Skip to main content

Scientific Literacy in Environmental and Health Education

  • Chapter
Science | Environment | Health

Abstract

Grand challenges for this age set the stage for this chapter. Because many challenges are directly related to the environment and health, one must ask a question that introduces the theme of scientific literacy—“What is important for citizens to know, value, and be able to do relative to the environment, health, and science-related issues?” The chapter continues with a review of results from the Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2006 science survey. The discussion includes a definition of scientific literacy, presentation of results for students’ attitudes toward selected environmental issues, and students’ interests in selected health issues. The chapter concludes with implications for enhancing scientific literacy using environmental and health contexts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    An earlier version of the following analysis can be found in McCrae (2009).

  2. 2.

    PISA scales are constructed with a mean of 500 and a standard deviation of 100.

  3. 3.

    Topics are ranked according to how difficult it was for students to express interest in learning about them. Often, however, there was no significant difference in the difficulties of two or three items that have successive ranks.

References

  • Bloom, B. R. (2010, May 14 ). Support for global health. Editorial. Science, 328, 791.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bybee, R. (1979a). Science education and the emerging ecological society. Science Education, 63(1), 95–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bybee, R. (1979b). Science education for an ecological society. American Biology Teacher, 41(3), 154–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bybee, R. (1979c). Science education policies for an ecological society: Aims and goals. Science Education, 63(2), 245–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bybee, R. (1991). Planet earth in crisis: How should science educators respond? American Biology Teacher, 53(3), 146–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bybee, R. (1997). Achieving scientific literacy: From purposes to practices. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bybee, R. (2008). Scientific literacy, environmental issues, and PISA 2006: The 2008 Paul F-Brandwein lecture. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17, 566–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bybee, R. (2010). The teaching of science: 21st century perspectives. Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bybee, R., & Mau, T. (1986). Science and technology related global problems: An international survey of science educators. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 23(7), 599–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bybee, R., & McCrae, B. (2011). Scientific literacy and student attitudes: Perspectives from PISA 2006 science. International Journal of Science Education, 33(1), 7–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bybee, R., McCrae, B., & Laurie, R. (2009). PISA 2006: An assessment of scientific literacy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(8), 865–883.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bybee, R., Taylor, J., Gardner, A., Van Scotter, P., Powell, J., Westbrook, A., & Landes, N. (2006). The BSCS 5E instructional model: Origins, effectiveness, and applications. Colorado Springs, CO: BSCS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coussens, C. (Ed.). (2009). Global environmental health: Research gaps and barriers for providing sustainable water, sanitation, and hygiene services. Workshop Summary. Institute of Medicine of the National Academies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press

    Google Scholar 

  • DeBoer, G. (1991). A history of ideas in science education: Implications for practice. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duschl, R. A., & Grandy, R. E. (Eds.). (2008). Teaching scientific inquiry. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fensham, P. (2000). Time to change drivers for scientific literacy. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics, and Technology Education, 2, 9–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fensham, P. (2009). Real world contexts in PISA science: Implications for context-based science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(8), 884–896.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flick, L. B., & Lederman, N. G. (Eds.). (2004). Scientific inquiry and nature of science. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, L., & Coussens, C. (Eds.). (2004). Environmental health indicators: Bridging the chasm of public health and the environment. Workshop Summary. Institute of Medicine of the National Academies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, B., Fischhoff, B., Marcus, S., & Coussens, C. (Eds.). (2003). Ensuring environmental health in postindustrial cities. Workshop Summary. Institute of Medicine of the National Academies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holdren, J. (2008, January 25). Science and technology for sustainable well-being. Science, 319, 424–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurd, P. D. (1958). Science literacy: Its meaning for American schools. Educational Leadership, 16(1), 13–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, J. (2009, December 18). Reflections on: Our planet and its life, origins, and futures. Science, 236, 1646–1655.

    Google Scholar 

  • McComas, W. F. (Ed.). (1998). The nature of science in science education. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, B. J. (2009). What science do students want to learn? In R. W. Bybee & B. J. McCrae (Eds.), PISA Science 2006: Implications for science teachers and teaching (pp. 149–162). Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Omenn, G. (2006, December 15). Grand challenges and great opportunities in science, technology, and public policy. Science, 314, 1696–1704.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2009). Green at fifteen: How 15-year-olds perform in environmental science and geoscience in PISA 2006. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2006). Assessing scientific, reading and mathematical literacy: A framework for PISA 2006. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, J. (2007). Science education for the twenty first century. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 3(3), 173–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, J., & Collins, S. (2001). Pupils’ views of the role and value of the science curriculum: A focus-group study. International Journal of Science Education, 23(5), 441–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reid, W. V., Chen, D., Goldfarb, L., Hackmann, H., Lee, Y. T., Mokhele, K., & Whyte, A. (2010, November, 12). Earth system science for global sustainability: Grand challenges. Science, 330, 916–917.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, D. (2007). Scientific literacy/science literacy. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 729–780). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreiner, C., & Sjøberg, S. (2004). ROSE (The relevance of science education). University of Oslo, Research Council of Norway. Science Education, 63(2), 245–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen, C., & Tam, H. P. (2008). The paradoxical relationship between student achievement and self-perception: A cross-national analysis based on three waves of TIMSS data. Educational Research and Evaluation, 14(1), 87–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sjøberg, S., & Schreiner, C. (2005). How do learners in different cultures relate to science and technology? Results and perspectives from the project ROSE (The Relevance of Science Education). Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 6(2), Foreword.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. (2003). UNESCO and the international decade of education for sustainable development (2005–2015). UNESCO International Science, Technology & Environmental Education Newsletter, XXVII(1–2).

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. (2005). International implementation scheme for the UN decade of education for sustainable development. Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, C. (2010, March 19). Science-based health care. Science, 327, 1429.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rodger W. Bybee .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bybee, R.W. (2012). Scientific Literacy in Environmental and Health Education. In: Zeyer, A., Kyburz-Graber, R. (eds) Science | Environment | Health. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3949-1_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics