Assessment and Recognition of Work-Based Learning

Chapter
Part of the Professional and Practice-based Learning book series (PPBL, volume 4)

Abstract

The need to disclose an understanding of how to assess learning is central to education and training. The how and what of these assessments are what I concern myself with here, considering mainly what assessments and their various forms tell us about work-related learning. For example, should there be external examination with set outcomes, often unrevealed to students, or practical achievement made clear to students and their achievement confirmed through choice by the students themselves? This process of unconcealment, of finding the truth with differing levels of certainty, is what this chapter basically addresses. Heidegger’s specific phenomenological method to achieve this is through hermeneutic interpretation. He claims that the “phenomenology of Dasein is a hermeneutic in the primordial signification of this word, where it designates this business of interpreting” (1962, p. 62) and offers two approaches to uncover the covered nature of the phenomena we seek to understand. The first, and the one that will concern us here, is the discovery of practices that have not been investigated prior to this interpretation.

Keywords

Propositional Knowledge External Assessment Practical Achievement Mass High Education Critical Instance 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Allen, V., & Axiotis, A. D. (2002). Heidegger on the art of teaching. In M. Peters (Ed.), An age of uncertainty. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bjørnavold, J. (1997). A question of faith: Methodologies and systems for assessing require a legitimate basis. Vocational Training: European Journal, 12, 68–74.Google Scholar
  3. Collier, K. G. (1988). Higher education and the critique of values. Journal of Moral Education, 17, 21–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Curzon-Hobson, A. (2002). A pedagogy of trust in higher learning. Teaching in Higher Education, 7(3), 256–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Donnelly, J. F. (1999). Schooling Heidegger: On being in teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 15(8), 933–949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dreyfus, H. L. (1992). Being-in-the-world. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  7. Fitzsimons, P. (2002). Enframing education. In M. Peters (Ed.), Heidegger, education and modernity (pp. 171–190). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  8. Foucault, M. (1980). Two lectures. In C. Gordon (Ed.), Power/knowledge: Interviews and other writings, 19721977 (pp. 78–108). New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  9. Gadamer, H.-G. (1996). Reason in the age of science (F. G. Lawrence, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  10. Gibbs, G. (1999). Using assessment strategically to change the way students learn. In S. Brown & A. Glasner (Eds.), Higher education: Choosing and using diverse approaches (pp. 41–53). Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Guskey, T. R. (2007, Spring). Multiple sources of evidence: An analysis of stakeholders’ perceptions of various indicators of student learning. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 26, 19–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Haeringer, A. (2006). The French APEL: Ambitious procedures. In C. Corradi, N. Evans, & A. Valk (Eds.), Recognising experiential learning: Practices in European universities (pp. 83–93). Tartu: Tartu University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Harris, I. (2000, July 3–5). Re-visioning the boundaries of learning theory in the assessment of prior experiential learning (APEL). Unpublished paper presented at the annual conference of the Standing Conference of University Teaching and Research on the Teaching of Adults (SCUTREA), Nottingham, UK.Google Scholar
  14. Heidegger, M. (1962) [1927]. Being and time (J. Macquarrie & E. Robinson, Trans.). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  15. Hussey, T., & Smith, P. (2002). The trouble with learning outcomes. Active Learning in Higher Education, 3(3), 220–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Knowles, M. S. (1980). The modern practice of adult education. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  17. Lueddeke, G. (1997). The accreditation of prior experiential learning in higher education: A discourse on rationales and assumptions. Higher Education Quarterly, 51(3), 210–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Luhmann, N. (1990). Familiarity, confidence, trust: Problems and alternatives. In D. Gambetta (Ed.), Trust: Making and breaking cooperative relations (pp. 94–107). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  19. O’Murchadha, F. (1998, October 1). Future or future past: Temporality between praxis and poiesis. Philosophy Today. Retrieved 24 January, 2010, from http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1P3-35679216.html
  20. Peim, N., & Flint, K. J. (2009) Testing times: Questions concerning assessment for school improvement. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 41(3), 342–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Polanyi, M. (1974). Personal knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  22. Pouget, M., & Osborne, M. (2004). Accreditation or validation of prior experiential learning: Knowledge and savoirs in France—A different perspective. Studies in Continuing Education, 26(1), 45–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Quality Assurance Agency. (2004). Guidelines on the accreditation of prior learning. Retrieved May 21, 2009, from http://www.qaa.ac.uk/academicinfrastructure/apl/ guidance.asp
  24. Ryle, G. (1984). The concept of mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  25. Segal, S. (1999). The existential conditions of explicitness: An Heideggerian perspective. Studies in Continuing Education, 21(1), 73–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Silberman, M. I. (2009). The handbook of experiential learning (essential knowledge resource). New York: Pfeiffer.Google Scholar
  28. Standish, P. (1997). Heidegger and the technology of further education. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 31(3), 430–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Stephenson, J., & Laycock, M. (Eds.). (1993). Using learning contracts in higher education. London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
  30. Trowler, P. (1996). Angels in marble? Accrediting prior experiential learning in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 21(1), 17–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wailey, T. (2002). How to do APEL. London: South England Consortium for Credit Accumulation and Transfer; SEEC.Google Scholar
  32. Winch, C. (2009). Ryle on knowing how and the possibility of vocational education. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 26(10), 88–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wittgenstein, L. (1999). Philosophical investigations (G. E. Ansombe, Trans.). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
  34. Wrathall, M. A. (2000). Background, practices capacities and Heideggerian disclosure. In M. Wrathall & J. Malpas (Eds.), Heidegger, coping and cognitive science (pp. 93–114). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  35. Zimmerman, M. E. (1986). Eclipse of the self. Athens: Ohio University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Middlesex University, The Institute for Work Based LearningNicosiaCyprus

Personalised recommendations