Frameworks for Internet Online Hybrid Test

Chapter
Part of the Geotechnical, Geological and Earthquake Engineering book series (GGEE, volume 13)

Abstract

As an extension of the conventional online hybrid tests, the Internet online hybrid tests combine multiple loading tests conducted in remote locations and integrate the tests with sophisticated numerical analysis codes. In this paper, three frameworks for the Internet online hybrid tests, designated as host-station, dual-model, and peer-to-peer frameworks, respectively, are presented. The host-station framework incorporates a user-defined experimental element into the numerical model for the entire structure. The dual-model framework solves the dynamics of the entire structure separately from the static tests and analyses for the substructures. The peer-to-peer framework is more extensible, dividing the entire structure into encapsulated substructures with a generalized interface. Multiple tested substructures and numerical substructures using various structural analysis codes can be accommodated within the single framework, simply interfaced with the boundary displacements and forces. Coordinator programs are developed to keep the boundaries among all substructures compatible and equilibrated. A series of online hybrid tests are conducted and the online hybrid test frameworks are demonstrated to be flexible, extensible and accurate.

Keywords

Seismic Response Plastic Hinge Entire Structure Boundary Displacement Finite Element Program 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

Financial support by the National Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 50808107 is gratefully acknowledged. The first author gratefully acknowledges the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) for giving him a financial support for most of the research reported in this paper. The authors are grateful to the following individuals for their assistance in developing the system and conducting the tests: T. Wang of Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China, H. Tomofuji of Okumura Corporation, Japan, N. Yoshitake of Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism of Japan, J. McCormick of University of Michigan, USA and Y. Murata of Nippon Steel Engineering, Japan. Any errors in this paper are those of the authors alone.

References

  1. 1.
    Mosqueda G, Stojadinovic B, Hanley J, Sivaselvan M, Reinhorn MA (2008) Hybrid seismic response simulation on a geographically distributed bridge model. J Struct Eng 134(4):535–543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    NSF (2000a) Network for earthquake engineering simulation (NEES): earthquake engineering research equipment. Program solicitation. Report NSC00-6, National Science Foundation, USAGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    NSF (2000b) Network for earthquake engineering simulation (NEES): system integration, program solicitation. Report NSC00-7, National Science Foundation, USAGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    NSF (2001) Network for earthquake engineering simulation (NEES): consortium development, program solicitation. Report NSC 01-56, National Science Foundation, USAGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pan P, Tada M, Nakashima M (2005) Online hybrid test by internet linkage of distributed test and analysis domains. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 34:1407–1425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pan P, Tomofuji H, Wang T, Nakashima M, Ohsaki M, Mosalam KM (2006) Development of peer-to-peer (P2P) Internet online hybrid test system. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 35:867–890CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sugiura K, Nagata N, Suzuka Y, Watanabe E (1998) Internet related structural testing. Proceedings of the Eighth KKNN Seminar on Civil Engineering, Singapore, 219–224Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Takahashi Y, Fenves GL (2006) Software framework for distributed experimental-computational simulation of structural systems. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 35:267–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tsai K et al (2003) Network platform for structural experiment and analysis. Report NCREE-03-021, National Center for Research on Earthquake Engineering, TaiwanGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Watanabe E, Yun C, Sugiura K, Park D, Nagata K (2001) Online interactive testing between KAIST and Kyoto University. Proceedings of the Fourteenth KKNN Symposium on Civil Engineering, Kyoto, Japan, pp 369–374.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wang T, Nakashima M, Pan P (2006) On-line hybrid test combining with general-purpose finite element software. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 35:1471–1488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wang K, Tsai K, Wang S, Cheng W, Yang Y (2003) Networked hybrid test frameworks and examples. The Fifth Seminar on Earthquake Engineering for Building Structures (SEEBUS), Kyoto, Japan, 81–90.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wang T, Yoshitake N, Pan P, Lee TH, Nakashima M (2008) Numerical characteristics of peer-to-peer (P2P) Internet online hybrid test system and its application to seismic simulation of SRC structure. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 37:265–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yang YS, Hsieh, SH, Tsai KC, Wang SJ, Wang KJ, Cheng WC, Hsu CW (2007) ISEE: Internet-based simulation for earthquake engineering, Part I: Database approach. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 36:2291–2306CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Netherlands 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringTsinghua UniversityBeijingChina
  2. 2.National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster PreventionHyogo Earthquake Engineering Research CenterHyogoJapan

Personalised recommendations