Science, Environment and Health Education: Towards a Reconceptualisation of Their Mutual Interdependences
This chapter looks at the argument for a reconceptualisation of the mutual interdependence which would result in a novel and empowering science/environment/health curriculum and an associated pedagogy. Whereas science education is widely regarded as a core subject in the curriculum, health and environmental education are more likely to be seen as cross-cutting themes if they appear anywhere. The general sense of dissatisfaction with the existing science curriculum in many countries provides an opportunity to consider a radical reform based on educational soundness and relevancy rather than political expediency.
- Bonney, R., Ballard, H., Jordan, R., McCallie, E., Phillips, T., Shirk, J., & Wilderman, C. C. (2009). Public participation in scientific research: Defining the field and assessing its potential for informal science education. A CAISE Inquiry Group Report, Washington, DC: Center for Advancement of Informal Science Education (CAISE).Google Scholar
- Cowell, D., & Watkins, R. (2007). Get out of the classroom to study climate change—the “Spring Bulbs for Schools” project. Primary Science Review, 97, 25–28.Google Scholar
- Department for Education (DfE). (2010). The importance of teaching: Schools white paper. London: DfE. Available at: http://publications.education.gov.uk/eOrderingDownload/CM-7980.pdf.
- Dillon, J. (2009). On scientific literacy and curriculum reform. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 4(3), 201–213.Google Scholar
- Dillon, J., & Gill, P. (2001). Risk, environment and health: aspects of policy and practice. School Science Review, 83(303), 65–73.Google Scholar
- ESRC Global Environmental Change Programme. (2000). Risky choices, soft disasters: Environmental decision making under uncertainty. Brighton: University of Sussex. Retrieved from, http://infohouse.p2ric.org/ref/12/11013.pdf, on March 31, 2012.
- Fensham, P. J., & May, J. B. (1979). Servant not master—a new role for science in a core of environmental education. Australian Science Teachers’ Journal, 25, 15–24.Google Scholar
- Glasgow Centre for Population Health (2010). Developing capacity for effective action to tackle health inequalities. Available at: http://www.gcph.co.uk/work_programmes/local_authority_role/healthy_school_food_policy
- Gordon, T. (2010). Cost of obesity could reach £3bn a year and hurt economic growth, heraldscotland (February 21, 2010). Available at: http://www.heraldscotland.com/news/health/cost-of-obesity-could-reach-3bn-a-year-and-hurt-economic-growth-1.1008165.
- Jensen, B. B. (1995). Teaching for and with democracy. In D. Colquhoun, K. Goltz, M. Sheehan, & B. Marshall (Eds.), The proceedings of the inaugural national health promoting schools conference. Geelong: Deakin University.Google Scholar
- Jensen, B. B., Schnack, K., & Simovska, V. (2002). Critical environmental and health education research issues and challenges. Copenhagen: Research Centre for Environmental and Health Education, University of Education.Google Scholar
- Maller, C. (2005). Hands–on contact with nature in primary schools as a catalyst for developing a sense of community and cultivating mental health and wellbeing. Eingana, 28, 16–21.Google Scholar
- Martin, M. O., Mullis, I. V. S., Gonzales, E. J., Gregory, K. D., Smith, T. A., Chrostowski, S. J., Garden, R. A., & O’Connor, K. M. (2000). TIMSS 1999 international science report: Findings from IEA’s repeat of the third internationalmathematics and science study at the eighth grade. Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College. National Institute for Educational Research: Tokyo.Google Scholar
- NASA. (2009). NASA announces climate change education funding opportunity. Press release 09–131. Available at: http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2009/jun/HQ_09-131_Edu_Climate_Opp.html.
- Osborne, J., & Dillon, J. (2008). Science education in Europe: Critical reflections. London: Nuffield Foundation.Google Scholar
- Roberts, D. A. (2007). Opening remarks. In C. Linder, L. Östman, & P.-O. Wickman, (Eds.), Promoting scientific literacy: Science education research in transaction. Proceedings of the Linnaeus Tercentenary Symposium (9–17). Uppsala: Uppsala University.Google Scholar
- Sjøberg, S., & Schreiner, C. (2005). How do learners in different cultures relate to science and technology? Results and perspectives from the project ROSE. Asia Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 6, 1–16.Google Scholar
- Tse, V. (2010). Swedish pupils slide in new global ranking. The Local (December 7, 2010). Available at: http://www.thelocal.se/30668/20101207/
- UNESCO (1978) Intergovernmental conference on environmental education: Tbilisi (USSR), 14–26 October 1977. Final report. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
- Vosniadou, S. (2001). How children learn. Brussels: International Academy of Education.Google Scholar
- Wals, A. E. J., & Dillon, J. (forthcoming). Learning theories and their implications for environmental education research. In, R. B. Stevenson, M. Brody, J. Dillon, & A. E. J. Wals, (Eds.), International Handbook of Research in Environmental Education. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Webster, K. (1996). The secondary years. In J. Huckle & S. Sterling (Eds.), Education for Sustainability (pp. 72–85). London: Earthscan.Google Scholar