Skip to main content

Evaluation of Artificial Reefs Impact on Artisanal Fisheries: Necessity of Complementary Approaches

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Global Change: Mankind-Marine Environment Interactions
  • 1305 Accesses

Abstract

Currently, fisheries in all oceans are declining as a consequence of overfishing and other phenomena like global warming. Artisanal fisheries in the Mediterranean Sea are following this trend, which is intensified by the high price increase of oil. In this context, some management strategies need to be proposed to maintain both natural stocks and human activities.

Complementary to the quotas and marine protected areas, the artificial reefs may be one part of the solution. Concerning the fisheries context, artificial reefs (AR) can induce new habitats, more or less complex, to allow the development of rocky fish (adult and/or juvenile). Species from sandy bottoms also profit from these artificial structures because they provide protection of adjacent zones from illegal trawling. We study some artificial reefs in the south of Lion’s Gulf (near Le Barcarès/Leucate, Mediterranean Sea) constituted by six “villages” of 12 ha (300 × 400 m). Each zone contains 28 modules of three types: pipes, cubes, and construction debris.

We use different methods to evaluate the effectiveness of artificial reefs:

  • Visual count by diving

  • Observation of commercial landing in each harbor

  • External tagging of fish

Visual census showed a significantly higher species richness and density on ARs than on the control site. Abundance, biomass, and LPUE data (Landings Per Unit of Effort) issued from artisanal fisheries landing surveys were not significantly different around the AR system from other fishing grounds of the French Catalan coast. The tagging experiments on Diplodus sargus suggested that the connectivity of demersal fish populations must be taken into account to evaluate the influence area of ARs and thus their indirect impacts on artisanal fisheries. This study highlights the potential of combining methods covering different spatial scales to evaluate direct and indirect impacts of ARs on artisanal fisheries. Methods for the evaluation of AR efficiency are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abecasis D, Bentes L, Erzini K (2009) Home range, residency and movements of Diplodus sargus and Diplodus vulgaris in a coastal lagoon: Connectivity between nursery and adult habitats. Estuar Coastal Shelf Sci 85(4):525–529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agardy T (2003) An environmentalist’s perspective on responsible fisheries: the need for holistic approaches. In: Responsible fisheries in the marine ecosystem. FAO and CABI, Rome and Wallingford, pp 65–85

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Aldebert Y (1997) Demersal resources of the Gulf of Lions (NW Mediterranean). Impact of exploitation on fish diversity. Vie et Milieu – Life Environ 47(4):275–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Alevizon WS, Gorham JC (1989) Effects of artificial reef deployment on nearby resident fishes. Bull Mar Sci 44(2):646–661

    Google Scholar 

  • Angel DL, Katz T, Eden N, Spanier E, Black KD (2005) Damage control in the coastal zone: improving water quality by harvesting aquaculture-derived nutrients. In: Strategic management of marine ecosystems. Springer, Netherlands, pp 77–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Antsulevich AE (1994) Artificial reefs project for improvement of water quality and environmental enhancement of Neva bay (St.-Petersburg county region). Bull Mar Sci 55(2–3):1189–1192

    Google Scholar 

  • Arena PT, Jordan LKB, Spieler RE (2007) Fish assemblages on sunken vessels and natural reefs in southeast Florida, USA. Hydrobiologia 580(1):157–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashorth JS, Ormond RFG (2005) Effects of fishing pressure and trophic group on abundance and spillover across boundaries of a no-take zone. Biol Conserv 121(3):333–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baine M, Side J (2003) Habitat modification and manipulation as a management tool. Rev Fish Biol Fish 13(2):187–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bayle-Sempere JT, Ramos-Espla AA, Charton JAG (1994) Intra-annual variability of an artificial reef fish assemblage in the marine reserve of Tabarca (Alicante, Spain, Sw Mediterranean). Bull Mar Sci 55(2–3):824–835

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohsack JA, Harper DE, Mcclellan DB, Hulsbeck M (1994) Effects of reef size on colonization and assemblage structure of fishes at artificial reefs off Southeastern Florida, U.S.A. Bull Mar Sci 55(2–3):796–823

    Google Scholar 

  • Bombace G, Fabi G, Fiorentini L, Speranza S (1994) Analysis of the efficacy of artificial reefs located in five different areas of the Adriatic Sea. Bull Mar Sci 55(2–3):559–580

    Google Scholar 

  • Brotto DS, Krohling W, Brum S, Zalmon IR (2006) Usage patterns of an artificial reef by the fish community on the northern coast of Rio de Janeiro – Brazil. J Coast Res 3(39):1266–1280

    Google Scholar 

  • Castilla JC (2000) Roles of experimental marine ecology in coastal management and conservation. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 250(1–2):3–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charbonnel E, Serre C, Ruitton S, Harmelin J-G, Jensen A (2002) Effects of increased habitat complexity on fish assemblages associated with large artificial reef units (French Mediterranean coast). ICES J Mar Sci 59(n. suppl):208–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chou W-R, Tew KS, Fang L-S (2002) Long-term monitoring of the demersal fish community in a steel-slag disposal area in the coastal waters of Kaohsiung, Taiwan. ICES J Mar Sci 59(suppl):238–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark S, Edwards AJ (1994) Use of artificial reef structures to rehabilitate reef flats degraded by coral mining in the Maldives. Bull Mar Sci 55(2–3):724–744

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke KR, Warwick RM (1994) Change in marine communities: an approach to statistical analysis and interpretation. Plymouth Marine Laboratory, Plymouth, 2001, 172 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Claudet J, Pelletier D (2004) Marine protected areas and artificial reefs: a review of the interactions between management and scientific studies. Aquat Living Resour 17(2):129–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Claudet J, Pelletier D, Jouvenel JY, Bachet F, Galzin R (2006) Assessing the effects of marine protected area (MPA) on a reef fish assemblage in a northwestern Mediterranean marine reserve: Identifying community-based indicators. Biol Conserv 130(3):349–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coll J, Moranta J, Renones O, Garcia-Rubies A, Moreno I (1998) Influence of substrate and deployment time on fish assemblages on an artificial reef at Formentera Island (Balearic Islands, western Mediterranean). Hydrobiologia 385(1–3):139–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colloca F, Crespi V, Cerasi S, Coppola SR (2004) Structure and evolution of the artisanal fishery in a southern Italian coastal area. Fish Res 69(3):359–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dupont JM (2008) Artificial reefs as restoration tools: a case study on the West Florida shelf. Coast Manage 36(5):495–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fabi G, Fiorentini L (1994) Comparison between an artificial reef and a control site in the Adriatic Sea: analysis of four years of monitoring. Bull Mar Sci 55(2–3):538–558

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabi G, Grati F, Puletti M, Scarcella G (2004) Effects on fish community induced by installation of two gas platforms in the Adriatic Sea. Mar Ecol Progr Ser 273(1):187–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fao (2004) State of world fisheries and aquaculture. FAO, Rome, p 153

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao QF, Shin PKS, Xu WZ, Cheung SG (2008) Amelioration of marine farming impact on the benthic environment using artificial reefs as biofilters. Mar Pollut Bull 57(6–12):652–661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godoy EAS, Almeida TCM, Zalmon IR (2002) Fish assemblages and environmental variables on an artificial reef north of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. ICES J Mar Sci 59(suppl):138–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gratwicke B, Speight MR (2005) The relationship between fish species richness, abundance and habitat complexity in a range of shallow tropical marine habitats. J Fish Biol 66(3):650–667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grober-Dunsmore R, Frazer TK, Beets JP, Lindberg WJ, Zwick P, Funicelli NA (2008) Influence of landscape structure on reef fish assemblages. Landscape Ecol 23(suppl1):37–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman GD, Jones GP, Seaman WJ (1997) Do artificial reefs increase regional fish production? A review of existing data. Fisheries 22(4):17–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kjerve B (1994) Coastal lagoon processes. Elsevier, London, p 598

    Google Scholar 

  • Lan CH, Lan KT, Hsui CY (2008) Application of fractals: create an artificial habitat with several small (SS) strategy in marine environment. Ecol Eng 32(1):44–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lauck T, Clarck CW, Mangel M, Munro GR (1998) Implementing the precautionary principle in fisheries management through marine reserves. Ecol Appl 8(1 suppl):S72–S78

    Google Scholar 

  • Leihonen P, Hanninen J, Chojnacki J, Vuorinen I (1996) Some prospects of nutrients removal with artificial reefs. Southampton Oceanographic Center, Southampton, England, UK. Proceedings of the First European Artificial Reef Research Network Conference (1996): 85–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Leitao F, Santos MN, Erzini K, Monteiro CC (2009) Diplodus spp. assemblages on artificial reefs: importance for near shore fisheries. Fish Manage Ecol 16(2):88–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lleonart J, Maynou F (2003) Fish stock assessments in the Mediterranean: state of the art. Scientia Marina 67(suppl1):37–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Maci S, Basset A (2009) Composition, structural characteristics and temporal patterns of fish assemblages in non-tidal Mediterranean lagoons: a case study. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 83(4):602–612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pastor J, Astruch P, Prats E, Dalias N, Lenfant P (2008) First scuba diving observations of Pomadasys incisus (Haemulidae) from the French Catalan coast. Cybium 32(2):185–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauly D, Watson R (2003) Counting the last fish. Sci Am 289(1):42–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickering H, Whitmarsh D (1997) Artificial reefs and fisheries exploitation: A review of the “attraction versus production” debate, the influence of design and its significance for policy. Fish Res 31(1–2):39–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickering H, Whitemarsh D, Jensen A (1998) Artificial reefs as a tool to aid rehabilitation of coastal ecosystems: Investigating the potential. Mar Pollut Bull 37(8–12):505–514

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramos J, Santos MN, Whitemarsh D, Monteiro CC (2006) Patterns of use in an artificial reef system: a case study in Portugal. Bull Mar Sci 78(1):203–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed DC, Schroeter SC, Huang D, Aanderson TW, Ambrose RF (2006) Quantitative assessment of different artificial reef designs in mitigating losses to kelp forest fishes. Bull Mar Sci 78(1):133–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Relini M, Torchira G, Relini G (1994) Seasonal variation of fish assemblages in the loano artificial reef (Ligurian Sea Northwestern-Mediterranean). Bull Mar Sci 55(2–3):401–417

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos MN, Monteiro CC (2007) A fourteen-year overview of the fish assemblages and yield of the two oldest Algarve artificial reefs (southern Portugal). Hydrobiologia 580(1):225–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seaman W Jr, Jensen AC (2000) Purposes and practices of artificial reef evaluation. In: Artificial reef evaluation: with application to natural marine habitats. CRC Marine Science Series, CRC Press LLC, Boca Raton, FL, USA, pp 1–20

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sheaves M (2009) Consequences of ecological connectivity: the coastal ecosystem mosaic. Mar Ecol Progr Ser 391:107–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherman RL, Gilliam DS, Spieler RE (2002) Artificial reef design: void space, complexity, and attractants. ICES J Mar Sci 59(suppl):S196–S200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zalmon IR, Novelli R, Gomes MP, Faria VV (2002) Experimental results of an artificial reef program on the Brazilian coast north of Rio de Janeiro. ICES J Mar Sci 59(suppl):S83–S87

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Pastor .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lenfant, P., Pastor, J., Dalias, N., Astruch, P. (2010). Evaluation of Artificial Reefs Impact on Artisanal Fisheries: Necessity of Complementary Approaches. In: Ceccaldi, HJ., Dekeyser, I., Girault, M., Stora, G. (eds) Global Change: Mankind-Marine Environment Interactions. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8630-3_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics