Research on Human Fallibility and Learning from Errors at Work: Challenges for Theory, Research, and Practice

Chapter
Part of the Professional and Practice-based Learning book series (PPBL, volume 6)

Abstract

This reader comprises articles that demonstrate human fallibility and the necessity to learn from errors in daily work. The book is an attempt to bring together several lines of research in order to sketch the current state of that research on learning from errors in work contexts. The public memory is filled with many examples of catastrophic events in working life (e.g. the accident at Chernobyl, the sinking of the Titanic, the chemical accident in the Sandoz plant in Basel), which all initiated public discussions about the role of human error in their occurrence (Dörner, 1989). However, the issue of learning from errors has gained less public awareness. In the context of quality management systems, enterprises have developed strategies for avoiding errors (Hackman & Wageman, 1995), but reality always corroborates the insight that errors cannot be avoided totally in complex settings (e.g. Vester, 2007). Hence, learning from errors matters for organising daily working life, and, it thus matters for research on professional and workplace learning. The chapters in this book discuss theoretical concepts and empirical analyses of learning from errors in work settings. They enter an intriguing area of educational and psychological research in two respects:

Keywords

Error Case Quality Management System Work Context Workplace Learning Error Orientation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Baldwin, T. T., & Ford, J. K. (1988). Transfer of training: A review and directions for future research. Personnel Psychology, 41, 63–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bauer, J., & Gruber, H. (2007). Workplace changes and workplace learning: Advantages of an educational micro perspective. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 26, 675–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Betsch, T., & Haberstroh, S. (Eds.). (2005). The routines of decision making. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  4. Billett, S. (2001). Learning in the workplace: Strategies for effective practice. Crows Nest, Australia: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  5. Billett, S. (2006). Work, change and workers. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burke, L. A., & Hutchins, H. M. (2007). Training transfer: An integrative literature review. Human Resource Development Review, 6, 263–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chan, Y. E. (2002). Why haven’t we mastered alignment? The importance of the informal organisation structure. MIS Quarterly Executive, 1(2), 97–112.Google Scholar
  8. Chisholm, D. (1992). Coordination without hierarchy: Informal structures in multiorganizational systems. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  9. Cressey, P., Boud, D., & Docherty, P. (2006). The emergence of productive reflection. In D. Boud, P. Cressey, & P. Docherty (Eds.), Productive reflection at work (pp. 11–26). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Dochy, F., Gijbels, D., Segers, M., & van den Bossche, P. (2011). Theories of learning for the workplace. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Dörner, D. (1989). Die Logik des Mißlingens: Strategisches Denken in komplexen Situationen [The logic of failing: Strategic thinking in complex situations]. Reinbek, Germany: Rowohlt.Google Scholar
  12. Ericsson, K. A. (2006). The influence of experience and deliberate practice on the development of superior expert performance. In K. A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. J. Feltovich, & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 683–704). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Ericsson, K. A. (2009). Enhancing the development of professional performance: Implications from the study of deliberate practice. In K. A. Ericsson (Ed.), Development of professional expertise (pp. 405–431). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gartmeier, M., Hetzner, S., Gruber, H., & Heid, H. (2009). Fehlerorientierung und Eigeninitiative im Bankensektor. Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie, 53, 149–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hackman, J. R., & Wageman, R. (1995). Total quality management: Empirical, conceptual, and practical issues. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 309–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Harteis, C., Bauer, J., & Gruber, H. (2008). The culture of learning from mistakes: How employees handle mistakes in everyday work. International Journal of Educational Research, 47, 223–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kirkpatrick, D. L. (2006). Evaluating training programs: The four levels (3rd ed.). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.Google Scholar
  18. Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  19. Kolb, A. Y., & Kolb, D. A. (2005). Learning styles and learning spaces: Enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4, 193–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mezirow, J. (1991). Transformative dimensions of adult learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  21. Mezirow, J. (1997). Transformative theory out of content. Adult Education Quarterly, 46, 60–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Oser, F., Hascher, T., & Spychiger, M. (1999). Lernen aus Fehlern. Zur Psychologie des negativen Wissens [Learning from mistakes. The psychology of negative knowledge]. In W. Althof (Eds.), Fehlerwelten. Vom Fehlermachen und Lernen aus Fehlern (pp. 11–41). Opladen, Germany: Leske + Budrich.Google Scholar
  23. Oser, F., & Spychiger, M. (2005). Lernen ist schmerzhaft. Zur Theorie des negativen Wissens und zur Praxis der Fehlerkultur [Learning is painful. On the theory of negative knowledge and the practice of error culture]. Weinheim, Germany: Beltz.Google Scholar
  24. Reason, J. T. (1990). Human error. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Reber, A. S. (1993). Implicit learning and tacit knowledge. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Sadler-Smith, E. (2010). The intuitive mind. Sussex, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar
  27. Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals thin in action. London: Temple Smith.Google Scholar
  28. Vester, F. (2007). The art of interconnected thinking. Ideas and tools for tackling complexity. München, Germany: MCB.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht  2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christian Harteis
    • 1
  • Johannes Bauer
    • 2
  • Helmut Heid
    • 3
  1. 1.Institute of Educational ScienceUniversity of PaderbornPaderbornGermany
  2. 2.TUM School of EducationTechnische Universität München (TUM)MunichGermany
  3. 3.Institute for Educational ScienceUniversity of RegensburgRegensburgGermany

Personalised recommendations