Skip to main content

Environmental Conflicts and Conflict Management: Some Lessons from the WADI Experience at El Hondo Nature Park (South-Eastern Spain)

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Coastal Water Bodies

Abstract

The concept of conflict contains some ambiguity that clearly appears in the relationship between scientific objectivity and socioeconomic subjectivity – albeit objectivity and subjectivity can sometimes exchange their respective adjectives. The case of El Hondo ponds (Valencia Region, Spain) represents a meaningful example. The Regional Environmental Administration enacted water use laws aimed at assuring the survival of a rare population of ducks (Oxyura leucocephala). Unfortunately, the same laws were considered to jeopardise the survival of the local (human) Community of irrigating farmers, the Riegos de Levante. Another regional case concerns with the preservation of the plant species Limonium. The palliative remedy of this conflict consisted in separating as much as possible the areas and the resources linked to wildlife conservation from the ones essential to the regional economy. Separation implies neither debate nor mutual understanding: it is a remedy, not the desirable management of the conflict.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allen, T. F. H., & Roberts, D. W. (2002). Foreword. In T. F. H. Allen & T. W. Hoekstra (Eds.), Toward a unified ecology. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, T. F. H., Tainter, J. A., Pires, J. C., & Hoekstra, T. W. (2001). Dragnet ecology – “Just the facts, Ma’am”: the privilege of science in a postmodern world. BioScience, 51(6), 475–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, K. D. (1997). System and conflict: Towards a symbiotic reconciliation. Quality and Quantity, 31(4), 425–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boehmer-Christiansen, S. (1994). Global climate protection policy: The limits of scientific advice – part 1. Global Environmental Change, 4(2), 140–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boulding, K. (1963). Conflict and defense. A general theory. New York: Harper & Brothers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruckmeier, K. (2005). Interdisciplinary conflict analysis and conflict mitigation in local resource management. Ambio, 34(2), 65–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, S. R. (2002). Ecological futures: Building an ecology of the long now. Ecology, 83(8), 2069–2083.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson, R. A. (1986). Case method. Journal of Medical Ethics, 12, 36–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castro, P. A., & Nielson, E. (Eds.) (2003). Natural resource conflict management case studies: an analysis of power, participation and protected areas. Rome: FAO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crespo, B., & Lledo, M. D. (1998). El género Limonium en la Comunidad Valenciana: taxonomia y conservación. Valencia: Conselleria de Medi Ambient, Generalitat Valenciana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Endter-Wada, J., Blahna, D., Krannich, R., & Brunson, M. (1998). A framework for understanding social science contributions to ecosystem management. Ecological Applications, 8(3), 891–904.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Entelman, R. F. (2002). Teoría de conflictos. Hacia un nuevo paradigma. Barcelona: Editorial Gedisa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galaz, V. (2005). Social-ecological resilience and social conflict: institutions and strategic adaptation in Swedish water management. Ambio, 34(7), 567–572.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenhalgh, T., & Russell, J. (2005). Reframing evidence synthesis as rhetorical action in policy making drama. Healthcare Policy, 1(1), 31–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrick, C. N. (2004). Objectivity versus narrative coherence: science, environmental policy and the U.S. Data Quality Act. Environmental Science & Policy, 7, 419–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrick, C. N., & Jamieson, D. (2001). Junk science and environmental policy: Obscuring public debate with misleading discourse. Philosophy and Public Policy Q, 21, 11–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homer-Dixon, T. F. (1994). Environmental scarcities and violent conflict: Evidence from cases. International Security, 19(1), 5–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Infante, E. (1998). Sobre la definición de conflicto interpersonal: aplicación del cluster analysis al estudio semantico. Revista de Psicologia Social, 3, 485–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaika, M. (2003). The Water Framework Directive: a new directive for a changing social, political and economic European framework. European Planning Studies, 11(3), 303–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kartez, J. D., & Bowman, P. (1993). Quick deals and raw deals: A perspective on abuses of public ADR principles in Texas resource conflicts. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 13, 319–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keough, H. L., & Blahna, D. J. (2006). Achieving integrative, collaborative ecosystem management. Conservation Biology, 20(5), 1373–1382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kyllönen, S., Colpaert, A., Heikkinen, H., Jokinen, M., Kumpula, J., Marttunen, M., et al. (2006). Conflict management as a means to the sustainable use of natural resources. Silva Fennica, 40(4), 687–728.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laguna, E. (Ed.) (1998). Flora endémica, rara o amenazada de la Comunidad Valenciana. Conselleria de Medi Ambient, Generalitat Valenciana: Valencia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martín Cantarino, C. (1999). Integrative Science as adaptive device in environmental crisis: a perspective from ecology. Politics and the Life Sciences, 18(2), 244–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthew, R., Brown, O., & Jensen, D. (2009). From conflict to peacebuilding. The role of natural resources and the environment. UNEP’s Post-Conflict and Disaster Management Branch (PCDMB), Policy Paper nº 1, Geneve.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikhledize, N., & Pirozzi, N. (2008). Civil society and conflict transformation in Abkhazia, Israel-Palestine, Nagorno-Karabakh, Transnistria and Western Sahara. MICROCON Policy Working Paper nº 3, Brighton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mollinga, P. P. (2008). Water, politics and development: Framing a political sociology of water resources management. Water Alternatives, 1(1), 7–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neff, M. W. (2007). Scenario planning for wildlife management: a case study of the National Elk Refuge, Jackson, Wyoming. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 12, 219–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedreño Cánovas, A., & Cid Cid, J. F. (1998). Conflictos entre localidades y protección de espacios naturales en España. Ecología Política, 15, 79–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redorta, J. (2007). Cómo analizar los conflictos. La tipología de conflictos como herramienta de mediación (2nd ed.). Barcelona: Ed. Paidós.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarewitz, D. (2000). Science and environmental policy: An excess of objectivity. In R. Frodeman (Ed.), Earth matters: the Earth sciences, philosophy, and the claims of community. New York: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steyaert, P., & Ollivier, G. (2007). The European water framework directive: how ecological assumptions frame technical and social change. Ecology and Society, 12(1), 25. Retrieved January 8, 2009, from http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss1/art25/

  • Swanström, N. L. P., & Weissmann, M. S. (2005). Conflict, conflict prevention and conflict management and beyond: a conceptual exploration. Concept Paper. Washington-Uppsala: Central Asia-Caucasus Institute and Silk Road Studies Program. John Hopkins University – Uppsala University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swart, J. A. A., & van Andel, J. (2008). Rethinking the interface between ecology and society. The case of the cockle controversy in the Dutch Wadden Sea. Journal of Applied Ecology, 45, 82–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tjosvold, D. (2006). Defining conflict and making choices about its management. Lighting the dark side of organizational life. International Journal of Conflict Management, 17(2), 87–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. General Accounting Office (1990). Case study evaluations. Washington, DC: Program Evaluation and Methodology Division, GAO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Molen, P., & Hildering, A. (2005). Water: cause for conflict or co-operation? Journal on Science and World Affairs, 1(2), 133–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, D. H., Cowell, S. G., & Johnson, A. K. L. (2001). Integrating research results into decision making about natural resource management at a catchment scale. Agricultural Systems, 69, 85–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yasmi, Y., Anshari, G. Z., Komarudin, H., & Alqadri, S. (2006). Stakeholder conflicts and forest decentralization policies in West Kalimantan: their dynamics and implications for future forest management. Forest, Trees and Livelihoods, 16, 167–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zellmer, A. J., Allen, T. F. H., & Kesseboehmer, K. (2006). The nature of ecological complexity: A protocol for building the narrative. Ecological Complexity, 3, 171–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carlos Martín-Cantarino .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Martín-Cantarino, C. (2010). Environmental Conflicts and Conflict Management: Some Lessons from the WADI Experience at El Hondo Nature Park (South-Eastern Spain). In: Scapini, F., Ciampi, G. (eds) Coastal Water Bodies. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8854-3_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics