Abstract
This essay outlines how to incorporate morphological rules within the exigencies of our technological age. We propose using the current evolution of Geographical Information Systems (GIS) technologies beyond their original representational domain, towards predictive and dynamic spatial models that help in constructing the new discipline of “urban seeding”. We condemn the high-rise tower block as an unsuitable typology for a living city, and propose to re-establish human-scale urban fabric that resembles the traditional city. Pedestrian presence, density, and movement all reveal that open space between modernist buildings is not urban at all, but neither is the open space found in today’s sprawling suburbs. True urban space contains and encourages pedestrian interactions, and has to be designed and built according to specific rules. The opposition between traditional self-organized versus modernist planned cities challenges the very core of the urban planning discipline. Planning has to be re-framed from being a tool creating a fixed future to become a visionary adaptive tool of dynamic states in evolution.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alexander, C. (2001–2005) The nature of order, Books 1–4, Center for Environmental Structure. (Berkeley, CA, USA). Book 1: The phenomenon of life, 2001; Book 2: The process of creating life, 2002; Book 3: A vision of a living world, 2005; Book 4: The luminous ground, 2004
Alexander, C., Ishikawa, S., Silverstein, M., Jacobson, M., Fiksdahl-King, I. & Angel S. (1977). A pattern language. (New York: Oxford University Press)
Alexander, C., Neis, H., Anninou, A. & King, I. (1987). A new theory of urban design. (New York: Oxford University Press)
Batty, M. (2002). A decade of GIS: what next? Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 29, 157–158
Batty, M. (2008) Whither network science? Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 35, 569–571
Batty, M. & Longley, P.A. (1994). Fractal cities: a geometry of form and function. (London: Academic Press)
Bertuglia C.S. & Staricco, L. (2000). Complessità, Autoorganizzazione, Città, Franco Angeli. Milan, Italy (in Italian)
Boccaletti, S., Latora, V., Moreno, Y., Chavez, M. & Wang, D. (2006). Complex networks: structure and dynamics. Physics reports, 424, 175–308
Campagna M. (Ed.) (2005) GIS for sustainable development. (London: CRC Press)
Caniggia, G. & Maffei, G.L. (2001). Architectural composition and building typology. (Florence, Italy: Alinea Editrice)
Carver, S. (2001). Public participation using web-based GIS. Environment and planning B: Planning and design, 28, 803–804
Donnay, J., Barnsley, M.J. & Longley, P.A, (Eds.) (2001). Remote sensing and urban analysis. (London, UK: Taylor and Francis)
Faust, N.L. (1995). The virtual reality of GIS. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 22, 257–268
Gehl, J. (1996). Life between buildings: using public space. (Copenhagen, Denmark: Arkitektens Forlag)
Golicnik, B. (2007). GIS behavior mapping for provision of interactive empirical knowledge. In K. Thwaites, O. Romice, S. Porta & M. Greaves (Eds.), Urban sustainability through environmental design: Approaches to time, people and place responsive urban spaces (pp. 136–140). (Abingdon: Routledge, Milton Park)
Granovetter, M (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360–1380
Hall, R. (2008). Planning for walkable streets. In T. Haas (Ed.), New urbanism & beyond: Designing cities for the future (pp. 153–157). (New York: Rizzoli)
Harris, A. (2008). Complex systems theories for understanding. [electronic version]. Retrieved from www.iaacblog.com/complexsystems/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/final-complex syte-ms.pdf
Jacobs, A.B., Macdonald, E. & Rofè, Y. (2003). The boulevard book: history, evolution, design of multiway boulevards. (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press)
Jiang, B. & Claramunt, C. (2002). Integration of space syntax into GIS: new perspectives for urban morphology. Transactions in GIS, 6, 295–309
Kellert, S.R., Heerwagen, J. & Mador, M. (2008). Biophilic design: the theory, science and practice of bringing buildings to life. (New York: John Wiley)
Krier, L. (1998). Architecture: choice or fate. (Windsor: Andreas Papadakis Publisher).
Lynch, K. (1981). A theory of good city form. (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press)
Marzot, N. (2002). The study of urban form in Italy. Urban Morphology, 6(2), 59–73
Oliva-i-Casas, J. (2001). Confusion in urban design. (Amsterdam, Holland: Techne Press)
Porta, S. (1999). The community and public spaces. Futures, 31, 437–456
Porta, S. (2008). The world’s longest mistake? Sustainable urban design and the renovation of social housing estates. Urban Scrawl, 2, 18–21, Retrieved from humanspacelab.com/UploadedFiles/PA2008_05.pdf
Porta, S., Latora, V. & Crucitti, P. (2006). The network analysis of urban streets: a primal approach, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 33, 705–725
Salingaros, N.A. (2005). Principles of urban structure. (Amsterdam, Holland: Techne Press)
Salingaros, N.A., Brain, D., Duany, A.M., Mehaffy, M.W. & Philibert-Petit, E. (2006). Favelas and social housing: the urbanism of self-organization. Presented at the Brazilian and Ibero-American Congress on Social Housing, Florianópolis, Brazil, 2006
Salingaros, N.A. & Masden K.G. (2008). Neuroscience, the natural environment, and building design. In S.R. Kellert, J. Heerwagen & M. Mador (Eds.), Biophilic design: the theory, science and practice of bringing buildings to life (pp. 59–83). (New York: John Wiley)
Schocken, H. (2003). Intimate anonymity: breaking the code of the urban genome. INTBAU Essays, 1(5), Retrieved from www.intbau.org/essay5.htm
Senseable City Lab (2006) Real time rome, massachusetts institute of technology, Cambridge MA, USA. http://senseable.mit.edu/realtimerome/
Steil, L., Salingaros, N.A. & Mehaffy, M.W. (2008). Growing sustainable suburbs: an incremental strategy for reconstructing sprawl. In T. Haas (Ed.), New urbanism & beyond: designing cities for the future (pp. 262–274). (New York: Rizzoli)
Thwaites, K. & Simkins, I. (2007). Experiential landscape: an approach to people, place and space. (Abingdon: Routledge, Milton Park)
Wagner, D.F. (1997). Cellular automata and geographic information systems. Environment and planning B: Planning and design, 24, 219–234
Whyte, W.H. (1988). City: rediscovering the center. (New York: Doubleday)
Acknowledgments
This essay began as a series of online conversations between one of us (PP) and Vilma Torselli, who we thank for her inspiring comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pagliardini, P., Porta, S., Salingaros, N.A. (2010). Geospatial Analysis and Living Urban Geometry. In: Jiang, B., Yao, X. (eds) Geospatial Analysis and Modelling of Urban Structure and Dynamics. GeoJournal Library, vol 99. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8572-6_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8572-6_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-8571-9
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-8572-6
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)