Abstract
Negotiated ethnographic research in schools serving economically disadvantaged and culturally diverse communities has a dual purpose. Firstly, it uncovers the frameworks of meaning and the social and educational practices that create and sustain patterns of inequality in student participation and learning. Secondly, at the same time, the researchers work collaboratively with the research subjects (students, teachers, and principals) to change the institutional practices that hinder or diminish the quality of learning made available to the students. This chapter brings to light some of the complexities that arise when the researcher blends the roles of research and professional development. It explores the tensions that arise in the course of research, and the institutional resistances that arise within these very difficult school settings to insulate and reduce the process of school change. The chapter suggests several methodological and theoretical reformulations to the negotiated ethnographic approach that might help overcome some of these difficulties.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
For more details about action research, see Chapter 5 (Groundwater-Smith & Irwin, this volume).
- 2.
Yrjo Engestrom and his colleagues at the University of Helsinki have developed an extensive research program. A full bibliography of their work is available on the website of the Centre for Research on Activity, Development and Learning: http://www.helsinki.fi/cradle/index.htm.
References
Bourdieu, P. (2003). Firing back: Against the tyranny of the market 2. London: Verso.
Connell, R. W. (1982). Making the difference: Schools, families and social division. Sydney NSW: George Allen & Unwin.
Engestrom, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Towards an activity-theoretical reconceptualisation. Journal of Education and Work, 14, 133–156.
Engestrom, Y. (2004). New Forms of Learning in co-configuration work. Journal of Workplace Learning, 16, 11–21.
Goffman, E. (1961). Asylums. Anchor Books, Doubleday & Co.
Hayes, D., Johnston, K., & King, A. (2009). Creating enabling classroom practices in high poverty contexts: The disruptive possibilities of looking in classrooms. Pedagogy Culture and Society, 17(3), 251–264.
Skeggs, B. (2001). Feminist ethnography. In P. Atkinson, A. Coffey, J. Delamont, J. Lofland, & L. Lofland (Eds.), Handbook of Ethnography (pp. 426–442). NewYork: Routledge.
Snow, D. Morrill, C., & Anderson, L. (2003). Elaborating analytic ethnography: Linking fieldwork and theory. Ethnography, 4(2), 181–200.
Thomas, J. (1993). Doing critical ethnography. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Willis, P. (1977). Learning to labour. Farnborough: Saxon House.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Johnston, K. (2011). Provoking Change – The Role of Research in Institutional Learning and Organisational Change . In: Markauskaite, L., Freebody, P., Irwin, J. (eds) Methodological Choice and Design. Methodos Series, vol 9. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8933-5_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8933-5_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-8932-8
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-8933-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)