Satellite-Based Monitoring of Archaeological Looting in Peru

  • Rosa Lasaponara
  • Maria Danese
  • Nicola MasiniEmail author
Part of the Remote Sensing and Digital Image Processing book series (RDIP, volume 16)


Illegal excavations represent one of the main risk factors which affect the archaeological heritage all over the world, in particular in those countries, from Southern America to Middle East, where the surveillance on site is little effective and time consuming and the aerial surveillance is non practicable due to military or political restrictions. In such contexts satellite remote sensing offers a suitable chance to monitor this phenomenon. The chapter deals with the results obtained on some areas of Cahuachi (Peru) by using a time series of very high resolution satellite images. The rate of success in detecting changes related to archaeological looting has been fruitfully improved by adopting a semiautomatic approach based on spatial autocorrelation.


Archaeological looting Spatial autocorrelation Cahuachi Peru 


  1. Anselin L (1995) Local indicators of spatial association LISA. Geogr Anal 27:93–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Atkinson PM, Lewis P (2000) Geostatistical classification for remote sensing: an introduction. Comput Geosci 26:362–371Google Scholar
  3. Atwood R (2006) Stealing history: tomb raiders, smugglers, and the looting of the ancient world. Reprint, GriffinGoogle Scholar
  4. Brodie N, Renfrew C (2005) Looting and the world’s archaeological heritage: the inadequate response. Annu Rev Anthropol 34:343–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ciminale M, Gallo D, Lasaponara R, Masini N (2009) A multiscale approach for reconstructing archaeological landscapes: applications in Northern Apulia (Italy). Archaeol Prospect 16:143–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cliff AD, Ord JK (1981) Spatial processes, models, and applications. Pion, LondonGoogle Scholar
  7. Curran P, Atkinson PM (1998) Geostatistics and remote sensing. Progr Phys Geog 22(1):61–78Google Scholar
  8. Fowler MJF (1997) A ColdWar spy satellite image of Bury Hill near Andover, Hampshire. Hamps Field Club Archaeol Soc Newslett 27:5–7Google Scholar
  9. Gatrell AC, Bailey TC, Diggle PJ, Rowlingson BS (1996) Spatial point pattern analysis and its application in geographical epidemiology. T I Brit Geogr 21:256–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Geary RC (1954) The contiguity ratio and statistical mapping. Incorp Statist 5:115–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Getis A, Ord JK (1992) The analysis of spatial association by use of distance statistics. Geogr Anal 24:189–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hyppänen H (1996) Spatial autocorrelation and optimal spatial resolution of optical remote sensing data in Boreal forest environment. Int J Remote Sens 17(17):3441–3452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Illian J, Penttinen A, Stoyan H, Stoyan D (2008) Statistical analysis and modelling of spatial point patterns. Wiley, West Sussex, 534 pGoogle Scholar
  14. Lasaponara R, Masini N (2010) Facing the archaeological looting in Peru by local spatial autocorrelation statistics of Very high resolution satellite imagery. In: Taniar D et al (eds) Proceedings of ICSSA, The 2010 international conference on computational science and its application, Fukuoka-Japan, 23–26 Mar 2010, Springer, Berlin, pp 261–269Google Scholar
  15. Lasaponara R, Masini N, Rizzo E, Coluzzi R, Orefici G (2011) New discoveries in the Piramide Naranjada in Cahuachi (Peru) using satellite, ground probing radar and magnetic investigations. J Archaeol Sci 38:2031–2039. doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2010.12.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. López-Granados F, Jurado-Expósito M, Peña-Barragán JM, García-Torres L (2005) Using geostatistical and remote sensing approaches for mapping soil properties. Eur J Agron 23:279–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Luke C (2006) Diplomats, Banana Cowboys, and Archaeologists in Western Honduras: a history of the trade in Pre-Columbian materials. Int J Cult Property 13(1):25–57Google Scholar
  18. Masini N, Lasaponara N, Orefici G (2009a) Addressing the challenge of detecting archaeological adobe structures in Southern Peru using QuickBird imagery. J Cult Heri 10S:e3–e9. doi: 10.1016/j.culher.2009.10.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Masini N, Rizzo E, Lasaponara R (2009b) Teledeteccion y Investigaciones geofísicas en Cahuachi: primeros resultados. In: Nasca. El Desierto de los Dioses de Cahuachi. Graph Ediciones, Lima, pp 250–277Google Scholar
  20. McAllister M (1991) Looting and vandalism of archaeological resources on federal and Indian lands in the United States. In: Smith GS, Ehrenhard JE (eds) Protecting the past. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 93–99Google Scholar
  21. Moran P (1948) The interpretation of statistical maps. J R Stat Soc A Stat 10:243–251Google Scholar
  22. Orefici G (1992) Nasca. Archeologia per una ricostruzione storica. Jaca Book, MilanoGoogle Scholar
  23. Orefici G (1993) Nasca: arte e società del popolo dei geoglifi. Jaca Book, MilanoGoogle Scholar
  24. Orefici G (2009) Cahuachi, the largest adobe ceremonial centre in the world. In: Nasca. El desierto del los Dioses de Cahuachi. Graph, Lima, pp 36–59Google Scholar
  25. Orefici G, Drusini A (2003) Nasca: hipótesis y evidencias de su desarrollo cultural. Centro Italiano Studi e Ricerche Archeologiche Precolombiane, BresciaGoogle Scholar
  26. Parcak S (2007) Satellite remote sensing methods for monitoring archaeological tells in the Middle East. J Field Archaeol 32(1):65–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Silverman H (1988) Cahuachi: non-urban cultural complexity on the South Coast of Peru. J Field Archaeol 15:403–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Silverman H (1993) Cahuachi in the ancient Nasca world. University of Iowa Press, Iowa CityGoogle Scholar
  29. Stone EC (2008) Patterns of looting in southern Iraq. Antiquity 82:125–138Google Scholar
  30. UNESCO (1956) Recommendation on international principles applicable to archaeological excavations. New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  31. UNESCO (1970) Convention on the means of prohibiting and preventing the illicit import, export and transfer of ownership of cultural property. ParisGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Methodologies for Environmental AnalysisCNR-IMAATito ScaloItaly
  2. 2.Institute of Archaeological and Architectural HeritageCNR-IBAMTito ScaloItaly

Personalised recommendations