Skip to main content

Extension of ProFamy Model to Project Elderly Disability Status and Home-Based Care Costs, with an Illustrative Application

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Household and Living Arrangement Projections

Part of the book series: The Springer Series on Demographic Methods and Population Analysis ((PSDE,volume 36))

  • 899 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter presents a substantial extension of the ProFamy model by introducing and estimating changes in older adults’ disability status as well as related home-based care costs, with an illustrative application to China. Our extended model combines the projection of family structure, living arrangements, and disability statuses for elders aged 65+ with the projection of family structure and living arrangements for the younger population aged 0–64. The extended model projects not only disability statuses and home-based care needs and costs for older adults, but also age-sex-specific numbers and family household structures of the working-age population, i.e., the caregivers for the disabled elderly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The health status of elderly in the present study is measured by ADL, but it may also be measured by other indicators.

  2. 2.

    We may of course distinguish seven marital/union statuses for applications in the other countries (e.g., the U.S.), where cohabitation is rather common and the needed data are available.

  3. 3.

    Because number of co-residing children is equal to or less than parity, the number of composite statuses of parity and co-residing children is \( {\displaystyle \sum_{p=0}^5\left(p+1\right)} \) rather than (6 × 6).

  4. 4.

    The micro-data of the sixth census of China conducted in 2010 are still not available for scholars and the public to use so far.

  5. 5.

    Following the widely adopted international standards in the elderly population heath surveys, the reference period of one week for care expenditures and time is intended to reduce recall errors of relatively long periods of time.

  6. 6.

    According to the widely adopted international practice, the appropriate period for collecting information on care costs before death is one month on average.

  7. 7.

    The Chinese life expectancy at birth was 71.4 in 2000 and 73 years in 2005, based on the census and mini-census data. Assuming the same future annual rate of increase as that in 2000–2005, the life expectancy at birth in China would be 87.4 years in 2050. Therefore, the low mortality scenario assumption of a life expectancy at birth of 84.8 in 2050 and 88 years old in 2080 in China may not be too optimistic.

  8. 8.

    We use a quadratic curve to smooth the fluctuation of the annual growth rates during 1990–2008 and linear curve fitting during 2009–2030; we assume the care costs and GDP grow at the same annual rate after 2030.

  9. 9.

    Poorer facilities may force rural older persons to perform daily activities by themselves; this frequent exercise may enable them to better maintain or recover their capacities for daily living than their urban counterparts. Furthermore, the harder life and higher mortality at younger ages in rural areas may have resulted in a population of older persons who are more selected than their counterparts in cities and towns are.

  10. 10.

    Perhaps those who live alone may more likely have active ADL capacity; such selection may result in elders having disadvantages in ADL status being more likely to coreside with children compared to those living alone.

  11. 11.

    In our study, the gap between the high (b) and low scenarios will increasingly enlarge as the projection period is prolonged, which is similar to results in other demographers’ high, medium, and low projections Lee and Tuljapurkar (2001: 22).

References

  • Bongaarts, J. (1987). The projection of family composition over the life course with family status life tables. In J. Bongaarts, T. K. Burch, & K. Wachter (Eds.), Family demography: Methods and applications (pp. 189–212). Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coale, A. J., Meredith, J., & Richards, T. (1985). Calculation of age-specific fertility schedules from tabulations of parity in two censuses. Demography, 22, 611–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fancy, S. G. (1997). A new approach for analyzing bird densities from variable circular-plot counts. Pacific Science, 51(1), 107–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, J. R. (1999). The leveling of divorce in the United States. Demography, 36, 409–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gu, D. (2008). General data assessment of the Chinese longitudinal healthy longevity survey in 2002. In Y. Zeng, D. L. Poston, D. A. Vlosky, & D. Gu (Eds.), Healthy longevity in China demographic socioeconomic and psychological dimensions (pp. 39–59). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Guo, Z. (2000). Lifetime fertility of Chinese women: A look at the recent period fertility behavior. Population Research, 24(01), 7–18 [in Chinese].

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo, Z. (2003). Changes in family households in China in 1990s. Paper presented at the academic conference on the 2000 population census in China, Beijing, 28–31 Mar 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo, Z. (2007). Multi-level analysis on the sex ratio at birth in China based on the 2000 census and the regional fertility policy data. Population Research, 5(3), 20–31 [in Chinese].

    Google Scholar 

  • Himes, C. L. (1992). Future caregivers: Projected family structures of older persons. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 47(1), S17–S26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, F. (2012). Report: Nearly 90 percent of Chinese families own houses. People’s Daily Online. 15 May 2012. http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/90882/7817224.html. [in Chinese]. Accessed 31 Mar 2013.

  • Jiang, L., & Ren, Q. (2005). Study on the forecast of China’s population, households and housing demand. Market and Population Analysis, 2, 20–29 [in Chinese].

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R. W., Toohey, D., & Wiener, J. M. (2007). Meeting the long-term care needs of the baby boomers: How changing families will affect paid helpers and institutions. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, J. (2003). An analysis of the survey of personal fertility attitudes in Beijing’s one child family. Chinese Journal of Population Science, 4, 74–78 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, X., Xin, L., Tan, M., & Zhao, Y. (2013). Population urbanization may reduce the ecological and environmental pressures. In Y. Zeng, G. Gu, J. Liang, & Z. Guo (Eds.), Fertility policy adjustment and development in China. Beijing: Social Science Literature Press [in Chinese].

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, B. (2004). An analysis for the fertility preference and determinants for childbearing age of women. In P. Guiyu (Ed.), Collection of 2001 national family planning and reproductive health survey research papers (pp. 57–65). Beijing: China Population Press [in Chinese].

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, K., Manton, K. G., & Aragon, C. (2000). Changes in home care use by disabled elderly persons: 1982–1994. The Journals of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 55B(4), S245–S253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, G. C., Torrey, B. B., & Kineslla, K. G. (1992). The paradox of the oldest old in the United States: An international comparison. In R. M. Suzman, D. P. Willis, & K. G. Manton (Eds.), The oldest old (pp. 58–85). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moffitt, R. (2000). Demographic change and public assistance expenditures. In A. J. Auerbach & R. D. Lee (Eds.), Demographic change and public policy (pp. 391–425). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, P. P., Botev, K., Chen, R., & Huang, J. (1999). White and Non-white trends in first birth timing: Comparisons using vital registration and current population surveys. Population Research and Policy Review, 18, 339–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS). (1998). Declines in teenage birth rates, 1991–97: National and State patterns. In S. J. Ventura, T. J. Mathews, & S. C. Curtin (Eds.), National Vital Statistics Report 47, No. 12. Hyattsville: National Center for Health Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitkin, J., & Myers, D. (1994). The specification of demographic effects on housing demand: Avoiding the age-cohort fallacy. Journal of Housing Economics, 3, 240–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi, Q. (2001). Study on the marriage, fertility behavior and attitudes among rural households in Zhejiang Province. Chinese Journal of Population Science., 4, 44–54 [in Chinese].

    Google Scholar 

  • Spain, D. (1997). Societal trends: The aging baby boom and women’s increased independence. Report prepared for the US Department of Transportation, DTFH 61-97-P-00314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stupp, P. W. (1988). A general procedure for estimating intercensal age schedules. Population Index, 54, 209–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treadway, R. (1997). Population projections for the state and counties of Illinois. Springfield: State of Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank and the Development Research Center of State Council of China. (2013). China 2030: Building a modern, harmonious, and creative society. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng, Y. (2007). Options of fertility policy transition in China. Population and Development Review, 33(2), 215–246 (Heading article).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng, Y., Vaupel, J. W., & Wang, Z. (1998). Household projection using conventional demographic data. Population and Development Review supplementary issue: Frontiers of Population Forecasting, 24, 59–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeng, Y., Land, K. C., Wang, Z., & Gu, D. (2006). U.S. family household momentum and dynamics–Extension of ProFamy method and application. Population Research and Policy Review, 25(1), 1–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Z. (2004). Impact of intergenerational support on healthy longevity. Ph.D. thesis, Beijing: Peking University. Supervisor: Professor Yi Zeng.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeng, Y, Chen, H., Wang Z. and Land K. C. (2014a). Implications of Changes in Households and Living Arrangements for Future Home-based Care Needs and Costs of Disabled Elders in China. In press: Journal of Aging and Health.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zeng, Y., Land, K.C., Gu, D., Wang, Z. (2014). Extension of ProFamy Model to Project Elderly Disability Status and Home-Based Care Costs, with an Illustrative Application. In: Household and Living Arrangement Projections. The Springer Series on Demographic Methods and Population Analysis, vol 36. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8906-9_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics