Abstract
This chapter argues that critical pedagogy based within relational, participatory ways of knowing science provides a well-grounded rationale for change in science education. This argument is based on the notion that changing curriculum and pedagogy involves fundamental questions of teacher’s and student’s worldviews that have not been addressed in past attempts at change. Because the discourses of science (education) are socially constructed, understanding how young people come to construct meaning and knowledge in their science studies through social learning seems a promising way to accommodate socioecological, political, and cultural issues within a newly conceptualized science education.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Pinar et al.’s (1995) skepticism is in response to Kliebard’s (1986) discussion of discourses on curriculum where “humanists” were characterized as guardians of an ancient tradition linked to the power of reason and elements of Western cultural heritage. This tradition is associated in American curriculum debates with “academic rationalists,” a group quite distinct from the “reconceptualists” where, arguably, many critical environmental educators ground their curriculum theorizing (Apple 1975; Giroux 1981).
- 2.
School science is used here because the onto-epistemological frames have widened within science education proper.
- 3.
Employing the term “text” (as in intertextually) acknowledges that the field of curriculum is composed of various discourses and suggests issues involved in understanding science education curriculum and pedagogy that have been ignored prior to post-critical or poststructural mappings of the field. Thus, textualist mappings of science education have links to poststructuralism.
References
Aikenhead, G. (2006). Science education for everyday life: Evidence-based practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
Aikenhead, G., & Michell, H. (2011). Bridging cultures: Indigenous and scientific ways of knowing nature. Don Mills, ON: Pearson.
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (1993). Benchmarks for scientific literacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Apple, M. (1975). Scientific interests and the nature of educational institutions. In W. Pinar (Ed.), Curriculum theorizing: The reconceptualists (pp. 120–130). Berkeley: McCutchan.
Barrett, M. J., Hart, P., Nolan, K., & Sammel, A. (2005). Challenges in implementing action-oriented sustainability education. In L. Filho (Ed.), Handbook of sustainability research (pp. 507–534). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
Biesta, G. (1999). Radical intersubjectivity: Reflections on the ‘different’ foundation of education. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 18, 203–220.
Biesta, G. (2006). Beyond learning: Democratic education for a human future. Bounder, CO: Paradigm.
Blades, D. (1997). Procedures of power & curriculum change. New York: Peter Lang.
Blades, D. (2001). The simulacra of science education. In J. Weaver, M. Morris, & P. Appelbaum (Eds.), (Post) modern science (education) (pp. 57–94). New York: Peter Lang.
Blades, D. (2008). Positive growth: Developments in the philosophy of science education. Curriculum Inquiry, 38(4), 387–399.
Bonnett, M. (2004). Retrieving nature: Education for a post-humanist age. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Britzman, D. (2000). “The question of belief”: Writing poststructural ethnography. In E. St. Pierre & W. Pillow (Eds.), Working the ruins: Feminist poststructural theory and methods in education (pp. 27–40). New York: Routledge.
Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bruner, J. (1991). The narrative construction of reality. Critical Inquiry, 18, 1–21.
Butler, J. (1995). Contingent foundations: Feminism and the question of ‘postmodernism. In S. Benhabib, J. Butler, D. Cornell, & N. Fraser (Eds.), Feminist contentions: A philosophical exchange (pp. 35–57). New York: Routledge.
Buzzati-Traverso, A. (1977). Some thoughts on the philosophy of environmental education. In UNESCO (Ed.), Trends in environmental education. Paris: UNESCO.
Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (1983). Becoming critical: Knowing through action research (ECT432/732 Action Research in Curriculum). Victoria, Australia: Deakin University.
Cheney, J. (1989). Postmodern environmental ethics: Ethics as bioregional narrative. Environmental Ethics, 11(2), 117–136.
Codd, J. (1983). Educational research as political practice. Paper presented to the National Conference of the Australian Association for Research in Education, Canberra.
Corrigan, D., Dillon, J., & Gunstone, R. (Eds.). (2007). The re-emergence of values in science education. Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense.
Council of Ministers of Education, Canada (CMEC). (1997). Common framework of science learning outcomes. Toronto: CMEC Secretariat.
Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social science: Meaning and perspective in the research process. London: Sage.
Davies, B. (2003). Shards of glass: Children reading and writing beyond gendered identities. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
Davies, B. (2006). Subjectification: The relevance of Butler’s analysis for education. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 27(4), 425–438.
Davies, B., & Harré, R. (1990). Positioning: The discursive production of selves. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 20(1), 43–63.
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Désautels, J., Fleury, S., & Garrison, J. (2002). The enactment of epistemological practice as subversive social action, the provocation of power, an anti-modernism. In W.-M. Roth & J. Désautels (Eds.), Science education as/for sociopolitical action (pp. 237–269). New York: Peter Lang.
Dillon, J., & Gill, P. (2001). Risk, environment and health: Aspects of policy and practice. School Science Review, 83, 65–73.
Donnelly, J. (2002). Instrumentality, hermeneutics and the place of science in the school curriculum. Science Education, 11, 135–153.
Edley, N. (2001). Analysing masculinity: Interpretive repertoires, subject positions and ideological dilemmas. In M. Wetherell, S. Taylor, & S. Yates (Eds.), Discourses as data: A guide for analysis. London: Sage.
Edwards, D., & Potter, J. (1992). Discursive psychology. London: Sage.
Fendler, L., & Tuckey, S. (2006). Whose literacy? Discursive constructions of life and objectivity. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 38(5), 589–606.
Fensham, P. (1976). A report on the Belgrade workshop on environmental education. Canberra: Curriculum Development Centre.
Fien, J. (1993). Education for the environment: Critical curriculum theorizing and environmental education. Geelong, Victoria, Australia: Deakin University Press.
Fien, J. (2003). Learning to care: Education and compassion. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 19, 1–3.
Gergen, K. (1985). The social constructionist movement in modern psychology. American Psychologist, 40(3), 266–275.
Giroux, H. (1981). Pedagogy, pessimism and the politics of conformity: A reply to Linda McNeil. Curriculum Inquiry, 11(3), 211–222.
Gough, N. (1994). Playing at catastrophe: Ecopolitical education after poststructuralism. Educational Theory, 44(2), 189–210.
Greenwood, D. (2008). A critical pedagogy of place: From gridlock to parallax. Environmental Education Research, 14(3), 336–348.
Gutiérrez, K., & Rogoff, B. (2003). Cultural ways of learning: Individual traits or repertories of practice. Educational Researcher, 32(5), 19–25.
Gutiérrez, K., Hunter, J., & Arzubiaga, A. (2009). Re-mediating the university: Learning through sociocritical literacies. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 4, 1–23.
Habermas, J. (1971). Towards a rational society. London: Heinemann.
Haraway, D. (1991). Simians, cyborgs and women: The reinvention of nature. London: Free Association.
Harding, S. (1986). The science question in feminism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Hart, P. (2003). Teachers’ thinking in environmental education: Consciousness and responsibility. New York: Peter Lang.
Hart, P. (2010). No long a little added frill: The transformative potential of environmental education for educational change. Teacher Education Quarterly, 37(4).
Hodson, D. (1994). Seeking directions for change: The personalization and politicization of science education. Curriculum Studies, 2(1), 71–98.
Hodson, D. (1998a). Science fiction: The continuing misrepresentation of science in the school curriculum. Curriculum Studies, 6(2), 191–216.
Hodson, D. (1998b). Teaching and learning science. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
Hodson, D. (2003). Time for action: Science education for an alternative future. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 645–670.
Hughes, G. (2000). Marginalization of socioscientific material in science-technology-society science curricula: Some implications for gender inclusivity and curriculum reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(5), 426–440.
Jenkins, E. (2002). Linking school science education with action. In W.-M. Roth & J. Desautels (Eds.), History and philosophy of science in science education (Vol. 1). Kingston: Queen’s University.
Jenkins, E. (2003). Environmental education and the public understanding of science. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 1(8), 437–443.
Jenkins, E. (2007). School science: A questionable construct? Journal of Curriculum Studies, 39(3), 265–282.
Kahn, R., & Lewis, T. (2010). Education out of bounds: Reimagining cultural studies for a posthuman age. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
Kliebard, H. (1986). The rise of scientific curriculum making and its aftermath. Curriculum Theory Network, 5(1), 27–37.
Lave, J. (1996). Teaching as learning, in practice. Mind, Culture & Activity, 3(3), 149–164.
Lemke, J. (2000). Articulating communities: Sociocultural perspectives on science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(3), 296–316.
Lock, R., & Ratcliffe, M. (1998). Learning about social and ethical applications of science. In M. Ratcliffe (Ed.), ASE guide to secondary education (pp. 109–117). London: Stanley Thomas.
McKenzie, M. (2004). The ‘willful contradiction’ of postmodern socio-ecological education. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 9, 177–190.
McKenzie, M. (2008). The places of pedagogy: Or, what we can do with culture through intersubjective experiences. Environmental Education Research, 14(3), 361–373.
Meyers, R., Brody, M., Dillon, J., Hart, P., Krasney, M., Monroe, M., Russell, C., & Wals, A. (2007). Towards creating an inclusive community of researchers: The first three years of the North American Association for Environmental Education research symposium. Environmental Education Research, 13(5), 639–662.
Millar, R., & Osborne, J. (Eds.). (1998). Beyond 2000: Science education for the future. London: King’s College London School of Education.
Nolan, K. (2007). How should I know? Preservice teachers’ images of knowing (by heart) in mathematics and science. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
O’Neill, D., & Polman, J. (2004). Why education ‘little scientists?’ Examining the potential of practice-based scientific literacy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 234–266.
Pile, S., & Thrift, N. (Eds.). (1995). Mapping the subject: Geographies of cultural transformation. London: Routledge.
Pinar, W., Reynolds, W., Slattery, P., & Taubman, P. (1995). Understanding curriculum. New York: Peter Lang.
Popkewitz, T. (1984). Paradigm and ideology in educational research: The social functions of the intellectual. London: Falmer.
Popkewitz, T. (2002). How the alchemy makes inquiry, evidence, and exclusion. Journal of Teacher Education, 53, 262–267.
Posch, P., Hart, P., Kyburz-Graber, R., & Robottom, I. (Eds.). (2006). Approaching reflective practice in teacher education – Learning from case studies in environmental education. Bern: Peter Lang.
Probyn, E. (2003). The spatial imperative of subjectivity. In K. Anderson, M. Domosh, S. Pile, & N. Thrift (Eds.), Handbook of cultural geography (pp. 290–299). London: Sage.
Rivard, L., & Straw, S. (2000). The effect of talk and writing on learning science: An exploratory study. Science Education, 84, 566–593.
Robottom, I. (Ed.). (1987). Environmental education: Practice and possibility. Geelong, Victoria, Australia: Deakin University Press.
Robottom, I. (1988). Science-education: Exploring the tension. Geelong, Victoria, Australia: Deakin University Press.
Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. New York: Oxford University Press.
Rogoff, B., & Lave, J. (Eds.). (1984). Everyday cognition: Its development in social context. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Roth, W.-M. (2007). The ethico-moral nature of identity: Prolegomena to the development of third-generation Cultural-Historical Activity Theory. International Journal of Educational Research, 46, 83–93.
Roth, W.-M., & Désautels, J. (2002). Science education as/for sociopolitical action. New York: Peter Lang.
Roth, W.-M., & Désautels, J. (2004). Educating for citizenship: Reappraising the role of science education. Canadian Journal for Science, Mathematics, and Technology Education, 4, 149–168.
Roth, W.-M., & Duit, R. (2003). Emergence, flexibility, and stabilization of language in a physics classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 869–897.
Russell, C. (2005). Whoever does not write is written: The role of nature in post-post approaches to environmental education research. Environmental Education Research, 11(5), 433–443.
Russell, J., White, P., Fook, T., Kayira, J., Müller, S., & Oakley, J. (2010). Graduate students lend their voices: Reflections on the 10th seminar in health and environmental education research. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 15, 74–85.
Shamos, M. (1995). The myth of scientific literacy. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Schultz, R. (2007). Lyotard, postmodernism and science education: A rejoinder to Zembylas. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 39, 633–656.
Stables, A., & Scott, W. (2001). Post-humanist liberal pragmatism? environmental education out of modernity. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 35, 269–279.
Stevenson, R. (1987). Schooling and environmental education: Contradictions in purpose and practice. In I. Robottom (Ed.), Environmental education: Practice and possibility (pp. 69–82). Geelong, Victoria, Australia: Deakin University Press.
Stevenson, R. (2007). Schooling and environmental/sustainability education: From discourses of policy and practice to discourses of professional learning. Environmental Education Research, 13(2), 265–285.
St. Pierre, E. (2000). The call for intelligibility in postmodern educational research. Educational Researcher, 29(5), 25–28.
Taylor, S. (2006). Narrative as construction and discursive resource. Narrative Inquiry, 16(1), 94–102.
Walkerdine, V. (1995). Subject to change without notice. In S. Pile & N. Thrift (Eds.), Mapping the subject: Geographies of cultural transformation (pp. 309–331). London: Routledge.
Weaver, J., Morris, M., & Appelbaum, P. (Eds.). (2001). (Post) modern science (education). New York: Peter Lang.
Wells, G. (2000). Dialogic inquiry in education: Building on the legacy of Vygotsky. In C. Lee & P. Smagorinsky (Eds.), Vygotskian perspectives on literary research: Constructing meaning through collaborative inquiry (pp. 51–85). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wells, G. (2007). Who we become depends on the company we keep and on what we do and say together. International Journal of Educational Research, 46, 100–103.
Wetherell, M. (1998). Positioning and interpretive repertoires: Conversation analysis and post-structuralism in dialogue. Discourse & Society, 9, 387–412.
Wetherell, M., & Potter, J. (1992). Mapping the language of racism: Discourse and the legitimation of exploitation. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Whatmore, S. (1999). Hybrid geographies: Rethinking the human in human geography. In D. Massey, J. Allen, & P. Sarre (Eds.), Human geography today (pp. 22–39). Cambridge: Polity.
Winch, C. (2004). Developing critical rationality as a pedagogical aim. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 38(3), 467–484.
Woolgar, S. (1986). On the alleged distinction between discourse and praxis. Social Studies of Science, 16(2), 309–317.
Yore, L., Hand, B., & Florence, M. (2004). Scientists’ views of science: Models of writing, and science writing practices. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 338–369.
Zembylas, M. (2007). Introduction. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 38(5), 585–587.
Zembylas, M. (2008). The unbearable lightness of representing ‘reality’ in science education: A response to Schultz. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 40(4), 494–514.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hart, P. (2012). Creating Spaces for Rethinking School Science: Perspectives from Subjective and Social–Relational Ways of Knowing. In: Zeyer, A., Kyburz-Graber, R. (eds) Science | Environment | Health. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3949-1_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3949-1_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-3948-4
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-3949-1
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)