Advertisement

Design-Based Research

  • Peter ReimannEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Methodos Series book series (METH, volume 9)

Abstract

Design-based research, with the design experiment as its main practical method, can be characterised as an inter-disciplinary ‘mixed-method’ research approach conducted ‘in the field’ that serves applied as well as theory-building purposes. Substantial progress has been made over recent years in articulating the methodological and epistemological basis for design-based research and in developing it into a teachable method. This chapter delineates these lines of development and provides a short overview of how a prototypical design study is conducted. It identifies and problematises the notions of design and design methods arguing that they need further conceptual development and integration with the methodological foundation.

Keywords

Instructional Design Lesson Study Learning Design Authentic Setting Design Notation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Abell, P. (2004). Narrative explanations: An alternative to variable-centered explanation? Annual Review of Sociology, 30, 287–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bannan-Ritland, B. (2008). Teacher Design Research. An emerging paradigm for teachers’ professional development. In A. E. Kelly, R. A. Lesh, & J. Y. Baek (Eds.), Handbook of design research methods in education (pp. 246–262). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Barab, S. A., Baek, E.-O., Schatz, S., Scheckler, R., & Moore, J. (2008). Illuminating the braids of change in a web-supported community. In A. E. Kelly, R. A. Lesh, & J. Y. Baek (Eds.), Handbook of design research methods in education (pp. 320–352). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Barab, S. A., & Squire, K. (2004). Design-based research: Putting a stake in the ground. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. C. (Eds.). (2000). How People learn: Brain, mind, experience and school. Washington DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bransford, J. D., Sherwood, R. D., Hasselbring, T. S., Kinzer, C. K., & Willams, S. M. (1990). Anchored Instruction: Why we need It and how technology can help. In D. Nix & R. J. Spiro (Eds.),Cognition, education, and multimedia: Exploring ideas in high technology (pp. 115–142). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers.Google Scholar
  7. Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 141–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cobb, P., & Gravemeijer, K. (2008). Experimenting to support and understand learning processes. In A. E. Kelly, R. A. Lesh & J. Y. Baek (Eds.), Handbook of design research methods in education (pp. 68–95). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Cohen, D. K., Raudenbush, S. W., & Loewenberg Ball, D. (2003). Resources, instruction, and research. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25(2), 119–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Collins, A. (1992). Toward a design science of education. In E. Scanlon & T. O’Shea (Eds.), New directions in educational technology. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  11. Confrey, J. (2006). The evolution of design studies as methodology. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 135–152). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Crawford, V. M., Schlager, M. S., Penuel, W. R., & Toyama, Y. (2008). Supporting the art of teaching in a data-rich, high-performance learning environment. In E. B. Mandinach & M. Honey (Eds.), Data-driven school improvement (pp. 109–129). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  13. Dick, W., & Carey, L. (1996). The systematic design of instruction (4th ed.). New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  14. Edelson, D. C. (2002). Design research: What we learn when we engage in design. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11(1), 105–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fishman, B., Marx, R. W., Blumenfeld, P., Krajcik, J., & Soloway, E. (2004). Creating a framework for research on systemic technology innovations. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 43–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  17. Goodyear, P., & Retalis, S. (Eds.). (2010). Technology-enhanced learning: design patterns and pattern languages. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  18. Greeno, J. G. (1998). The situativity of knowing, learning, and research. American Psychologist, 53, 5–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hempel, C. G., & Oppenheim, P. (1948). Studies in the logic of explanation. Philosophy of Science, 15, 135–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jacobson, M. J., & Reimann, P. (Eds.). (2010). Designs for learning environments of the future. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  21. Kelly, A. E. (2003). Theme issue: The role of design in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 3–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kelly, A. E. (2004). Design research in education: Yes, but is it methodological? The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 115–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kelly, A. E., Lesh, R. A., & Baek, J. Y. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of design research methods in education. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Koper, R. (2005). An introduction to learning design. In R. Koper & C. Tattersall (Eds.), Learning design. A handbook on modelling and delivering networked education and training (pp. 3–20). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  25. Koper, R., & Tattersall, C. (Eds.). (2005). Learning design. A handbook on modelling and delivering networked education and training. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  26. Lesh, R. A., Kelly, A. E., & Yoon, C. (2008). Multitiered design experiments in mathematics, science, and technology education. In A. E. Kelly, R. A. Lesh, & J. Y. Baek (Eds.), Handbook of design research methods in education (pp. 131–148). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Linn, M. C., Davis, E. A., & Bell, P. L. (2004). Internet environments for science education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  28. Mandinach, E. B., & Honey, M. (Eds.). (2008). Data-driven school improvement. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  29. Markauskaite, L., & Reimann, P. (2008). Enhancing and scaling-up design-based research: The potential of e-research. Paper presented at the International Learning Science Conference - ICLS 2008, Utrecht, The Netherlands Retrieved July 24–28, 2008, from http://www.fi.uu.nl/en/icls2008/343/paper343.pdf
  30. Maxwell, J. A. (2004). Causal explanation, qualitative research, and scientific inquiry in education. Educational Researcher, 33(2), 3–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  32. Mohr, L. (1982). Explaining organizational behavior. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  33. National Research Council. (2002). Scientific research in education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  34. Piaget, J. (1976). The child’s conception of the world. Totowa, NJ: Littlefield, Adams, & Co.Google Scholar
  35. Reigeluth, C. M. (Ed.). (1999). Instructional-Design Theories and Models. (Vol. II). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  36. Reimann, P. (2009). Time is precious: Variable- and event-centred approaches to process analysis in CSCL research. International Journal of Computer-supported Collaborative Learning, 4, 239–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Roschelle, J., Knudsen, J., & Hegedus, S. (2010). From new technological infrastructures to curricular activity systems: Advanced designs for teaching and learning. In M. J. Jacobson & P. Reimann (Eds.), Designs for learning environments of the future. (pp. 233–263) New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rothkopf, E. Z. (2008). Reflections on the field: Aspirations of learning science and the practical logic of instructional enterprises. Educational Psychology Review, 20, 351–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Salomon, G. (1993). Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations. Cambridge, England: Cambride University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Sandoval, W. A., & Bell, P. (2004). Design-based research methods for studying learning in context: introduction. Educational Psychologist, 39(4), 199–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sawyer, R. K. (Ed.). (2006). The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences. New York: Cambride University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Sayer, A. (1992). Method in social science: A realist approach (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  43. Schank, R., Fano, A., Bell, B., & Jona, M. (1994). The Design of Goal-Based Scenarios,The Journal of the Learning Sciences. 3(4), 305–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Steffe, L. P. (1991). The constructivist teaching experiment: Illustrations and implications. In E. von Glasersfeld (Ed.), Radical constructivism in mathematics education (pp. 177–194). Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  45. The Design-based Research Collective. (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 5–8.Google Scholar
  46. van den Akker, J. (1999). Principles and methods of development research. In J. van den Akker, N. Nieveen, R. M. Branch, K. L. Gustafson, & T. Plomp (Eds.), Design methodology and development research in education and training (pp. 1–14). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  47. Wang, F., & Hannafin, M. (2005). Design-based research and technology-enhanced learning environments. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 53(4), 5–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Education and Social WorkResearch Centre for Computer-supported Learning and Cognition (CoCo), The University of SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations