Advertisement

Discrete Orthogonality of Zernike Functions and Its Application to Corneal Measurements

  • A. SoumelidisEmail author
  • Z. Fazekas
  • M. Pap
  • F. Schipp
Chapter
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 60)

Abstract

The optical aberrations of human eyes – as well as, those of other optical systems – are often characterized with the Zernike coefficients. Although, these coefficients are normally obtained from discrete measurement data via discrete computations, the developers and programmers of these computer programs could not rely on the discrete orthogonality of the Zernike functions despite the orthogonality of the continuous Zernike functions. Recently, meshes of points over the unit disk were found and reported that ensure this property. In the present paper, such meshes of points are used for computing Zernike coefficients in respect of cornea-like test surfaces. Test results are presented concerning the precision of the surface reconstruction from the aforementioned coefficients. The meshes proposed, however, are not exactly like what the developers hoped for. Further work is necessary in two respects, firstly, how to tune the conventional measurements so that the advantages of the proposed meshes can be exploited, secondly, how to design optical sensors that are based on such meshes.

Keywords

Corneal topography discrete orthogonal systems Zernike functions 

References

  1. 1.
    Corbett, M.C., Rosen, E.S., O’Brart, D.P.S.: Corneal topography: principles and applications. Bmj Publ. Group, London (1999)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fazekas, Z., Soumelidis, A., Bódis-Szomorú, A. Schipp, F.: Specular surface reconstruction for multi-camera corneal topographer arrangements. In: 30th Annual International Conference of IEEE EMBS, pp. 2254–2257, Vancouver, Canada (2008)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Iskander, D.R., Collins, M.J., Davis, B.: Optimal modeling of corneal surfaces with Zernike polynomials. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 48(1), 87–95 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ling, N., Zhang, Y., Rao, X., Wang, C., Hu, Y., W., Jiang., Jiang, C.: Adaptive optical system for retina imaging approaches clinic applications. In: Series Springer Proceedings in Physics, pp. 305–315. Springer, Berlin, Germany (2006)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pap, M., Schipp, F.: Discrete orthogonality of Zernike-functions. Mathematica Pannonica 16(1), 137–144 (2005)zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Salmon, T.O., van de Pol, C.: Normal-eye Zernike coefficients and root-mean-square wavefront errors. J. Cataract Refr. Surg. 32(12), 2064–2074 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Soumelidis, A., Csakany, B.: Specification of test corneal surfaces. (Project Report) CORNEA-INT-2M02. MTA-SZTAKI, Budapest, Hungary (2005)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Szego, G.: Orthogonal polynomials, 4th edn. AMS, New York (1981)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wyant, J.C., Creath, K.: Basic wavefront aberration theory for optical metrology. In: Applied Optics and Optical Engineering, vol. 11. Academic, New York (1992)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zernike, F.: Beugungstheorie des Schneidenverfahrans und Seiner Verbesserten Form, der Phasekontrastmethode. Physica 1, 1137–1144 (1934)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Computer and Automation Reserch InstituteBudapestHungary
  2. 2.University of PecsPecsHungary
  3. 3.Eotvos Lorand UniversityBudapestHungary

Personalised recommendations