Advertisement

Regional and Governmental Action Plan for Integration of Port Development and Environmental Restoration

  • Keita Furukawa
Conference paper

Abstract

There is now a strong public desire to conserve and restore the natural environment of the coastline and a trend towards public participation in those activities by coastline communities. National policy initiatives in this regard have been made these last 10 years in Japan. All revised laws are clearly expressing a concern for environmental conservation and restoration. For example, the Port and Harbor Law clarified the governmental commitment to environmental conservation in the port and harbor administration, stipulating that environmental considerations must be incorporated into port and harbor development. Two case studies from Tokyo Bay and Mikawa Bay will be presented as case studies as representatives of the top-down and bottom-up approach, respectively. These studies tried to highlight the importance of role sharing with the concerned parties to find a balance of the top-down and bottom-up approaches to enable wise use of the coastal ecosystem.

Keywords

Chemical Oxygen Demand Ecosystem Approach Ecological Network Basic Environment Habitat Suitability Index 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Furota T (1980) Seasonal variation of phytoplankton standing stocks in temperate embayment. Bull Plankton Soc Jpn 27:63–73 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  2. Furukawa K, Ishii M (2004) Collaborative bay watch program – Monitoring and modelling of AOSHIO, Proceed. Techno Ocean Network (OTO’04), 1781–1786Google Scholar
  3. Furukawa K, Okada T (2006) Tokyo Bay: Its environmental status – past, present, and future. In: Wolanski E (ed) The environment in Asia pacific harbours. Springer, The Netherlands, pp 15–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Furukawa K, Wallace S (2006) An attempt of integrated environmental assessment based on multiple habitat suitability analysis. Ann J Civil Eng Ocean 22:229––234 (Japanese text with English abstract)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hinata H, Furukawa K (2006) Ecological network linked by the planktonic larvae of the clam Ruditapes philippinarum in Tokyo Bay. In: Wolanski E (ed) The environment in Asia pacific harbours. Springer, The Netherlands, pp 15–34Google Scholar
  6. Kakino J (1986) Effect on shellfish of blue tide in Tokyo Bay. Aquacult Fish Port Eng 22:41–47 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  7. Nomura H (1998) Changes in red tide events and phytoplankton community composition in Tokyo Bay from the historical plankton records in a period between 1907 and 1997. Oceanogr Jpn 7:159–178 (in Japanese)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ogura N (1993) Tokyo Bay – its environmental changes(in Japanese). Koseisha Koseikaku, Tokyo, 193 ppGoogle Scholar
  9. U.S. Fish, Wildlife Service (1981) Ecological Services Manual, Standards for the development of Habitat Suitability Index models, US Fish and Wildlife Service, 103 ESM, 144 pGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Institute for Land Infrastructure ManagementYokosukaJapan

Personalised recommendations