Advertisement

Communities for Rural Education, Stewardship, and Technology (CREST): A Rural Model for Teacher Professional Development

  • Shey ConoverEmail author
  • Ruth Kermish-Allen
  • Robert Snyder
Chapter

Abstract

CREST focuses on building curricular connections between schools and their communities while integrating technology in a nonhierarchical learning environment. The investigation detailed in this chapter identifies the theoretical frameworks guiding the Communities for Rural Education, Stewardship, and Technology (CREST) professional development model, examines the design principles, and describes how this methodology leads to geospatial technology integration in the science curriculum while providing concrete examples of project implementation using GIS in middle- and high-school science classrooms. The CREST professional development (PD) model consists of a series of dynamic technology trainings, college and career-awareness events, and nonhierarchical team-building activities that occur over a 5-year period. Program evaluation has identified several key factors that lead to higher degrees of success in participating CREST schools implementing local projects including effective sustainable learning community teams and administrative support.

Keywords

Coastal ecology Rural education Sustainable learning communities Place-based education 

References

  1. Baker, T. R., & White, S. H. (2003). The effects of G.I.S. on students’ attitudes, self-efficacy, and achievement in middle school science classrooms. Journal of Geography, 102, 243–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bryant, M., Canniff, J., Casey, M., Christian, S., Cochrane, C., Fontaine, C., et al. (1999). Living and learning in rural schools and communities: A report to the Annenberg rural challenge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Graduate School of Education. ERIC #433608. http://eric.ed.gov. Retrieved May 1, 2007.
  3. Conservation Study Institute website. (2006). Retrieved December 27, 2006, from http://www.nps.gov/csi/engagement/evalCollab.htm
  4. Eggen, P. D., & Kauchak, D. P. (2001). Learning and teaching, research-based methods (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  5. Eisenberg, M., & Johnson, D. (2002). Computer skills for information problem-solving: Learning and teaching technology in context. In: ERIC clearinghouse on information and technology. Syracuse, NY.Google Scholar
  6. Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915–945. Winter 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Groff, J., & Mouza, C. (2008). A framework for addressing challenges to classroom technology use. AACE Journal, 16(1), 21–46.Google Scholar
  8. Hargreaves, A. (1994). Changing teachers, changing times: Teachers’ work and culture in the postmodern age. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  9. Holland, I. E., Dede, C., & Onarheim, K. (2006). Processes supporting the regional evolution of effective professional development. In C. DeDe (Ed.), Online professional development for teachers: Emerging models and methods (pp. 213–236). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.Google Scholar
  10. Hungerford, H. R., & Volk, T. L. (1990). Changing learner behavior through environmental education. Journal of Environmental Education, 21(3), 8–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kerski, J. (2008). Towards an international geospatial education community. In A. Milson & M. Alibrandi (Eds.), Digital geography: Geospatial technologies in the social studies classroom (pp. 61–74). Charlotte, NC: International Age Publishing, Inc.Google Scholar
  12. McClurg, P. A., & Buss, A. (2007). Professional development: Teachers use of GIS to enhance student learning. Journal of Geography, 106(2), 79–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mitchell, C., & Sackney, L. (2000). Profound improvement: Building capacity for a learning community. Lisse: Swets and Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
  14. National Research Council (NRC). (2006). Learning to think spatially: GIS as a support system in the k-12 curriculum. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  15. Nave, B. (2008). Year three summative evaluation report: Community for rural education, stewardship, and technology (CREST). Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  16. Nave, B. (2009). Year four summative evaluation report: Community for rural education, stewardship, and technology (CREST). Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  17. Orion, N. (2007). A holistic approach for science education for all. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 3(2), 111–118.Google Scholar
  18. Orr, D. (1992). Ecological literacy: Education and the transition to a postmodern world. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  19. Powers, A. L. (2004). An evaluation of four place-based education programs. The Journal of Environmental Education, 35(4), 17–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Senge, P. (2000). Schools that learn. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  21. Shields, P. M., Marsh, J. A., & Adelman, N. E. (1998). Evaluation of NSF’s statewide systemic initiatives (SSI) program: The SSIs’ impacts on classroom practice. Menlo Park, CA: SRI.Google Scholar
  22. Sobel, D. (2004). Place-based education: Connecting classrooms & communities. Great Barrington, MA: The Orion Society.Google Scholar
  23. Weiss, I. R., Montgomery, D. L., Ridgway, C. J., & Bond, S. L. (1998). Local systemic change through teacher enhancement: Year three cross-site report. Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research.Google Scholar
  24. Whitehouse, P., Breit, L., McCloskey, E., Ketelhut, D., & Dede, C. (2006). An overview of current findings from empirical research on online teacher professional development. In C. DeDe (Ed.), Online professional development for teachers: Emerging models and methods (pp. 13–29). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.Google Scholar
  25. Young, K. M. (1980). An emerging model in rural America. Community-based education, paper number four. (Report No. ERIC ED 200–382) Office of Education (DHEW), Washington, DC: Teacher Corps.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shey Conover
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ruth Kermish-Allen
    • 1
  • Robert Snyder
    • 1
  1. 1.Island InstituteRocklandUSA

Personalised recommendations