Abstract
This chapter begins by noting that the relationship between values education and the promotion of wellbeing needs to be clarified if these two concerns are to be incorporated into the curriculum. It analyses alternative conceptions of the role of wellbeing and values education in the curriculum, with particular attention being given to Personal and Social Education and Citizenship Education within the National Curriculum in England. It differentiates various conceptions of wellbeing, including the following: whether it is seen narrowly as a state of mind or more broadly as human flourishing; whether it is open to objective measurement or only to subjective perception; whether it is seen as a short-term state or a long-term condition; and how far its achievement is seen as dependent on social conditions. It shows that official attempts to differentiate Personal and Social Education from Citizenship Education in the English National Curriculum have led to discussion of values being located mainly in the latter, while wellbeing is associated mainly with the former. It is argued that this demarcation makes too sharp a distinction between the personal and the political (where there is no such distinction in underlying values) and rests on too narrow and individualistic a view of wellbeing.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The reference to England rather than to the United Kingdom is deliberate, since in areas of values education and concern with wellbeing there are significant differences between different parts of the United Kingdom (arguably, the approaches of Scotland or Northern Ireland may be better than that of England). Also, the National Curriculum to which I refer below applies to England and in most respect to Wales but not to Scotland or Northern Ireland. To avoid the complexities of untangling throughout this chapter which remarks apply to which parts of the United Kingdom, I shall refer only to England throughout.
- 2.
It is often suggested that knowledge and understanding of the values and beliefs of others can be important in the development of tolerance and respect for others, and hence in the maintenance of harmonious coexistence between different cultures in a plural society. The relevance of such knowledge and understanding to an individual’s own self-reflection, and hence to wellbeing, is less often noted.
- 3.
Often in England there have been different public agencies responsible for advice, policy or administration of different aspects of education. This loose structure was reflected in the 1990s in attention to spiritual and moral development: within a space of 3 years, papers were published on the subject by Ofsted (1994), the National Curriculum Council (NCC, 1993) and the School Curriculum and Assessment Authority (SCAA 1996).
- 4.
Most notably the case of James Bulger, a toddler abducted and killed by two boys who were aged 10Â at the time.
- 5.
The statement can be downloaded from http://curriculum.qca.org.uk/key-stages-1-and-2/Values-aims-and-purposes/ (accessed June 1, 2009). It is also reprinted in Talbot and Tate (1997). For commentary on the statement and follow-up work by SCAA see Haydon (1998).
- 6.
The Statement of Values survives in a somewhat attenuated form in more recent National Curriculum documentation: see ‘Values underpinning the curriculum’ at http://curriculum.qca.org.uk/key-stages-3-and-4/aims/index.aspx (accessed June 1, 2009).
- 7.
- 8.
The above comparison is based on the 2007 programmes of study for PSHE in Key Stages 3 and 4 and for Citizenship in Key Stages 3 and 4 (QCA 2007a–2007f). These are available as downloads from http://www.qca.org.uk. Changes may have been made to the PSHE programmes by the time of publication of the present volume.
References
Ajegbo, K. (2007). Curriculum review: Diversity and citizenship. London: Department for Education and Skills.
Brighouse, H. (2006). On education. London: Routledge.
Crick, B. (1998). Education for citizenship and the teaching of democracy in schools. Final report of the Advisory Group on Citizenship, 22 September 1998. London: Qualifications and Curriculum Authority.
Donne, J. (1987). Devotions upon emergent occasions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Halstead, J. M., & Pike, M. (2006). Citizenship and moral education: Values in action. London: Routledge.
Haydon, G. (1998). Between the common and the differentiated: Reflections on the work of the School Curriculum and Assessment Authority on values education. The Curriculum Journal, 9, 5–21.
Haydon, G. (2005). The importance of PSHE: A philosophical perspective on personal, social and health education. London: Philosophy of Education Society of Great Britain.
NCC. (1993). Spiritual and moral development: A discussion paper. York: National Curriculum Council (NCC).
Ofsted. (1994). Spiritual, moral, social and cultural development. London: Office for Standards in Education (Ofsted).
Ofsted. (2005). Citizenship in secondary schools: Evidence from Ofsted inspections (2003/2004). London: Office for Standards in Education (Ofsted).
Pring, R. (1984). Personal and social education in the curriculum: Concepts and content. London: Hodder & Stoughton.
QCA. (2007a). Citizenship: Programme of study for Key Stage 3 and attainment target. London: Qualifications and Curriculum Authority (QCA).
QCA. (2007b). Citizenship: Programme of study for Key Stage 4 and attainment target. London: Qualifications and Curriculum Authority (QCA).
QCA. (2007c). PSHE: Economic wellbeing and financial capability: Programme of study (non-statutory) for Key Stage 3. London: Qualifications and Curriculum Authority (QCA).
QCA. (2007d). PSHE: Economic wellbeing and financial capability: Programme of study (non-statutory) for Key Stage 4. London: Qualifications and Curriculum Authority (QCA).
QCA. (2007e). PSHE: Personal wellbeing: Programme of study (non-statutory) for Key Stage 3. London: Qualifications and Curriculum Authority (QCA).
QCA. (2007f). PSHE: Personal wellbeing: Programme of study (non-statutory) for Key Stage 4. London: Qualifications and Curriculum Authority (QCA).
Rawls, J. (2001). Justice as fairness: A restatement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
SCAA. (1996). Education for adult life: The spiritual and moral development of young people. London: School Curriculum and Assessment Authority (SCAA).
Straughan. R. (1988). Can we teach children to be good? Basic issues in moral, personal and social education. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
Talbot, M., & Tate, N. (1997). Shared values in a pluralist society? In R. Smith & P. Standish (Eds.), Teaching right and wrong: Moral education in the balance. Stoke-on-Trent: Trentham.
White, J. (1989). The aims of personal and social education. In P. White (Ed.), Personal and social education: Philosophical perspectives. London: Institute of Education.
White, J. (2007). Wellbeing and education: Issues of culture and authority. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 41, 17–28.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Haydon, G. (2010). Values and Wellbeing in the Curriculum: Personal and Public Dimensions. In: Lovat, T., Toomey, R., Clement, N. (eds) International Research Handbook on Values Education and Student Wellbeing. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8675-4_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8675-4_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-8674-7
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-8675-4
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)