Advertisement

Meeting Teachers Where They Are and Helping Them Achieve Their Geospatial Goals

  • Nancy TrautmannEmail author
  • James MaKinster
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter presents the flexibly adaptive model of teacher professional development, which was developed in the GIT Ahead project to enable secondary science teachers to incorporate a variety of geospatial applications into wide-ranging classroom contexts. Impacts on participating teachers were evaluated using project application materials, curricular resources developed and implemented by each teacher, written reflections, and questionnaires. Pre-post questionnaire responses showed significant growth in teachers’ perceived expertise, interest, and self-confidence with regard to integrating geospatial analyses into their science teaching. When viewed from the perspective of the Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) framework, teachers grew in Technological Content Knowledge and in the extent to which this knowledge intersected with their pedagogical and science content knowledge as they learned new ways to apply geospatial technology in their teaching. Key aspects of professional development for the support of teaching science with geospatial technology included intensive summer training, ongoing technological and curricular support throughout the school year, promotion of a supportive learning community, and flexibility in expectations regarding the nature and focus of classroom implementation. Research is needed to create validated instruments for measuring teacher self-efficacy for teaching with geospatial technology and for measuring associated student learning outcomes.

Keywords

Technological pedagogical content knowledge Learning community Flexibility Self-confidence 

Notes

Acknowledgments 

This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) under DUE Grant No 0602751. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of NSF.

References

  1. Barab, S. A., & Luehmann, A. L. (2003). Building sustainable science curriculum: Acknowledging and accommodating local adaptation. Science Education, 87(4), 454–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(2), 141–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Coulter, B., & Polman, J. L. (2004). Enacting technology-supported inquiry learning through mapping our environment. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
  4. Loucks, S. F. (1983). Ensuring success: Good news from a study of school improvement. Educational Leadership, 41, 3–32.Google Scholar
  5. Malone, L., Palmer, A. M., Voigt, C. L., Napoleon, E., & Feaster, L. (2005). Mapping our world: GIS lessons for educators, ArcGIS desktop edition. Redlands, CA: ESRI Press.Google Scholar
  6. McClurg, P. A., & Buss, A. (2007). Professional development: Teachers use of GIS to enhance student learning. Journal of Geography, 106, 79–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A new framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Morgan, C., MaKinster, J., & Trautmann, N. M. (2009). Learning secondary science using geospatial technology: Understanding student experiences and perceptions. Paper presented at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching. Garden Grove, CA.Google Scholar
  9. Penuel, W. R., & Means, B. (2004). Implementation variation and fidelity in an inquiry science program: An analysis of GLOBE data reporting patterns. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(3), 294–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Squire, K. D., MaKinster, J. G., Barnett, M., Leuhmann, A. L., & Barab, S. L. (2003). Designed curriculum and local culture: Acknowledging the primacy of classroom culture. Science Education, 87(4), 468–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Trautmann, N. M., & MaKinster, J. G. (2010). Flexibly adaptive professional development for teaching science with geospatial technology. Journal of Science Teacher Education, Pre-Published Online. doi: 10.1007/s10972-009-9181-4.Google Scholar
  12. Wilson, C., & MaKinster, J. (2008). Hog wild. Geneva, NY: GIT Ahead Project.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Cornell Lab of OrnithologyCornell UniversityIthacaUSA
  2. 2.Education DepartmentHobart and William Smith CollegesGenevaUSA

Personalised recommendations