Advertisement

Afterword

  • Keith Horton
  • Chris Roche
Chapter
Part of the Library of Ethics and Applied Philosophy book series (LOET, volume 23)

Abstract

In the final session at the workshop participants discussed some of the issues that they felt had consistently stood out during the course of the previous two days, and focused in particular on what ideas they felt most challenge INGOs’ organisation and practice. Some of these issues corresponded quite closely to the questions identified before the workshop and which are summarised in the introduction. Others, however, emerged during the course of the workshop. We have grouped issues from both these categories into five thematic areas:
  • Approaches to ethics

  • Expectations, roles and obligations of different actors and stakeholders

  • Collective challenges and moral divisions of labour

  • Accountability, knowing and communicating what works and what does not

  • Purpose, direction and ethical challenges for INGOs

Keywords

Collective Action Workshop Participant Refugee Camp Final Session Positive Duty 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Barry, C. 2005. Applying the contribution principle. Metaphilosophy 36(1/2): 210–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bell, D.A. and J.-M. Coicard. 2007. Ethics in Action: The Ethical Challenges of International Human Rights Nongovernmental Organizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Cullity, G. 2004. The Demands of Morality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Keane, J. 2009. The Life and Death of Democracy. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  5. Litovsky, A. and A. MacGillivray. 2007. Development as accountability. AccountAbility 21.Google Scholar
  6. Pogge, T. 2002. World Poverty and Human Rights. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  7. Pogge, T. 2005. Real world justice. The Journal of Ethics 9(1–2): 29–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Pogge, T. 2007. Moral Priorities for International Human Rights NGOs. In Bell and Coicard.Google Scholar
  9. Rondinelli, D. 1993. Projects as Policy Experiments: an Adaptive Approach to Development Administration. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Singer, P. 1972. Famine, affluence, and morality. Philosophy and Public Affairs 1: pp. 229–243.Google Scholar
  11. Singer, P. 1993. Practical Ethics, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Singer, P. 2009. The Life you can Save. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Unger, P. 1996. Living High and Letting Die. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of WollongongWollongongAustralia
  2. 2.Oxfam AustraliaCarltonAustralia

Personalised recommendations