Advertisement

Participatory Professional Development: Geospatially Enhanced Urban Ecological Field Studies

  • Michael BarnettEmail author
  • Meredith Houle
  • Sheron L. Mark
  • Daphne Minner
  • Linda Hirsch
  • Eric Strauss
  • Eric Strauss
  • Lindsey Cotter-Hayes
  • Beth Hufnagel
Chapter

Abstract

Bohr’s often quoted phrase “reduce experience to order” highlights that studying science is about collecting data through experiences, inferring patterns or relationships in those experiences, and then developing explanations that provide understanding into why certain patterns emerge and others do not. Geospatial technologies offer educators powerful learning resources to engage students in this scientific process. For 3 years, we have been using a range of geospatial technologies including online applications such as Google Earth to powerful desktop applications such as geographic information systems (GIS) to assist teachers who are introducing their students to the rapidly emerging field of urban ecology. Geospatial technologies along with computational modeling tools have proven to be a powerful way to support teachers and students as they critically examine their own neighborhoods.

Keywords

Field Studies Urban Education Urban Ecology 

Notes

Acknowledgments 

This work is supported in part through a National Science Foundation Innovative Technology Experiences for Students and Teachers (ITEST) program (Grant # 0525040) and a Hewlett Packard Foundation – Technology and Teaching Foundation (Grant# 189660).

References

  1. Akerson, V. L., & Dickinson, L. E. (2003). Using GIS technology to support K-8 scientific inquiry teaching and learning. Science Educator, 12(1), 41–47.Google Scholar
  2. Alberti, M. (2008). Advances in urban ecology: Integrating humans and ecological processes in urban ecosystems. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alibrandi, M. (2003). GIS in the classroom: Using geographic information systems in social studies and environmental science. [with CD-ROM]. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  4. Baker, T. R., & White, S. H. (2003). The effects of GIS on students’ attitudes, self-efficacy, and achievement in middle school science classrooms. Journal of Geography, 102(6), 243–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barab, S. A., Hay, K. E., Barnett, M., & Keating, T. (2000). Virtual solar system project: Building understanding through model building. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(7), 719–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barnett, M., Houle, M., & Strauss, E. (2008). Using geographic information systems to support student learning through urban ecology. Paper presented at the International Conference of the Learning Sciences, Utrecht, NL.Google Scholar
  7. Beckett, K. L., & Shaffer, D. W. (2005). Augmented by reality: The pedagogical praxis of urban planning as a pathway to ecological thinking. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 33(1), 31–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Berkowitz, A., Nilon, C., & Hollweg, K. (Eds.). (2003). Understanding urban ecosystems: A new frontier for science and education. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  9. Bodzin, A. M. (2008). Integrating instructional technologies in a local watershed investigation with urban elementary learners. Journal of Environmental Education, 39(2), 47–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carlson, T. (2007). A field-based learning experience for introductory level GIS students. Journal of Geography, 106(5), 193–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carter, G. R. (1997). Service learning in curriculum reform. In J. Schine (Ed.), Service learning (pp. 69–78). Chicago: The National Society for the Study of Education.Google Scholar
  12. Charif, R. A., Clark, C. W., & Fristrup, K. M. (2003). Raven 1.1 user’s manual. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Laboratory of Ornithology.Google Scholar
  13. Davis, E. A., & Krajcik, J. S. (2005). Designing educative curriculum materials to promote teacher learning. Educational Researcher, 34(3), 3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. DeMers, M. N., & Vincent, J. S. (2007). ArcAtlas in the classroom: Pattern identification, description, and explanation. Journal of Geography, 106(6), 277–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Doering, A., & Veletsianos, G. (2007). An investigation of the use of real-time, authentic geospatial data in the K-12 classroom. Journal of Geography, 106(6), 217–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Edelson, D., Smith, D. A., & Brown, M. (2008). Beyond interactive mapping: Bringing data analysis with GIS into the social studies classroom. In A. J. Milson & M. Alibrandi (Eds.), Digital geography: Geo-spatial technologies in the social studies classroom. Greenwich, CT: Information Age.Google Scholar
  17. Environmental Literacy Council. (2004). http://www.enviroliteracy.org/article.php/1126.html. Retrieved February 22, 2006, from http://www.enviroliteracy.org/article.php/1126.html
  18. Grimm, N. B., Grove, J. M., Pickett, S. T., & Redman, C. L. (2000). Integrated approaches to long-term studies of urban ecological systems. BioScience, 50(7), 571–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hollweg, K., Pea, C. H., & Berkowitz, A. R. (2003). Why is understanding urban ecosystem an important frontier for education and educators? In A. R. Berkowitz, C. H. Nilon, & K. Hollweg (Eds.), Understanding urban ecosystems: A new frontier for science and education (pp. 19–38). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Houle, M. (2007). Investigating the role of educative curriculum materials in supporting teacher enactment and student learning in a field-based urban ecology inquiry project. Chestnut Hill: Boston College.Google Scholar
  21. Kahle, J. B., Meece, J., & Scantlebury, K. (2000). Urban African-American middle school science students: Does standards-based teaching make a difference. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(9), 1019–1041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kerski, J. J. (2007). The implementation and effectiveness of geographic information systems technology and methods in secondary education. Retrieved August 1, 2010, from http://gis.esri.com/library/userconf/proc01/professional/papers/pap191/p191.htm
  23. Maguire, D. J. (1991). An overview and definition of GIS. In J. Maguire, M. F. Goodchild, & D. W. Rhind (Eds.), Geographical information systems (pp. 9–20). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  24. Manzanal, R. F., Barreiro, L. M. R., & Jimenez, M. C. (1999). Relationship between ecology fieldwork and student attitudes toward environmental protection. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(4), 431–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Marzluf, J. (2008). Urban ecology: An international perspective on the interaction between humans and nature. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  26. McClurg, P. A., & Buss, A. (2007). Professional development: Teachers use of GIS to enhance student learning. Journal of Geography, 106(2), 79–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. McPherson, E. G., Nowak, D., Heisler, G., Grimmond, S., Souch, C., Grant, R., et al. (1997). Quantifying urban forest structure, function, and value: The Chicago urban forest climate project. Urban Ecosystems, 1, 49–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. National Research Council. (2006). Learning to think spatially: GIS as a support system in the K-12 curriculum. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  29. Resnick, L. (1987). Education and learning to think. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  30. Savery, J., & Duffy, T. (1996). Problem based learning. An instructional model and its constructionist framework. In B. Wilson (Ed.), Constructivist learning environments: Case studies in instructional design (pp. 135–148). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.Google Scholar
  31. Shaffer, D. (2004). Pedagogical praxis: The professions as models for post-industrial education. Teachers College Record, 106(7), 1401–1421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Shochat, E., Warren, P. S., Faeth, S. H., McIntyre, N. E., & Hope, D. (2006). From patterns to emerging processes in mechanistic urban ecology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 21, 186–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22.Google Scholar
  34. Slabbekoorn, H., & Peet, M. (2003). Birds sing at a higher pitch in urban noise. Nature, 424, 267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Stubbs, H. S., Fowler, K., Ball, J., Singh, N., Whitaker, D., & Hawley, B. (2007). Educational environmental projects, using technology applications, for middle school students in formal and non-formal settings. Meridian: A middle school computer technologies journal. Retrieved from http://www.ncsu.edu/meridian/sum2003/gis/3.html
  36. Warren, P. S., Katti, M., Ermann, M., & Brazel, A. (2006). Urban bioacoustics: It’s not just noise. Animal Behavior, 71(3), 491–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wood, W. E., & Yezerinac, S. M. (2006). Song sparrow (Melospiza melodia) song varies with urban noise. The Auk, 123(3), 650–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Barnett
    • 1
    Email author
  • Meredith Houle
    • 2
  • Sheron L. Mark
    • 3
  • Daphne Minner
    • 4
  • Linda Hirsch
    • 5
  • Eric Strauss
    • 6
  • Eric Strauss
    • 7
  • Lindsey Cotter-Hayes
    • 8
  • Beth Hufnagel
    • 9
  1. 1.Lynch School of Education, Boston CollegeChestnut HillUSA
  2. 2.School of Teacher EducationSan Diego State UniversitySan DiegoUSA
  3. 3.STEM Education Post-Doctoral Fellow, Center for Urban Resilience (CURes)Loyola Marymount UniversityLos AngelesUSA
  4. 4.Director of Public ProgramsThe Arnold Arboretum of Harvard UniversityJamaica PlainUSA
  5. 5.Learning and Teaching DivisionEducational Development CenterWalthamUSA
  6. 6.Urban EcologyLos AngelesUSA
  7. 7.The Center for Urban ResilienceLoyola Marymount UniversityLos AngelesUSA
  8. 8.Groundwork LawrenceLawrenceUSA
  9. 9.The Pennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations