembrance of things past: Vol 1. Swann’s way: Within a budding grove (T. Kilmartin & C. K. Scott-Moncrieff, Trans.). New York: Knopf. (Original work published 1913)Google Scholar
  27. Redfield, R. (1956). Peasant society and culture. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Vansina, J. (1985). Oral tradition as history. Madison, WI: Wisconsin University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Vosskamp, W. (Ed.). (1993). Klassik im Vergleich. Normativität und Historizität europäischer Klassiken [Classics compared: Normativity and historicity of European classics]. Stuttgart: Metzler.Google Scholar
  30. Warburg, A. (2003). In M. Warnke (Ed.), Der Bilderatlas MNEMOSYNE [Mnemosyne: An illustrated atlas] (2nd ed.). Berlin: Akademie-Verlag. (Original work published 1925)Google Scholar
  31. Yerushalmi, Y. H. (1982). Zakhor: Jewish history and Jewish memory. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EgyptologyHeidelberg UniversityHeidelbergGermany

Personalised recommendations