Chapter Overview
In this chapter I argue that the traditional dichotomy and separation between ‘theory’ – the principles, models and method of the particular discipline – and ‘practice’ – that applies the theories – is problematic. Instead, we take an integrated, holistic approach to the theory and practice of learning, teaching, professional and leadership development and argue for a dialectical relationship between theory and practice and for alternative modes of theorizing and knowledge creation. This argument for a theory/practice dialectic is very topical in times of uncertainty and has been revived in recent literature (Marsh, 2010) with or without reference to classical, seminal works. These seminal works include those of Greek philosophers, the concepts of ‘dialectic’, ‘praxis’, ‘Indigeneity’ (Harris and Wasilewski, 2004), and of the ‘mediating discourse’ (Gustavsen, 2001). The chapter concludes that the art of PALAR requires a synthesis of theory and practice, an integration of knowledge and wisdom, mind and heart, of practical ‘know-how’ and creative dialectic thinking, and of research and development in partnership between research/scholarship and practice/policy development. In this way the discussion in this chapter moves toward connecting the world of theory, research and scholarship with the world of practice.
There is nothing as practical as a good theory.
Kurt Lewin
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming critical: Education, knowledge and action research. London: Falmer Press.
Gustavsen, B. (2001). Theory and practice: The mediating discourse. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research: Participatory action research and inquiry (pp. 18–26). London: Sage.
Habermas, J. (1974). Theory and practice. London: Heinemann.
Harris, L. D., & Wasilewski, J. (2004). Indigeneity, an alternative worldview: Four R’s (relationship, responsibility, reciprocity, redistribution) vs two P’s (power and profit). Sharing the journey towards conscious evolution. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 21, 1–15.
Jansen, J. D. (2009). Knowledge in the blood: Confronting race and the apartheid past. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Kelly, G. A. (1955). The psychology of personal constructs. New York: Norton.
Kemmis, S. (2010). Research for praxis: Knowing doing. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 18(1), 9–27.
Kemmis, S., & Fitzclarence, L. (1986). Beyond reproduction: Metatheory and ideology in curriculum theorising. Geelong, VIC: School of Education, Deakin University.
Kemmis, S., & Smith, T. J. (Eds.). (2008). Enabling praxis: Challenges for education. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Leontiev, A. N. (1977). Tätigkeit, Bewusstsein, Persönlichkeit (action, awareness, personality). Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.
Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science: Selected theoretical papers. New York: Harper and Row.
Marsh, R. (2010). Note from the publisher. The Learning Organisation, 17(1), 117–118.
Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1951). Selected works in two volumes. Moscow: Foreign Languages Publishing House.
Piaget, J. (1977). The role of action in the development of thinking. In W. F. Overton, & J. M. Gallagher (Eds.), Knowledge and development 1: Advances in research and theory. New York: Plenum Press.
Polanyi, M. (1958). Personal knowledge. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (Eds.). (2001). Handbook of action research: Participatory inquiry and practice. London: Sage.
Revans, R. (1991a). Action learning: Reg Revans in Australia. (DVD Series produced by Zuber-Skerritt, O., Video Vision). Brisbane: University of Queensland.
Revans, R. (1991b) The concept, origin and growth of action learning. In O. Zuber-Skerritt (Ed.), Action learning for improved performance (pp. 14–25). Brisbane, QLD: AEBIS Publishing.
Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. London: Temple Smith.
Toulmin, S., & Gustavsen, B. (1996). Beyond theory: Changing organizations through participation, dialogues on work and innovation 2. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Zuber-Skerritt, O. (2011). PALAR: Dialectic of Theory and Practice. In: Action Leadership. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3935-4_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3935-4_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-3934-7
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-3935-4
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)