Abstract
Bohr’s often quoted phrase “reduce experience to order” highlights that studying science is about collecting data through experiences, inferring patterns or relationships in those experiences, and then developing explanations that provide understanding into why certain patterns emerge and others do not. Geospatial technologies offer educators powerful learning resources to engage students in this scientific process. For 3 years, we have been using a range of geospatial technologies including online applications such as Google Earth to powerful desktop applications such as geographic information systems (GIS) to assist teachers who are introducing their students to the rapidly emerging field of urban ecology. Geospatial technologies along with computational modeling tools have proven to be a powerful way to support teachers and students as they critically examine their own neighborhoods.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Akerson, V. L., & Dickinson, L. E. (2003). Using GIS technology to support K-8 scientific inquiry teaching and learning. Science Educator, 12(1), 41–47.
Alberti, M. (2008). Advances in urban ecology: Integrating humans and ecological processes in urban ecosystems. New York: Springer.
Alibrandi, M. (2003). GIS in the classroom: Using geographic information systems in social studies and environmental science. [with CD-ROM]. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Baker, T. R., & White, S. H. (2003). The effects of GIS on students’ attitudes, self-efficacy, and achievement in middle school science classrooms. Journal of Geography, 102(6), 243–254.
Barab, S. A., Hay, K. E., Barnett, M., & Keating, T. (2000). Virtual solar system project: Building understanding through model building. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(7), 719–756.
Barnett, M., Houle, M., & Strauss, E. (2008). Using geographic information systems to support student learning through urban ecology. Paper presented at the International Conference of the Learning Sciences, Utrecht, NL.
Beckett, K. L., & Shaffer, D. W. (2005). Augmented by reality: The pedagogical praxis of urban planning as a pathway to ecological thinking. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 33(1), 31–52.
Berkowitz, A., Nilon, C., & Hollweg, K. (Eds.). (2003). Understanding urban ecosystems: A new frontier for science and education. New York: Springer.
Bodzin, A. M. (2008). Integrating instructional technologies in a local watershed investigation with urban elementary learners. Journal of Environmental Education, 39(2), 47–57.
Carlson, T. (2007). A field-based learning experience for introductory level GIS students. Journal of Geography, 106(5), 193–198.
Carter, G. R. (1997). Service learning in curriculum reform. In J. Schine (Ed.), Service learning (pp. 69–78). Chicago: The National Society for the Study of Education.
Charif, R. A., Clark, C. W., & Fristrup, K. M. (2003). Raven 1.1 user’s manual. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Laboratory of Ornithology.
Davis, E. A., & Krajcik, J. S. (2005). Designing educative curriculum materials to promote teacher learning. Educational Researcher, 34(3), 3–14.
DeMers, M. N., & Vincent, J. S. (2007). ArcAtlas in the classroom: Pattern identification, description, and explanation. Journal of Geography, 106(6), 277–284.
Doering, A., & Veletsianos, G. (2007). An investigation of the use of real-time, authentic geospatial data in the K-12 classroom. Journal of Geography, 106(6), 217–225.
Edelson, D., Smith, D. A., & Brown, M. (2008). Beyond interactive mapping: Bringing data analysis with GIS into the social studies classroom. In A. J. Milson & M. Alibrandi (Eds.), Digital geography: Geo-spatial technologies in the social studies classroom. Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
Environmental Literacy Council. (2004). http://www.enviroliteracy.org/article.php/1126.html. Retrieved February 22, 2006, from http://www.enviroliteracy.org/article.php/1126.html
Grimm, N. B., Grove, J. M., Pickett, S. T., & Redman, C. L. (2000). Integrated approaches to long-term studies of urban ecological systems. BioScience, 50(7), 571–584.
Hollweg, K., Pea, C. H., & Berkowitz, A. R. (2003). Why is understanding urban ecosystem an important frontier for education and educators? In A. R. Berkowitz, C. H. Nilon, & K. Hollweg (Eds.), Understanding urban ecosystems: A new frontier for science and education (pp. 19–38). New York: Springer.
Houle, M. (2007). Investigating the role of educative curriculum materials in supporting teacher enactment and student learning in a field-based urban ecology inquiry project. Chestnut Hill: Boston College.
Kahle, J. B., Meece, J., & Scantlebury, K. (2000). Urban African-American middle school science students: Does standards-based teaching make a difference. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(9), 1019–1041.
Kerski, J. J. (2007). The implementation and effectiveness of geographic information systems technology and methods in secondary education. Retrieved August 1, 2010, from http://gis.esri.com/library/userconf/proc01/professional/papers/pap191/p191.htm
Maguire, D. J. (1991). An overview and definition of GIS. In J. Maguire, M. F. Goodchild, & D. W. Rhind (Eds.), Geographical information systems (pp. 9–20). New York: Wiley.
Manzanal, R. F., Barreiro, L. M. R., & Jimenez, M. C. (1999). Relationship between ecology fieldwork and student attitudes toward environmental protection. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(4), 431–453.
Marzluf, J. (2008). Urban ecology: An international perspective on the interaction between humans and nature. New York: Springer.
McClurg, P. A., & Buss, A. (2007). Professional development: Teachers use of GIS to enhance student learning. Journal of Geography, 106(2), 79–87.
McPherson, E. G., Nowak, D., Heisler, G., Grimmond, S., Souch, C., Grant, R., et al. (1997). Quantifying urban forest structure, function, and value: The Chicago urban forest climate project. Urban Ecosystems, 1, 49–61.
National Research Council. (2006). Learning to think spatially: GIS as a support system in the K-12 curriculum. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Resnick, L. (1987). Education and learning to think. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Savery, J., & Duffy, T. (1996). Problem based learning. An instructional model and its constructionist framework. In B. Wilson (Ed.), Constructivist learning environments: Case studies in instructional design (pp. 135–148). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
Shaffer, D. (2004). Pedagogical praxis: The professions as models for post-industrial education. Teachers College Record, 106(7), 1401–1421.
Shochat, E., Warren, P. S., Faeth, S. H., McIntyre, N. E., & Hope, D. (2006). From patterns to emerging processes in mechanistic urban ecology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 21, 186–191.
Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22.
Slabbekoorn, H., & Peet, M. (2003). Birds sing at a higher pitch in urban noise. Nature, 424, 267.
Stubbs, H. S., Fowler, K., Ball, J., Singh, N., Whitaker, D., & Hawley, B. (2007). Educational environmental projects, using technology applications, for middle school students in formal and non-formal settings. Meridian: A middle school computer technologies journal. Retrieved from http://www.ncsu.edu/meridian/sum2003/gis/3.html
Warren, P. S., Katti, M., Ermann, M., & Brazel, A. (2006). Urban bioacoustics: It’s not just noise. Animal Behavior, 71(3), 491–502.
Wood, W. E., & Yezerinac, S. M. (2006). Song sparrow (Melospiza melodia) song varies with urban noise. The Auk, 123(3), 650–659.
Acknowledgments
This work is supported in part through a National Science Foundation Innovative Technology Experiences for Students and Teachers (ITEST) program (Grant # 0525040) and a Hewlett Packard Foundation – Technology and Teaching Foundation (Grant# 189660).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Barnett, M. et al. (2014). Participatory Professional Development: Geospatially Enhanced Urban Ecological Field Studies. In: MaKinster, J., Trautmann, N., Barnett, M. (eds) Teaching Science and Investigating Environmental Issues with Geospatial Technology. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3931-6_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3931-6_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-3930-9
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-3931-6
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)