Advertisement

The Nature of Teacher Knowledge Necessary for the Effective Use of Geospatial Technologies to Teach Science

  • James MaKinsterEmail author
  • Nancy Trautmann
Chapter

Abstract

Section II provides insights into the design and implementation of professional development and curricular resources for teaching science with geospatial technology. This final chapter synthesizes what has been learned about the knowledge needed for teachers to successfully implement geospatial inquiry. Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) serves as a theoretical model that reveals the interrelationships between the types of knowledge and specific pedagogical approaches that teachers use when teaching science with geospatial technology. Examples from the projects profiled in this volume are used to illustrate and define the knowledge domains of Technological Content Knowledge, Technological Pedagogical Knowledge, and TPACK. Ultimately, this chapter provides a framework for understanding teacher knowledge that project designers and researchers can use when designing and studying professional development experiences and related curricular materials.

Keywords

Design Experiments Environmental Framework Geographic Information Systems (GIS) Google Earth Professional Development Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) 

References

  1. Barab, S. A., Squire, K., & Dueber, B. (2000). Supporting authenticity through participatory learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(2), 37–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barnett, M., MaKinster, J., Trautmann, N., Vaughn, M. H., & Mark, S. (2013). Geospatial technologies: The present and future roles of emerging technologies in environmental education. In B. Stevenson, M. Brody, J. Dillon, & A. E. J. Wals (Eds.), International handbook of research on environmental education. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Beckett, K. L., & Shaffer, D. W. (2005). Augmented by reality: The pedagogical praxis of urban planning as a parthway to ecological thinking. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 33(1), 31–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Borthwick, A., Charles, M., Pierson, M., Thompson, A., Park, J., Searson, M., et al. (2008). Realizing technology potential through TPACK. Learning and Leading with Technology. September/October 2008. 36(2), 23–26.Google Scholar
  5. Cobb, P. (1994). Where is the mind? Constructivist and sociocultural perspectives on mathematical development. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 13–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cox, S. (2008). A conceptual analysis of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Provo, UT: Brigham Young University.Google Scholar
  7. Edelson, D. C., Schwille, K., Bruozas, M., Lach, M., Taber, M., Gordin, D. N., et al. (2005). Investigations in environmental science: A case-based approach to the study of environmental systems. Armonk: It’s About Time.Google Scholar
  8. Gess-Newsome, J., & Lederman, N. G. (1999). Examining pedagogical content knowledge. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  9. Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2008). Introducing TPCK. In: AACTE Committee on Innovation and Technology (Ed.), The handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK) for educators (pp. 3–29). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  10. Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1). Retrieved May 5, 2009, from http://www.citejournal.org/vol9/iss1/general/article1.cfm
  11. Loughran, J., Berry, A., & Mulhall, P. (2007). Pedagogical content knowledge: What does it mean to science teachers? In R. Pinto & D. Couso (Eds.), Contributions from science education research (pp. 93–105). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Loughran, J., Milroy, P., Berry, A., Gunstone, R., & Mulhall, P. (2001). Documenting science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge through PaP-eRs. Research in Science Education, 31(2), 289–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Maguire, D. J. (1991). An overview and definition of GIS. In J. Maguire, M. F. Goodchild, & D. W. Rhind (Eds.), Geographical information systems (pp. 9–20). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  14. McPherson, E. G., Nowak, D., Heisler, G., Grimmond, S., Souch, C., Grant, R., et al. (1997). Quantifying urban forest structure, function, and value: The Chicago urabn forest climate project. Urban Ecosystems, 1, 49–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A new framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  17. Palfrey, J., & Gasser, U. (2010). Born digital: Understanding the first generation of digital natives. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  18. Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(1), 4–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22.Google Scholar
  20. van Driel, J. H., Verloop, N., & de Vos, W. (1998). Developing science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 673–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Veal, W. R., & MaKinster, J. G. (1999). Pedagogical content knowledge taxonomies. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 3(4). Retrieved December 27, 2010, from http://unr.edu/homepage/crowther/ejse/vealmak.html
  22. Veal, W. R., van Driel, J., & Hulshof, H. (2001). PCK: How teachers transform subject matter knowledge. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 4(3), 285–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Voogt, J., Fisser, P., Pareja Roblin, N., Tondeur, J., & van Braak, J. (2013). Technological pedagogical content knowledge – A review of the literature. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(2), 109–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Hobart and William Smith CollegesGenevaUSA
  2. 2.Cornell Lab of OrnithologyIthacaUSA

Personalised recommendations