Boundary Questions Between Ontology and Biology

  • Pietro Ramellini


This chapter deals with some problems linking biology and ontology. After a general survey of the most prominent ontological questions lying behind biology, the study case of biological boundaries is addressed. The scrutiny of the relevant literature shows that biologists speak of various types of boundary: perceptual, compositional, epithelial, cellular and sensu lato processual boundaries; all of them appear to be, in a way or another, flawed by some theoretical inconsistencies. So, a new concept of organismic boundary is introduced and discussed, by which the organismic boundary is the (concrete) part of an organism which spatially encompasses all and only the other (concrete) parts of that organism.


Coherent System Organismic Boundary Living Body Processual Boundary Developmental System Theory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



This work is supported by a grant from the John Templeton Foundation, and is part of the Research Project ‘The Organism in Interdisciplinary Context’ of the STOQ Project. I thank my friend and philosopher Alberto Bertini for helpful comments and incessant encouragement, Roberto Poli for having invited me to reflect more carefully upon the links between ontology and biology, and an anonymous referee for his or her valuable suggestions.


  1. Ageno, M. 1986. Le radici della biologia. Milano: Feltrinelli.Google Scholar
  2. Ageno, M. 19922. Dal non vivente al vivente. Nuove ipotesi sull’origine della vita. Palermo: Theoria.Google Scholar
  3. Allen, C., M. Bekoff, and G. Lauder eds. 1998. Nature’s purposes. Cambridge, MA; London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  4. Atlan, H. 1979. Entre le cristal et la fumée. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
  5. Bertalanffy, L. von. 1968. General system theory. New York: Braziller.Google Scholar
  6. Boniolo, G. 2003. Che cos’è il caso in biologia? Riflessioni a partire da J. Monod, Il caso e la necessità. Roma, Atti Convegni Lincei 185:25–44.Google Scholar
  7. Boniolo, G., and M. Carrara. 2004. On biological identity. Biology & Philosophy 19:443–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brandon, R.N. 1997. Does biology have laws? Philosophy of Science, Proceedings 64:S444–S457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bunge, M. 1977. Treatise on basic philosophy, vol. 3: Ontology I. Dordrecht-Boston: Reidel.Google Scholar
  10. Campbell, D.T. 1974. ‘Downward causation’ in hierarchically organised biological systems. In Studies in the philosophy of biology, eds. F.J. Ayala, and T. Dobzhansky, 179–186. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  11. Casati, R., and A. Varzi. 1999. Parts and places. Cambrige, MA; London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  12. Coyne, J., and H. Allen Orr. 2004. Speciation. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.Google Scholar
  13. Dawkins, R. 1982. The extended phenotype. Oxford: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
  14. De Rossi, P. 2006. The so-called human body. In: The organism in interdisciplinary context, ed. P. Ramellini, 113–127. Vatican: LEV.Google Scholar
  15. Diderot, D. 1769. La rêve de D’Alembert. In: 1875–1877. Oeuvres complètes de Diderot, ed. J. Assézat. Paris: Garnier, t. 2.Google Scholar
  16. Edelman, G.M. 1988. Topobiology. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  17. Foerster, H. von. 1960. On self-organizing systems and their environments. In: Self-organizing systems, eds. M.C. Yovits, and S. Cameron, 31–50. London: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  18. Foerster, H. von. 1982. Observing systems. Seaside: Intersystems Publications.Google Scholar
  19. Ford, N. M. 1988. When did I begin? Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Foucault, M. 1966. Les mots et les choses. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  21. Fry, I. 2000. The emergence of life on Earth. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Ghiselin, M.T. 1974. A radical solution to the species problem. Systematic Zoology 23:536–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gil, F. 1978. Coppie filosofiche, 1050–1095. In: Enciclopedia Einaudi, vol. 3. Torino: Einaudi.Google Scholar
  24. Haldane, J.S. 1931. The philosophical basis of biology. London: Hodder & Stoughton.Google Scholar
  25. Hoffman, J., and G.S. Rosenkrantz. 1997. Substance: Its nature and existence. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Hoffmeyer, J. 1998. Surfaces inside surfaces: On the origin of agency and life. Cybernetics & Human Knowing 5(1):33–42.Google Scholar
  27. Gibson, J.J. 1950. The perception of the visual World. Boston, MA: Houghton-Mifflin.Google Scholar
  28. Jacquette, D. 2002. Ontology. Chesham: Acumen Publishing.Google Scholar
  29. Johnsen, S., and E.A. Widder. 1999. The physical basis of transparency in biological tissue: Ultrastructure and the minimization of light scattering. Journal of Theoretical Biology 199(2):181–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jonas, H. 1966. The phenomenon of life. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  31. Kauffman, S.A. 1995. At home in the universe. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Kauffman, S.A. 2000. Investigations. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Keller, E.F. 2001. Beyond the gene but beneath the skin. In Cycles of contingency, eds. S. Oyama, P.E. Griffiths, and R.D. Gray, 299–312. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  34. Laubichler, M.D., and G.P. Wagner. 2000. Organism and character decomposition: Steps towards an integrative theory of biology. Philosophy of Science, Proceedings 67:S289–S300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Luisi, P.L. 2006. The emergence of life. Cambridge etc.: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mahner, M., and M. Bunge. 1997. Foundations of biophilosophy. Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Maturana, H.R., and F.J. Varela. 1980. Autopoiesis and cognition. Dordrecht etc.: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mayr, E. 1982. The growth of biological thought. Cambridge, MA; London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Monod, J. 1970. Le hasard et la nécessité. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
  40. Needham, J. 1936. Order and life. Cambridge; New Haven: Cambridge & Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  41. NIH (U. S. National Institutes of Health). 2006. Stem cell information. Accessed 2006-09-14.
  42. Oyama, S. 1985. The ontogeny of information. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Piaget, J. 1967. Biologie et connaissance. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  44. Poli, R. 2001. The basic problems of the theory of levels of reality. Axiomathes 12(3–4):261–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Portmann, A. 1965. Aufbruch der Lebensforschung. Zürich: Rhein.Google Scholar
  46. Ramellini, P. 2001. Dai livelli di organizzazione ai livelli biologici. Systema Naturae 3:203–213.
  47. Ramellini, P. 2002. Prolegomeni alla biologia: dalla percezione alla classificazione. Epistemologia 25:185–198.Google Scholar
  48. Ramellini, P. 2003. L’evoluzione al tempo della postgenomica (e oltre). In La Nuova Scienza, vol. 4: La società infobiologica, eds. U. Colombo, and G. Lanzavecchia, 81–90. Milano: Libri Scheiwiller.Google Scholar
  49. Ramellini, P. 2006a. Life and Organisms. Vatican: LEV.Google Scholar
  50. Ramellini, P. 2006b. Il corpo vivo. Siena: Cantagalli.Google Scholar
  51. Ramellini, P. 2007. Temi di biologia teorica. Roma: Pontifical University ‘Regina Apostolorum’.Google Scholar
  52. Rashevsky, N. 1961. Mathematical principles in biology and their applications. Springfield, IL: Thomas.Google Scholar
  53. Rizzotti, M. ed. 1996. Defining life. Padova: University of Padova.Google Scholar
  54. Rosen, R. 2000. Essays on life itself. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Salthe, S.N. 1993. Development and evolution: Complexity and change in biology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  56. Schiller, J. 1978. La notion d’organisation dans l’histoire de la biologie. Paris: Maloine.Google Scholar
  57. Schuh, R. 2000. Biological systematics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Simons, P. 1987. Parts: A study in ontology. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  59. Smith, B. 1994. Fiat objects. In Parts and wholes: Conceptual part-whole relations and formal mereology, eds. N. Guarino, S. Pribbenow, and L. Vieu, 15–23. Proceedings of the ECAI94 Workshop, Amsterdam, ECCAI.Google Scholar
  60. Smith, B., and A. Varzi. 1997. The formal ontology of boundaries The Electronic Journal of Analytic Philosophy (online publication), 5.
  61. Smith, B., and A. Varzi. 2000. Fiat and Bona Fide boundaries. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 60:401–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Smith, B., and A. Varzi. 2002. Surrounding space: On the ontology of organism-environment relations. Theory in Biosciences 120:139–162.Google Scholar
  63. Stroll, A. 1988. Surfaces. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  64. Thagard, P. 1999. How scientists explain disease. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  65. Thom, R. 1998. Goethe e la pregnanza delle origini. In: Goethe scienziato, eds. G. Giorello, and A. Grieco, 253–297. Torino: Einaudi.Google Scholar
  66. Varzi, A. 2004. Boundary. In: The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Spring 2004 Edition), ed. E.N. Zalta.
  67. Wilson, J.A. 1999. Biological individuality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Wilson, M. 2005. Microbial inhabitants of humans. Cambridge etc.: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  69. Wimsatt, W.C. 1976. Complexity and organization. In Topics in the philosophy of biology, eds. M. Grene, and E. Mendelsohn, 174–193. Dordrecht-Boston: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Winkelmann, R.K. 1959. The erogenous zones: Their nerve supply and significance. Mayo Clinic proceedings. Mayo Clinic 34(2):39–47.Google Scholar
  71. Woodger, J.H. 19291. Biological principles. London: Routledge & Kegan (London-New York, Routledge & Kegan-Humanities Press, 19672).Google Scholar
  72. Woodger, J.H. 1937. The axiomatic method in biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Netherlands 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Pontifical University ‘Regina Apostolorum’RomeItaly

Personalised recommendations