Advertisement

The Research Design of the Study

  • Robert M. McKenzie
Chapter
Part of the Educational Linguistics book series (EDUL, volume 10)

Abstract

This chapter gives a detailed description of the research design of the study. First, the objectives of the study and the research questions are outlined. The chapter continues with a description of and justification for the varieties of English speech selected for evaluation and provides background information on the speakers. The chapter then discusses the choice of background variables and gives an overview of the sample employed in the study. The chapter also provides an account of and rationale for each of the research instruments employed and describes the implications of the findings from the pilot study. Finally, an outline is given of the data collection procedure of the main study.

Keywords

Native Speaker Language Policy Research Instrument Speech Sample Stimulus Speech 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Donahue, R.T. 1998. Japanese culture and communication. Lanham: University Press of America.Google Scholar
  2. Matsuura, H., R. Chiba, and M. Fujieda 1999. Intelligibility and comprehensibility of American and Irish Englishes in Japan. World Englishes 18(1):49–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dewaele, J.M. 2005. Sociodemographic, psychological, politicocultural correlates in Flemish students’ attitudes towards French and English. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 26(2):118–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Garrett, P., N. Coupland, and A. Williams. 2003. Investigating language attitudes. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.Google Scholar
  5. Starks, D., and B. Paltridge. 1996. A note on using sociolinguistic methods to study non-native attitudes towards English. World Englishes 15(2):217–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Niedzielski, N. 2002. Attitudes toward Midwestern American English. In Handbook of perceptual dialectology, eds. D. Long and D.R. Preston, vol. 2, 321–328. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  7. Carroll, T. 2001a. Language planning and language change in Japan. Richmond: Curzon.Google Scholar
  8. Macafee, C. 1994. Traditional dialect in the modern world: A Glasgow case study. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Lippi-Green, R. 1997. English with an accent. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Cohen, L., L. Manion, and K. Morrison. 2000. Research methods in education, 5th ed. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Preston, D.R. 1993. The uses of folk linguistics. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 3:181–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hartley, L.C. 1999. A view from the west: Receptions of US dialects by Oregon residents. In Handbook of perceptual dialectology, ed. D.R. Preston, vol. 1, 315–332. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  13. Maher, J.C., and K. Yashiro. 1995. Multilingual Japan: An introduction. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 16(1/2):1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Stuart-Smith, J. 1999. Glasgow: Accent and voice quality. In Urban voices, eds. P. Foulkes and G. Docherty, 203–222. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
  15. Lindemann, S. 2003. Koreans, Chinese or Indians? Attitudes and ideologies about non-native English speakers in the United States. Journal of Sociolinguistics 7(3):348–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chiba, R., H. Matsuura, and A. Yamamoto. 1995. Japanese attitudes toward English accents. World Englishes 14(1):77–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Baker, C. 1992. Attitudes and language. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  18. Van Bezooijen, R., and C. Gooskens. 1997. Identification of language varieties: The contribution of different linguistic levels. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 18(1):31–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Williams, A., P. Garrett, and N. Coupland. 1999. Dialect recognition. In Handbook of perceptual dialectology, ed. D.R. Preston, vol. 1, 345–358. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  20. Fought, C. 2002. California students’ perceptions of, you know, regions and dialects? In Handbook of perceptual dialectology, eds. D. Long and D.R. Preston, vol. 2, 113–134. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  21. Peterson, R.S., D.B. Smith, and P.V. Martorana. 2006. Choosing between a rock and a hard place when data are scarce and the questions important: Reply to Hollenbeck, DeRue and Mannor 2006. Journal of Applied Psychology 91(1):6–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Preston, D.R. 1986. Five visions of America. Language in Society 15:221–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rasinger, S.M. 2008. Quantitative research in linguistics. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  24. Dornyei, Z., and R. Clement. 2001. Motivational characteristics of learning different target languages. In Motivation and second language acquisition, eds. Z. Dornyei and R. Schmidt, 399–432. Honolulu: University of Hawaii.Google Scholar
  25. Dornyei, Z., K. Csizer, and N. Nemeth. 2006. Motivation, language attitudes and globalization. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  26. McKenzie, R.M. 2004. Attitudes of Japanese nationals towards standard and non-standard varieties of Scottish English speech. The East Asian Learner 1(1):16–25.Google Scholar
  27. Preston, D.R. 2004. Language attitudes to speech. In Language in the USA, eds. E. Finegan and J.R. Rickford, 480–492. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Giles, H., and N. Coupland. 1991. Language: Context and consequences. Milton Keynes: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Loveday, L. 1996. Language contact in Japan. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  30. McKenzie, R.M. 2003. Attitudes of Japanese nationals resident in Scotland towards standard and non-standard varieties of English. Saga University Economic Review 35(5/6):137–150.Google Scholar
  31. Dalton-Puffer, C., G. Kaltenboeck, and U. Smit. 1997. Learner attitudes and L2 pronunciation in Austria. World Englishes 16(1):115–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lindemann, S. 2002. Listening with an attitude: A model of native-speaker comprehension of non-native speakers in the United States. Language in Society 31:419–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Savage, M. 2000. Class analysis and social transformation. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  34. MacIntyre, P.D., R. Clement, Z. Dornyei, and K.A. Noels. 1998. Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in a L2: A situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation. The Modern Language Journal 82:545–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Dornyei, Z. 2007. Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Macauley, R. 1977. Language, social class and education. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Preston, D.R. 1989. Sociolinguistics and second language acquisition. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  38. Jowell, R., M. Kaese, R. Fitzgerald, and G. Eva. 2007. The European social survey as a measurement model. In Measuring attitudes cross-nationally, eds. R. Jowell, C. Roberts, R. Fitzgerald, and G. Eva, 1–32. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Dailey, R.M., H. Giles, and L.L. Jansma. 2005. Language attitudes in an Anglo-Hispanic context: The role of the linguistic landscape. Language and Communication 25(1):27–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Yashima, T., L. Zenuk-Nishide, and K. Shimuzu. 2004. The influence of attitudes and affect on willingness to communicate and second language communication. Language Learning 54(1):119–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Fukuchi, N.T., and R. Sakomoto. 2005. Affective dimensions of the Japanese foreign language learner: Implications for psychological learner development in Japan. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 26(4):333–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Stanlaw, J. 2004. Japanese English: Language and culture contact. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Davies, R.S. 2008. Designing a response scale to improve average group response reliability. Evaluation and Research in Education 21(2):134–146.Google Scholar
  44. Hollenbeck, J.R., D.S. DeRue, and M. Mannor. 2006. Statistical power and parameter stability when subjects are few and tests are many: Comment on Peterson, Smith, Martorana and Owens 2003. Journal of Applied Psychology 91(1):1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Milroy, L. 2001. The social categories of race and class: Language ideology and sociolinguistics. In Sociolinguistics and social theory, eds. N. Coupland, S. Sarangi, and C.N. Candlin, 235–260. Harlow: Pearson.Google Scholar
  46. Oppenheim, A. 1992. Questionnaire design, interviewing and attitude measurement. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  47. El-Dash, L., and J. Busnardo. 2001. Brazilian attitudes towards English: Dimensions of status and solidarity. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 11(1):57–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Hiraga, Y. 2005. British attitudes towards six varieties of English in the USA and Britain. World Englishes 24(3):289–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Milroy, L. 1999b. Standard English and language ideology in Britain and the United States. In Standard English: The widening debate, eds. T. Bex and R.J. Watts, 173–206. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  50. Dornyei, Z. 2003. Questionnaires in second language research. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.English Language and LinguisticsNorthumbria UniversityNewcastle Upon TyneUK

Personalised recommendations