Abstract
Grand challenges for this age set the stage for this chapter. Because many challenges are directly related to the environment and health, one must ask a question that introduces the theme of scientific literacy—“What is important for citizens to know, value, and be able to do relative to the environment, health, and science-related issues?” The chapter continues with a review of results from the Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2006 science survey. The discussion includes a definition of scientific literacy, presentation of results for students’ attitudes toward selected environmental issues, and students’ interests in selected health issues. The chapter concludes with implications for enhancing scientific literacy using environmental and health contexts.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
An earlier version of the following analysis can be found in McCrae (2009).
- 2.
PISA scales are constructed with a mean of 500 and a standard deviation of 100.
- 3.
Topics are ranked according to how difficult it was for students to express interest in learning about them. Often, however, there was no significant difference in the difficulties of two or three items that have successive ranks.
References
Bloom, B. R. (2010, May 14 ). Support for global health. Editorial. Science, 328, 791.
Bybee, R. (1979a). Science education and the emerging ecological society. Science Education, 63(1), 95–109.
Bybee, R. (1979b). Science education for an ecological society. American Biology Teacher, 41(3), 154–163.
Bybee, R. (1979c). Science education policies for an ecological society: Aims and goals. Science Education, 63(2), 245–255.
Bybee, R. (1991). Planet earth in crisis: How should science educators respond? American Biology Teacher, 53(3), 146–153.
Bybee, R. (1997). Achieving scientific literacy: From purposes to practices. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Bybee, R. (2008). Scientific literacy, environmental issues, and PISA 2006: The 2008 Paul F-Brandwein lecture. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17, 566–585.
Bybee, R. (2010). The teaching of science: 21st century perspectives. Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.
Bybee, R., & Mau, T. (1986). Science and technology related global problems: An international survey of science educators. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 23(7), 599–618.
Bybee, R., & McCrae, B. (2011). Scientific literacy and student attitudes: Perspectives from PISA 2006 science. International Journal of Science Education, 33(1), 7–26.
Bybee, R., McCrae, B., & Laurie, R. (2009). PISA 2006: An assessment of scientific literacy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(8), 865–883.
Bybee, R., Taylor, J., Gardner, A., Van Scotter, P., Powell, J., Westbrook, A., & Landes, N. (2006). The BSCS 5E instructional model: Origins, effectiveness, and applications. Colorado Springs, CO: BSCS.
Coussens, C. (Ed.). (2009). Global environmental health: Research gaps and barriers for providing sustainable water, sanitation, and hygiene services. Workshop Summary. Institute of Medicine of the National Academies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press
DeBoer, G. (1991). A history of ideas in science education: Implications for practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
Duschl, R. A., & Grandy, R. E. (Eds.). (2008). Teaching scientific inquiry. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Fensham, P. (2000). Time to change drivers for scientific literacy. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics, and Technology Education, 2, 9–24.
Fensham, P. (2009). Real world contexts in PISA science: Implications for context-based science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(8), 884–896.
Flick, L. B., & Lederman, N. G. (Eds.). (2004). Scientific inquiry and nature of science. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Goldman, L., & Coussens, C. (Eds.). (2004). Environmental health indicators: Bridging the chasm of public health and the environment. Workshop Summary. Institute of Medicine of the National Academies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Goldstein, B., Fischhoff, B., Marcus, S., & Coussens, C. (Eds.). (2003). Ensuring environmental health in postindustrial cities. Workshop Summary. Institute of Medicine of the National Academies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Holdren, J. (2008, January 25). Science and technology for sustainable well-being. Science, 319, 424–434.
Hurd, P. D. (1958). Science literacy: Its meaning for American schools. Educational Leadership, 16(1), 13–16.
McCarthy, J. (2009, December 18). Reflections on: Our planet and its life, origins, and futures. Science, 236, 1646–1655.
McComas, W. F. (Ed.). (1998). The nature of science in science education. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
McCrae, B. J. (2009). What science do students want to learn? In R. W. Bybee & B. J. McCrae (Eds.), PISA Science 2006: Implications for science teachers and teaching (pp. 149–162). Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association.
Omenn, G. (2006, December 15). Grand challenges and great opportunities in science, technology, and public policy. Science, 314, 1696–1704.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2009). Green at fifteen: How 15-year-olds perform in environmental science and geoscience in PISA 2006. Paris: OECD.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2006). Assessing scientific, reading and mathematical literacy: A framework for PISA 2006. Paris: OECD.
Osborne, J. (2007). Science education for the twenty first century. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 3(3), 173–184.
Osborne, J., & Collins, S. (2001). Pupils’ views of the role and value of the science curriculum: A focus-group study. International Journal of Science Education, 23(5), 441–468.
Reid, W. V., Chen, D., Goldfarb, L., Hackmann, H., Lee, Y. T., Mokhele, K., & Whyte, A. (2010, November, 12). Earth system science for global sustainability: Grand challenges. Science, 330, 916–917.
Roberts, D. (2007). Scientific literacy/science literacy. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 729–780). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Schreiner, C., & Sjøberg, S. (2004). ROSE (The relevance of science education). University of Oslo, Research Council of Norway. Science Education, 63(2), 245–255.
Shen, C., & Tam, H. P. (2008). The paradoxical relationship between student achievement and self-perception: A cross-national analysis based on three waves of TIMSS data. Educational Research and Evaluation, 14(1), 87–100.
Sjøberg, S., & Schreiner, C. (2005). How do learners in different cultures relate to science and technology? Results and perspectives from the project ROSE (The Relevance of Science Education). Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 6(2), Foreword.
UNESCO. (2003). UNESCO and the international decade of education for sustainable development (2005–2015). UNESCO International Science, Technology & Environmental Education Newsletter, XXVII(1–2).
UNESCO. (2005). International implementation scheme for the UN decade of education for sustainable development. Paris: UNESCO.
Zhu, C. (2010, March 19). Science-based health care. Science, 327, 1429.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bybee, R.W. (2012). Scientific Literacy in Environmental and Health Education. In: Zeyer, A., Kyburz-Graber, R. (eds) Science | Environment | Health. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3949-1_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3949-1_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-3948-4
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-3949-1
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)