Skip to main content

Communities for Rural Education, Stewardship, and Technology (CREST): A Rural Model for Teacher Professional Development

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Teaching Science and Investigating Environmental Issues with Geospatial Technology

Abstract

CREST focuses on building curricular connections between schools and their communities while integrating technology in a nonhierarchical learning environment. The investigation detailed in this chapter identifies the theoretical frameworks guiding the Communities for Rural Education, Stewardship, and Technology (CREST) professional development model, examines the design principles, and describes how this methodology leads to geospatial technology integration in the science curriculum while providing concrete examples of project implementation using GIS in middle- and high-school science classrooms. The CREST professional development (PD) model consists of a series of dynamic technology trainings, college and career-awareness events, and nonhierarchical team-building activities that occur over a 5-year period. Program evaluation has identified several key factors that lead to higher degrees of success in participating CREST schools implementing local projects including effective sustainable learning community teams and administrative support.

It’s integrating technology completely. It’s building a curriculum on the heritage and strength of our community. It’s an example of how to engage kids in authentic learning. This is the biggest example we have of what education is supposed to look like.

Principal of a CREST school

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baker, T. R., & White, S. H. (2003). The effects of G.I.S. on students’ attitudes, self-efficacy, and achievement in middle school science classrooms. Journal of Geography, 102, 243–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, M., Canniff, J., Casey, M., Christian, S., Cochrane, C., Fontaine, C., et al. (1999). Living and learning in rural schools and communities: A report to the Annenberg rural challenge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Graduate School of Education. ERIC #433608. http://eric.ed.gov. Retrieved May 1, 2007.

  • Conservation Study Institute website. (2006). Retrieved December 27, 2006, from http://www.nps.gov/csi/engagement/evalCollab.htm

  • Eggen, P. D., & Kauchak, D. P. (2001). Learning and teaching, research-based methods (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, M., & Johnson, D. (2002). Computer skills for information problem-solving: Learning and teaching technology in context. In: ERIC clearinghouse on information and technology. Syracuse, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915–945. Winter 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groff, J., & Mouza, C. (2008). A framework for addressing challenges to classroom technology use. AACE Journal, 16(1), 21–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, A. (1994). Changing teachers, changing times: Teachers’ work and culture in the postmodern age. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, I. E., Dede, C., & Onarheim, K. (2006). Processes supporting the regional evolution of effective professional development. In C. DeDe (Ed.), Online professional development for teachers: Emerging models and methods (pp. 213–236). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hungerford, H. R., & Volk, T. L. (1990). Changing learner behavior through environmental education. Journal of Environmental Education, 21(3), 8–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerski, J. (2008). Towards an international geospatial education community. In A. Milson & M. Alibrandi (Eds.), Digital geography: Geospatial technologies in the social studies classroom (pp. 61–74). Charlotte, NC: International Age Publishing, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClurg, P. A., & Buss, A. (2007). Professional development: Teachers use of GIS to enhance student learning. Journal of Geography, 106(2), 79–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, C., & Sackney, L. (2000). Profound improvement: Building capacity for a learning community. Lisse: Swets and Zeitlinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (NRC). (2006). Learning to think spatially: GIS as a support system in the k-12 curriculum. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nave, B. (2008). Year three summative evaluation report: Community for rural education, stewardship, and technology (CREST). Unpublished manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nave, B. (2009). Year four summative evaluation report: Community for rural education, stewardship, and technology (CREST). Unpublished manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orion, N. (2007). A holistic approach for science education for all. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 3(2), 111–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orr, D. (1992). Ecological literacy: Education and the transition to a postmodern world. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powers, A. L. (2004). An evaluation of four place-based education programs. The Journal of Environmental Education, 35(4), 17–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P. (2000). Schools that learn. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shields, P. M., Marsh, J. A., & Adelman, N. E. (1998). Evaluation of NSF’s statewide systemic initiatives (SSI) program: The SSIs’ impacts on classroom practice. Menlo Park, CA: SRI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobel, D. (2004). Place-based education: Connecting classrooms & communities. Great Barrington, MA: The Orion Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, I. R., Montgomery, D. L., Ridgway, C. J., & Bond, S. L. (1998). Local systemic change through teacher enhancement: Year three cross-site report. Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehouse, P., Breit, L., McCloskey, E., Ketelhut, D., & Dede, C. (2006). An overview of current findings from empirical research on online teacher professional development. In C. DeDe (Ed.), Online professional development for teachers: Emerging models and methods (pp. 13–29). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, K. M. (1980). An emerging model in rural America. Community-based education, paper number four. (Report No. ERIC ED 200–382) Office of Education (DHEW), Washington, DC: Teacher Corps.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shey Conover .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Conover, S., Kermish-Allen, R., Snyder, R. (2014). Communities for Rural Education, Stewardship, and Technology (CREST): A Rural Model for Teacher Professional Development. In: MaKinster, J., Trautmann, N., Barnett, M. (eds) Teaching Science and Investigating Environmental Issues with Geospatial Technology. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3931-6_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics