Advertisement

Negotiated Ethnography: The Possibilities for Practice

  • Debra HayesEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Methodos Series book series (METH, volume 9)

Abstract

It is difficult to improve pedagogical and leadership practices in schools, particularly in settings where there are high levels of poverty and difference. This chapter describes a type of ethnography developed in such contexts that is designed to serve both a research purpose, and to be useful to participants by providing feedback on their collective practice and its effects. This type of research involves the participants in the identification and collection of useful data, as well as its analysis. The iterative and ongoing nature of the field work is illustrated and discussed in terms of its particular suitability to challenging contexts. Central to the paper is an analysis of the possibility of this negotiated ethnographic endeavour, which takes the form of sustained critical conversations, to influence that which it sets out to describe - practice.

Keywords

Cash Flow Leadership Team Cultural Capital Leadership Practice School Organisation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Bascia, N., & Hargreaves, A. (2000). Teaching and leading on the sharp edge of change. In N. Bascia & A. Hargreaves (Eds.), The sharp edge of educational change: Teaching, leading and the realities of reform. London: Routledge Falmer.Google Scholar
  2. Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Westport, CT: Greenwood.Google Scholar
  3. Connell, R. W., Ashenden, D. J., Kessler, S., & Dowsett, G. W. (1982). Making the difference: Schools, families and social division. Sydney, NSW: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  4. Erickson, K., & Sull, D. (1998). Doing team ethnography: Vol. 42. Qualitative research methods series. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication.Google Scholar
  5. Forsey, M. (2007). Challenging the system? A dramatic tale of neoliberal reform in an Australian high school. Charlotte, NC: IAP-Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  6. Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (1995). Ethnography: Principles in practice (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Hayes, D. (2006). Telling stories: Sustaining improvement in schools operating under adverse conditions. Improving Schools, 9(3), 203–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hayes, D., Johnston, K., & King, A. (2009). Creating enabling classroom practices in high poverty contexts: The disruptive possibilities of looking in classrooms. Pedagogy Culture and Society, 17(3), 251–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hill, P. W. (1998). Shaking the foundations: Research driven school reform. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 9(4), 419–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hopkins, D., & Reynolds, D. (2001). The past, present and future of school improvement: Towards the Third Age. British Educational Research Journal, 27(4), 459–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Knapp, M., Shields, P., &Turnbull, B. (1995). Academic challenge in high poverty classrooms. Phi Delta Kappan, 76, 770–776.Google Scholar
  12. Lareau, A. (2003). Unequal childhoods: Class, race, and family . Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  13. Levin, B. (2006). Schools in challenging circumstances: A reflection on what we know and what we need to know. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 17(4), 399–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lewis, O. (1959). Five families: Mexican case studies in the culture of poverty. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  15. Lingard, B., Hayes, D., Mills, M., & Christie, P. (2003). Leading learning: Making hope practical in schools. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Lupton, R. (2005). Social justice and school improvement: Improving the quality of schooling in the poorest neighbourhoods. British Educational Research Journal, 31(5), 589–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Marinosson, G. L. (2007). The ocean merges into the drop: Unearthing the ground rules for the social construction of pupil diversity. Methodological Developments in Ethnography Studies in educational ethnography, 12, 185–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Marzano, R. J. (2003). What works in schools: Translating research into action. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar
  19. Rohatynskyj, M., & Jaarsma, S. R. (Eds.). (2000). Ethnographic artifacts: Challenges to a reflexive anthropology. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
  20. Sammons, P., Hillman, J., & Mortimore, P. (1995). Key characteristics of effective schools: A review of school effectiveness research. London: Office for Standards in Education.Google Scholar
  21. Sizer, T. (1992). Horace’s compromise. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company.Google Scholar
  22. Slee, R., Weiner, G., & Tomlinson, S. (1998). School effectiveness for whom? London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  23. Smith, D. E. (2005). Institutional ethnography: A sociology for people. Walnut Creek, CA: Attamira Press.Google Scholar
  24. Teese, R. (2006). Condemned to innovate. Getting smart: The battle for ideas in education The Griffith Review. Autumn, 11, 149–159.Google Scholar
  25. Thrupp, M. (1999). Schools making a difference: Let’s be realistic!: School mix, school effectiveness, and the social limits of reform. Buckingham, England, Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Walford, G. (2002). Why don’t researchers name their research sites? Debates and Developments in Ethnographic Methodology, 6, 95–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Willis, P., & Trondman, M. (2000). Manifesto for ethnography. Ethnography, 1(1), 5–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Education and Social WorkThe University of SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations