Abstract
CREST focuses on building curricular connections between schools and their communities while integrating technology in a nonhierarchical learning environment. The investigation detailed in this chapter identifies the theoretical frameworks guiding the Communities for Rural Education, Stewardship, and Technology (CREST) professional development model, examines the design principles, and describes how this methodology leads to geospatial technology integration in the science curriculum while providing concrete examples of project implementation using GIS in middle- and high-school science classrooms. The CREST professional development (PD) model consists of a series of dynamic technology trainings, college and career-awareness events, and nonhierarchical team-building activities that occur over a 5-year period. Program evaluation has identified several key factors that lead to higher degrees of success in participating CREST schools implementing local projects including effective sustainable learning community teams and administrative support.
It’s integrating technology completely. It’s building a curriculum on the heritage and strength of our community. It’s an example of how to engage kids in authentic learning. This is the biggest example we have of what education is supposed to look like.
Principal of a CREST school
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baker, T. R., & White, S. H. (2003). The effects of G.I.S. on students’ attitudes, self-efficacy, and achievement in middle school science classrooms. Journal of Geography, 102, 243–254.
Bryant, M., Canniff, J., Casey, M., Christian, S., Cochrane, C., Fontaine, C., et al. (1999). Living and learning in rural schools and communities: A report to the Annenberg rural challenge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Graduate School of Education. ERIC #433608. http://eric.ed.gov. Retrieved May 1, 2007.
Conservation Study Institute website. (2006). Retrieved December 27, 2006, from http://www.nps.gov/csi/engagement/evalCollab.htm
Eggen, P. D., & Kauchak, D. P. (2001). Learning and teaching, research-based methods (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Eisenberg, M., & Johnson, D. (2002). Computer skills for information problem-solving: Learning and teaching technology in context. In: ERIC clearinghouse on information and technology. Syracuse, NY.
Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915–945. Winter 2001.
Groff, J., & Mouza, C. (2008). A framework for addressing challenges to classroom technology use. AACE Journal, 16(1), 21–46.
Hargreaves, A. (1994). Changing teachers, changing times: Teachers’ work and culture in the postmodern age. New York: Teachers College Press.
Holland, I. E., Dede, C., & Onarheim, K. (2006). Processes supporting the regional evolution of effective professional development. In C. DeDe (Ed.), Online professional development for teachers: Emerging models and methods (pp. 213–236). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
Hungerford, H. R., & Volk, T. L. (1990). Changing learner behavior through environmental education. Journal of Environmental Education, 21(3), 8–21.
Kerski, J. (2008). Towards an international geospatial education community. In A. Milson & M. Alibrandi (Eds.), Digital geography: Geospatial technologies in the social studies classroom (pp. 61–74). Charlotte, NC: International Age Publishing, Inc.
McClurg, P. A., & Buss, A. (2007). Professional development: Teachers use of GIS to enhance student learning. Journal of Geography, 106(2), 79–87.
Mitchell, C., & Sackney, L. (2000). Profound improvement: Building capacity for a learning community. Lisse: Swets and Zeitlinger.
National Research Council (NRC). (2006). Learning to think spatially: GIS as a support system in the k-12 curriculum. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Nave, B. (2008). Year three summative evaluation report: Community for rural education, stewardship, and technology (CREST). Unpublished manuscript.
Nave, B. (2009). Year four summative evaluation report: Community for rural education, stewardship, and technology (CREST). Unpublished manuscript.
Orion, N. (2007). A holistic approach for science education for all. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 3(2), 111–118.
Orr, D. (1992). Ecological literacy: Education and the transition to a postmodern world. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
Powers, A. L. (2004). An evaluation of four place-based education programs. The Journal of Environmental Education, 35(4), 17–32.
Senge, P. (2000). Schools that learn. New York: Doubleday.
Shields, P. M., Marsh, J. A., & Adelman, N. E. (1998). Evaluation of NSF’s statewide systemic initiatives (SSI) program: The SSIs’ impacts on classroom practice. Menlo Park, CA: SRI.
Sobel, D. (2004). Place-based education: Connecting classrooms & communities. Great Barrington, MA: The Orion Society.
Weiss, I. R., Montgomery, D. L., Ridgway, C. J., & Bond, S. L. (1998). Local systemic change through teacher enhancement: Year three cross-site report. Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research.
Whitehouse, P., Breit, L., McCloskey, E., Ketelhut, D., & Dede, C. (2006). An overview of current findings from empirical research on online teacher professional development. In C. DeDe (Ed.), Online professional development for teachers: Emerging models and methods (pp. 13–29). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
Young, K. M. (1980). An emerging model in rural America. Community-based education, paper number four. (Report No. ERIC ED 200–382) Office of Education (DHEW), Washington, DC: Teacher Corps.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Conover, S., Kermish-Allen, R., Snyder, R. (2014). Communities for Rural Education, Stewardship, and Technology (CREST): A Rural Model for Teacher Professional Development. In: MaKinster, J., Trautmann, N., Barnett, M. (eds) Teaching Science and Investigating Environmental Issues with Geospatial Technology. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3931-6_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3931-6_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-3930-9
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-3931-6
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)