Agent-Based Modelling of Residential Mobility, Housing Choice and Regeneration

Chapter

Abstract

Dynamics in the housing market can be simulated using agent-based modelling. Focusing on the theme of urban regeneration, we present a housing market model framework which explores the causal relationships that occur in this market.

Notes

Acknowledgements

Census output is Crown copyright and is reproduced with the permission of the Controller of HMSO and the Queen’s Printer for Scotland.

References

  1. Aguilera, A., & Ugalde, E. (2007). A spatially extended model for residential segregation. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society. doi: 10.1155/2007/48589.
  2. Benenson, I. (2004). Agent-based modeling: From individual residential choice to urban residential dynamics. In M. F. Goodchild & D. G. Janelle (Eds.), Spatially integrated social science: Examples in best practice (pp. 67–95). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Black, S. (1999). Do better schools matter? Parental valuation of elementary education. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114, 578–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blau, J. (2000). Group enmity and accord: The commercial press in three American cities. Social Science History, 24(2), 395–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boehm, T. (1982). A hierarchical model of housing choice. Urban Studies, 19(1), 17–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Böheim, R., & Taylor, M. P. (1999). Residential mobility, housing tenure and the labour market in Britain (ILR working papers 035). London: Institute for Labour Research.Google Scholar
  7. Bridge, G. (2002). The neighbourhood and social networks (Centre for Neighbourhood Research, Paper, 4). CNR: London.Google Scholar
  8. CCSR (The Cathie Marsh Centre for Census and Survey Research). (2010). The Samples of Anonymised Records (SARS) [online]. Accessed June 8, 2010. Available from http://www.ccsr.ac.uk/sars/2001/hhold/variables/
  9. Cho, Y. (2004). Who moves and where? A comparison of housing association tenants in London and northern regions. In Housing corporation sector studies 40. London: Housing Corporation.Google Scholar
  10. Cho, Y., Lyall Grant, F., & Whitehead, C. (2004). Affordable housing in London: Who expects to move and where? In Housing Corporation Sector Studies 39. London: Housing Corporation.Google Scholar
  11. Dieleman, F. (2001). Modelling residential mobility: A review of recent trends in research. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 16(3), 249–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gibbons, S., & Machin, S. (2003). Valuing English primary schools. Journal of Urban Economics, 53, 197–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gjessing, M. (2009). Interview with René Jordan. December 11, 2009. Leeds.Google Scholar
  14. Johnston, R. J., Poulsen, M. F., & Forrest, J. (2002). Are there ethnic enclaves/ghettos in English cities? Urban Studies, 39, 591–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jordan, R., Birkin, M., & Evans, A. (2011). Agent-based simulation modelling of housing choice and urban regeneration policy. In T. Bosse, A. Geller, & C. Jonker (Eds.), Multi-agent-based simulation XI (pp. 152–166). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kim, J., Pagliara, F., & Preston, J. (2005). The intention to move and residential location choice behaviour. Urban Studies, 42(9), 1621–1636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Laurie, A., & Jaggi, N. (2003). The role of ‘vision’ in neighbourhood racial segregation: A variant of the Schelling segregation model. Urban Studies, 40(13), 2687–2704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Leeds City Council. (2007). East and south east Leeds area action plan: Leeds local development framework. Leeds: Leeds City Council.Google Scholar
  19. Mullins, D., & Murie, A. (2006). Housing policy in the UK. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  20. Pancs, R., & Vriend, N. (2007). Schelling’s spatial proximity model of segregation revisited. Journal of Public Economics, 91, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Peach, C. (1999). London and New York: Contrasts in British and American models of segregation. International Journal of Population Geography, 5, 319–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Phillips, D. (1998). Black minority ethnic concentration, segregation and dispersal in Britain. Urban Studies, 35(10), 1681–1702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Phillips, D. (2007). Ethnic and racial segregation: A critical perspective. Geography Compass, 1(5), 1138–1159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Power, A., & Mumford, K. (1999). The slow death of great cities? Urban abandonment or urban renaissance. York: York Publishing Services Limited.Google Scholar
  25. Schelling, T. (1969). Models of segregation. The American Economic Review, 59(2), 488–493.Google Scholar
  26. Schelling, T. (1971). Dynamic models of segregation. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 1(2), 143–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Strand, S. (2002). Pupil mobility, attainment and progress in Key Stage 1: A study in cautious interpretation. British Education Research Journal, 28, 63–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Tu, Y., & Goldfinch, J. (1996). A two-stage housing choice forecasting model. Urban Studies, 33(3), 517–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tunstall, R. (2003). ‘Mixed tenure’ policy in the UK: Privatization, pluralism or euphemism? Housing, Theory and Society, 20, 153–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Yin, L. (2009). The dynamics of residential segregation in Buffalo: An agent-based simulation. Urban Studies, 46(13), 2749–2770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Zhang, J. (2004a). A dynamic model of residential segregation. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 28(3), 147–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Zhang, J. (2004b). Residential segregation in an all-integrationist world. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 54(4), 533–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Spatial Analysis and Policy, School of GeographyUniversity of LeedsLeedsUK

Personalised recommendations