Advertisement

Investing in Children? Changes in Policies Concerning Children and Families in European Countries

  • Thomas Olk
Chapter
Part of the Children¿s Well-Being: Indicators and Research book series (CHIR, volume 2)

Abstract

Until recently children and families only played a marginal role in welfare politics. Prior to this shift within the political sphere, the main focus was placed upon protecting (male) workers against the risks associated with industrial work: old age, sickness, occupational accidents and unemployment. Women and children were protected indirectly by provision offered to the male breadwinner. Choices involving the structure of the family and the rearing of children were considered private matters. As a consequence, in the developed welfare states, the lion’s share of social spending was dedicated to pensions and health, while the share of the social budget that was spent on children and families only represented a marginal sum.

Keywords

Welfare State Parental Leave Family Policy Daycare Centre Childcare Centre 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Amann, S. (2006). Wie das Elterngeld wirklich wirkt. Spiegel Online 2009, Spiegelnet GmbH. Retrieved from http://www.spiegel.de/wirtschaft/0,1518,623066,00.html
  2. Anttonen, A., & Sipilä, J. (1996). European social care services: Is it possible to identity models? Journal of European Social Policy, 6(1), 87–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bertram, H., Rösler, W., & Ehlert, N. (2005). Nachhaltige Familienpolitik. Zukunftssicherung durch einen Dreiklang von Zeitpolitik, finanzieller Transferpolitik und Infrastrukturpolitik. Berlin: Bundesministeriums für Familie, Senioren, Frauen und Jugend.Google Scholar
  4. Bimbi, F., & Della Sala, V. (2001). Italy: Policy without participation. In J. Jenson & M. Sineau (Eds.), Who cares? Women’s work, childcare, and welfare state redesign (pp. 118–145). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  5. Blome, A., Keck, W., & Alber, J. (2008). Generationenbeziehungen im Wohlfahrtsstaat: Lebensbedingungen und Einstellungen von Altersgruppen im internationalen Vergleich. Wiesbaden, VS: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  6. BMFSFJ. (2006). Familie zwischen Flexibilität und Verlässlichkeit. Perspektiven für eine lebenslaufbezogene Familienpolitik. Berlin: Siebter Familienbericht.Google Scholar
  7. BMFSFJ. (2008, September 28). Pressemitteilung des Bundesministeriums für Familie, Senioren, Frauen und Jugend zum Kinderförderungsgesetz (KiföG), Berlin.Google Scholar
  8. Bock-Famulla, K. (2008). Länderreport Frühkindliche Bildungssysteme. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung.Google Scholar
  9. Conti, C., & Sgritta, G. B. (2004). Childhood in Italy: A family affair. In A. M. Jensen, A. Ben-Arieh, C. Conti, D. Kutsar, M. N. Ghiolla Phádraig, & H. Warming Nilsen (Eds.), Children’s welfare in ageing Europe (Vol. 1, pp. 81–142). Trondheim: Norwegian Centre for Child Research.Google Scholar
  10. Della Sala, V. (2002). Modernization and welfare-state restructuring in Italy: The impact on child care. In S. Michel & R. Mahon (Eds.), Child care policy at the crossroads: Gender and welfare state restructuring (pp. 171–190). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Dobrowolsky, A., & Jenson, J. (2005). Social investment perspectives and practices: A decade in British politics. Social Policy Review, 17, 203–230.Google Scholar
  12. Ellingsæter, A. L. (2003). The complexity of family policy reform. The case of Norway. European Societies, 5(4), 419–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ellingsæter, A. L. (2006). The Norwegian childcare regime and its paradoxes. In A. L. Ellingsæter (Ed.), Politicising parenthood in Scandinavia. Gender relations in welfare states (pp. 121–144). Cambridge: The Policy Press.Google Scholar
  14. Ellingsæter, A. L. (2007). ‘Old’ and ‘new’ politics of time to care: Three Norwegian reforms. Journal of European Social Policy, 17(49), 49–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ellingsæter, A. L., & Gulbrandsen, L. (2007). Closing the childcare gap: The interaction of childcare provision and mothers’ agency in Norway. Journal of Social Policy, 36(4), 649–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Cambridge: The Policy Press.Google Scholar
  17. Esping-Andersen, G. (2002). A child-centred social investment strategy. In G. Esping-Andersen, D. Gallie, A. Hemerijck, & J. Myles (Eds.), Why we need a new welfare state (pp. 26–67). Oxford: University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Esping-Anderson, G. (2005). Children in the welfare state. A social investment approach. DemoSoc Working Paper No. 2005–10.Google Scholar
  19. Esping-Andersen, G. (2008). Childhood investments and skill formation. International Tax and Public Finance, 15(1), 19–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fargion, V. (2010). Children, gender and families in the Italian welfare state. In J. Gal & M. Ajzenstadt (Eds.), Gender families and children in Mediterranean welfare states. New York: Springer:105–128.Google Scholar
  21. Ferrera, M. (1996). The ‘Southern Model’ of welfare in social Europe. Journal of European Social Policy, 6(17), 17–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ferrera, M. (2005). Welfare states and social safety nets in Southern Europe: An introduction. In M. Ferrera (Ed.), Welfare state reform in Southern Europe, fighting poverty and social exclusion in Italy, Spain, Portugal and Greece (pp. 1–32). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Flaquer, L. (2000). Is there a Southern European model of family policy? In A. Pfenning & T. Bahle (Eds.), Family and family policy in Europe: Comparative perspectives (pp. 15–33). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  24. Gabel, S. G., & Kamerman, S. B. (2006). Investing in children: Public commitment in twenty-one industrialized countries in social review. Chicago: The University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  25. Greve, B. (2000). Family policy in the Nordic countries. In A. Pfenning & T. Bahle (Eds.), Families and family policy in Europe: Comparative perspectives (pp. 90–103). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  26. Gulbrandsen, L. (2009). The Norwegian cash-for-care reform: Changing behaviour and stable attitudes. Nordisk Barnehageforskning, 2(1), 17–25.Google Scholar
  27. Hall, P. A. (1993). Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: The case of economic policymaking in Britain. Comparative Politics, 25(3), 275–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hemmerling, A. (2007). Der Kindergarten als Bildungsinstitution. Hintergründe und Perspektiven. Wiesbaden, VS: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  29. Hohnerlein, E. M. (2009). The paradox of public preschools in a familist welfare regime: The Italian case. In K. Scheiwe & H. Willekens (Eds.), Child care and preschool development in Europe: Institutional perspectives (pp. 88–104). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  30. James, A., & James, A. L. (2004). Constructing childhood: Theory, policy and social practice. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  31. James, A., & James, A. L. (2005). Introduction: The politics of childhood – An overview. In J. Goddard, S. McNamee, A. James, & A. L. James (Eds.), The politics of childhood. International perspectives, contemporary developments (pp. 3–12). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  32. Jenson, J. (2004). Changing the paradigm: Family responsibility or investing in children. The Canadian Journal of Sociology, 29(2), 169–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jenson, J., & Saint-Martin, D. (2003). New routes to social cohesion? Citizenship and the social investment state. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 28(1), 77–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jurczyk, K., Olk, T., & Zeiher, H. (2004). German children’s welfare between economy and ideology. In A. M. Jensen, A. Ben-Arie, C. Conti, D. Kutsar, M. Ghiolla Phádraig, & H. W. Nielsen (Eds.), Children’s welfare in ageing Europe (Vol. 2, pp. 703–770). Trondheim: Norwegian Center for Child Research.Google Scholar
  35. Kjorholt, A. T. (2005). The competent child and the ‘right to be oneself’: Reflections on children as fellow citizens in an early childhood centre. In A. Clark, A. Kjorholt, & P. Moss (Eds.), Beyond listening: Children’s perspectives on early children’s services (pp. 151–175). Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
  36. Korsvold, T. (1991). Kindergarten und Kulturvermittlung. Entwicklung und Eigenarten des norwegischen Kindergarten-Modells. Pädagogische Rundschau, 45(2), 227–237.Google Scholar
  37. Kuebler, D. (2007). Understanding the recent expansion of Swiss family policy: An idea-centred approach. Journal of Social Policy, 36(2), 217–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Leira, A., Tobio, C., & Trifiletti, R. (2005). Kinship and informal support: Care resources for the first generation of working mothers in Norway, Italy and Spain. In U. Gerhard, T. Knijn, & A Weckwert (Eds.), Working mothers in Europe: A comparison of policies and practices (pp. 74–96). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  39. Leitner, S. (2008). Ökonomische Funktionalität der Familienpolitik oder familienpolitische Funktionalisierung der Ökonomie. In A. Evers & R. G. Heinze (Eds.), Sozialpolitik. Ökonomisierung und Entgrenzung (pp. 67–82). Wiesbaden, VS: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lister, R. (2004). The Third way’s social investment state. In H. Lewis & R. Surender (Eds.), Welfare state change: Toward a third way? (pp. 157–181). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lister, R. (2006). An agenda for children: Investing in the future or promoting well-being in the present? In J. Lewis (Ed.), Children, changing families and welfare states (pp. 51–66). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  42. Menniti, A., Palomba, R., & Sabbadini, L. L. (1997). Italy: Changing the family from within. In F. X. Kaufmann, A. Kuijsten, H. J. Schulze, & K. P. Strohmeier (Eds.), Family life and policies in Europe: Structures and trends in the 1980s (Vol. 1, pp. 225–252). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  43. Mohn, L., & von der Leyen, U. (Eds.). (2007). Familie gewinnt: die Allianz und ihre Wirkungen für Unternehmen und Gesellschaft. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung.Google Scholar
  44. Naldini, M. (2000). Family allowances in Italy and Spain: Long ways to reform. In A. Pfenning & T. Bahle (Eds.), Family and family policy in Europe: Comparative perspectives (pp. 70–89). New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  45. Naldini, M., & Saraceno, C. (2008). Social and family policies in Italy: Not totally frozen but far from structural reforms. Social Policy & Administration, 42(7), 733–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Nilsen, R. D. (2008). Children in nature: Cultural ideas and social practices in Norway. In A. James, A. L. James (Eds.), European childhoods: Cultures, politics and childhoods in Europe (pp. 38–60). New York: Palgrave Macmillian.Google Scholar
  47. OECD. (2001). Starting strong: Early childhood and care. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  48. OECD. (2006). Starting strong II: Early childhood education and care. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  49. Olk, T., & Hübenthal, M. (2009). Child poverty in the German social investment state. Journal of Family Research, 21(2), 150–167.Google Scholar
  50. Olk, T., & Wintersberger, H. (2007). Welfare states and generational order. In H. Wintersberger, L. Alanen, T. Olk, & J. Qvortrup (Eds.), Childhood, generational order and the welfare state: Exploring children’s social and economic welfare (Vol. 1, pp. 59–90). Odense: University Press of Southern Denmark.Google Scholar
  51. Qvortrup, J. (2008). Childhood in the welfare state. In A. James & A. L. James (Eds.), European childhoods: Cultures, politics and childhoods in Europe (pp. 216–233). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  52. Rauschenbach, T. (2006). Wer betreut Deutschlands Kinder? Eine einleitende Skizze In W. Bien, T. Rauschenbach, & B. Riedel (Eds.), Wer betreut Deutschlands Kinder? DJI-Kinderbetreuungsstudie (pp. 10–24). Weinheim/Basel: Beltz.Google Scholar
  53. Risa, A. E. (1999). Familienpolitik in Norwegen. In C. Leipert (Ed.), Aufwertung der Erziehungsarbeit. Europäische Perspektiven einer Strukturreform der Familien- und Gesellschaftspolitik (pp. 245–258). Opladen: Leske und Budrich.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Ristau, M. (2005). Der ökonomische Charme der Familie. In Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte (ApuZ). Beilage zur Zeitschrift Das Parlament, 23–24, 16–23.Google Scholar
  55. Rürup, B., & Gruesco, S. (2003). Nachhaltige Familienpolitik im Interesse einer aktiven Bevölkerungsentwicklung: Gutachten im Auftrag des Bundesministeriums für Familie, Senioren, Frauen und Jugend. Berlin: Bundesministerium für Familie, Senioren, Frauen und Jugend.Google Scholar
  56. Saraceno, C. (1994). The ambivalent familism of the Italian welfare state. Social Politics, 1(1), 60–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Saraceno, C. (1997). Family change, family policies and the restructuring of welfare. In OECD (Ed.), Family, market and community: Equity and efficiency in social policy (pp. 81–100). Paris: OECD Social Policy Studies 21.Google Scholar
  58. Satka, M., & Eydal, G. B. (2004). The history of Nordic policies for children. In H. Brembeck, B. Johansson, & J. Kampmann (Eds.), Beyond the competent child: Exploring contemporary childhood in the Nordic welfare societies (pp. 33–61). Roskilde: Roskilde University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Schmidt, V. A. (2002). Does discourse matter in the politics of welfare state adjustment? Comparative Political Studies, 35(2), 168–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Schmidt, V. A., & Radaelli, C. M. (2004). Policy change and discourse in Europe: Conceptual and methodological issues. West European Politics, 27(2), 183–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Skevik, A., & Hatland, A. (2008). Family policies in Norway. In I. Ostner & C. Schmitt (Eds.), Family policies in the context of family change. The Nordic countries in comparative perspective (pp. 89–107). Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Sørensen, Ø., & Stråth, B. (Eds.). (1997). The cultural construction of Norden. Oslo, Stockholm, Copenhagen, Oxford, Boston: Scandinavian University Press.Google Scholar
  63. Spieß, K. C., Berger, E. M., & Groh-Samberg, O. (2008). Die öffentlich geförderte Bildungs- und Betreuungsinfrastruktur in Deutschland: Eine ökonomische Analyse regionaler und nutzergruppenspezifischer Unterschiede. Innocenti Working Paper 2008–03. Florence: UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre.Google Scholar
  64. Strand, T. (2006). The social game of early childhood education. The case of Norway. In J. Einarsdottir & J. T. Wagner (Eds.), Nordic childhoods and early education, philosophy, research, policy, and practice in Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden (pp. 71–99). Greenwich: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  65. Therborn, G. (1993). The politics of childhood: The rights of children in modern times. In F. Castles (Ed.), Families of nations: Patterns of public policy in western democracies (pp. 241–293). Aldershot: Avebury.Google Scholar
  66. Trifiletti, R. (1999). Southern European welfare regimes and the worsening position of women. Journal of European Social Policy, 9(1), 29–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Wagner, J. T. (2006). An outsider’s perspectives. Childhoods and early education in the Nordic countries. In J. Einarsdottir & J. T. Wagner (Eds.), Nordic childhoods and early education. Philosophy, research, policy, and practice in Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden (pp. 289–306). Greenwich: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  68. Yee, A. S. (1996). The causal effects of ideas on policies. International Organization, 50(1), 69–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Martin-Luther-Universität Halle/Wittenberg Institut für PädagogikHalle/SaaleGermany

Personalised recommendations