Skip to main content

Diagnostic Screening of Urban Soil Contaminants Using Diffuse Reflectance Spectroscopy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Proximal Soil Sensing

Part of the book series: Progress in Soil Science ((PROSOIL))

Abstract

There is increasing demand for cheap and rapid screening tests for soil contaminants in environmental consultancies. Diffuse infrared reflectance spectroscopy in the visible–near-infrared (vis–NIR) and mid-infrared (MIR) has the potential to meet this demand. The aims of this chapter are to develop diagnostic screening tests for heavy metals and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in soil using vis–NIR and MIR diffuse reflectance spectroscopy. Cadmium, copper, lead, and zinc were analysed, as were total PAHs and benzo[a]pyrene. An ordinal logistic regression technique was used for predictions in the screening tests and to determine false-positive and false-negative rates. Zinc had the best prediction accuracy (89%) and copper predictions were consistently above 75%. Cadmium and lead were the least well predicted of the heavy metals (67 and 70%, respectively), and PAH predictions averaged 78.9%. MIR analysis (average prediction accuracy of 79.9%) was only slightly more accurate than vis–NIR analysis (average prediction accuracy of 77.1%), but the latter may currently be used in situ, thereby reducing cost and time of analysis and providing diagnosis in real time. Diffuse reflectance spectroscopy in the vis–NIR can substantially decrease both the time and the cost associated with screening for soil contaminants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allchin D (2001) Error types. Perspect Sci 9:38–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Australian and New Zealand Environment and Conservation Council (1992) Australian and New Zealand guidelines for the assessment and management of contaminated sites, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Busch MP, Watanabe KK, Smith JW, Hermansen SW, Thomson RA (2000) False-negative testing errors in routine viral marker screening of blood donors. Transfusion 40:585–589

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chuang JC, Van Emon JM, Chou YL, Junod N, Finegold JK, Wilson NK (2003) Comparison of immunoassay and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry for measurement of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in contaminated soil. Anal Chim Acta 486:31–39

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hua G, Broderick J, Semple KT, Killham K, Singleton I (2007) Rapid quantification of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin (HPCD) soil extracts by synchronous fluorescence spectroscopy (SFS). Environ Pollut 148:176–181

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Imray P, Langley A (1999) Health-based soil investigation levels. National Health and Medical Research Council, Canberra, ACT

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen H, Reimann C, Finne TE, Ottesen RT, Arnoldussen A (2007) PAH-concentrations and compositions in the top 2 cm of forest soils along a 120 km long transect through agricultural areas, forests and the city of Oslo, Norway. Environ Pollut 145:829–838

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Markus JA, McBratney AB (1996) An urban soil study: heavy metals in Glebe, Australia. Aus J Soil Res 34:453–465

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Turer D, Maynard JB, Sansalone JJ (2001) Heavy metal contamination in soils of urban highways: comparison between runoff and soil concentrations at Cincinnati, Ohio. Water Air Soil Pollut 132:293–314

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Viscarra Rossel RA, Walvoort DJJ, McBratney AB, Janik LJ, Skjemstad JO (2006) Visible, near infrared, mid infrared or combined diffuse reflectance spectroscopy for simultaneous assessment of various soil properties. Geoderma 131:59–75

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wu Y, Ji JCJ, Gong P, Liao Q, Tian Q, Ma H (2007) A mechanism study of reflectance spectroscopy for investigating heavy metals in soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 71:918–926

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

We thank Julie Cattle and Dahmon Sorongan for the soil samples.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J.G. Bray .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bray, J., Rossel, R.V., McBratney, A. (2010). Diagnostic Screening of Urban Soil Contaminants Using Diffuse Reflectance Spectroscopy. In: Viscarra Rossel, R., McBratney, A., Minasny, B. (eds) Proximal Soil Sensing. Progress in Soil Science. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8859-8_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics