Advertisement

Impact of Science Teacher Professional Development Through Geospatial Technologies: A 5-Step Program of Support

  • Rita A. HagevikEmail author
  • Harriett S. Stubbs Emeritus
  • Christiane Gioppo
  • Diane C. Whitaker
Chapter

Abstract

This study addressed the effectiveness of using geospatial technologies (GT) to provide authentic experiences for teachers and their students in environmental science. The 5-Step GT program is cumulative. Each step increases in complexity, leading participants from basic computer skills and environmental science content to conducting community-based projects. Through a problem-based approach, teachers build upon their own understanding and share knowledge with their students. Continuous support, scientist collaboration, geospatial technology community support, and direct pedagogical instruction proved to be essential components of the program. The program offered flexibility, as participants could repeat each of the five steps as many times as needed. In addition, teachers could become teacher leaders at any level of the 5-Step GT program. Our research showed that approaching teacher professional development from a personal development perspective resulted in teacher expertise and confidence in using geospatial technologies in the teachers’ classrooms.

Keywords

Environmental education In-service teachers Professional development Geospatial technology Geographic information systems Global positioning systems Google earth Teacher leaders 

References

  1. Alibrandi, M. (1998). GIS as a tool in interdisciplinary environmental studies: Student, teacher, and community perspectives. Meridian, 1(2), 1–10.Google Scholar
  2. American Forests. (2000). CITYgreen (Version 4.0). Washington, DC: American Forests.Google Scholar
  3. Audet, R. H., & Abegg, G. L. (1996). Geographic information systems: Implications for problem solving. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(1), 121–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baker, T. R. (2002). The effects of geographic information system (GIS) technologies on students’ attitudes, self-efficacy, and achievement in middle school science classrooms. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Kansas, Lawrence.Google Scholar
  5. Borko, H., & Putnam, R. T. (1995). Expanding a teachers’ knowledge base: A cognitive psychological perspective on professional development. In T. R. Guskey & M. Huberman (Eds.), Professional development in education: New paradigms and practices (pp. 35–65). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  6. Constible, J. M., McWilliams, R. G., Soldo, E. G., Perry, B. E., & Lee, R. E. (2007). An immersion professional development program in environmental science for Inservice Elementary School Teachers. Journal of Geoscience Education, 55(1), 72–79.Google Scholar
  7. Coulter, B. (2003). Mapping neighborhood trees to enhance math and science skills. Paper presented at the National Urban Forest Conference, San Antonio, TX.Google Scholar
  8. Coulter, B., & Polman, J. L. (2004). Enacting technology-supported inquiry learning through mapping our environment. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CAGoogle Scholar
  9. Drath, W., Palus, C. J., & McGuire, J. B. (2010). Developing an interdependent leadership culture. In C. D. McCauley, E. Van Velsor, & M. N. Ruderman (Eds.), The center for creative leadership handbook of leadership development (3rd ed., pp. 405–428). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  10. Desimone, L. (2002). How can comprehensive school reform models be successfully implemented? Review of Educational Research, 72(1), 433–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Desimone, L., Porter, A. C., Garet, M. S., Yoon, K. S., & Birman, B. F. (2002). Effects of professional development on teachers’ instruction: Results from a three-year longitudinal study. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(2), 81–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Edelson, D. C., Gordin, D. N., & Pea, R. D. (1999). Addressing the challenges of inquiry-based learning through technology and curriculum design. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8(3/4), 391–450.Google Scholar
  13. Edelson, D. C., & Moeller, B. (2004). Designing GIS software for education: A workshop report for the GIS community. Chicago: GEODE Initiative, Northwestern University.Google Scholar
  14. Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915–945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gioppo, C., & Barra, V. M. (2005). Primary school evaluation. Curitiba: UFPR/SEB-MEC.Google Scholar
  16. Gioppo, C., da Silva, R. V., & Barra, V. M. (2006). Middle school science evaluation. Curitiba: UFPR/SEB-MEC.Google Scholar
  17. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.Google Scholar
  18. Hagevik, R. (1999). Mapping Our School Site (MOSS). 2003, from www.ncsu.edu/scilink/studysite
  19. Hagevik, R. (2008). Facilitating scientific inquiry using CITYgreen and the problem-study framework. Meridian Middle Schools Computer Technologies Journal, 11(1), 1–16.Google Scholar
  20. Horton, J., Hagevik, R., Adkinson, B., & Parmly, J. (2013). Get connected: Incorporating technology into your lessons does not mean you have to stay indoors! Science and Children, 50(7), 44–49.Google Scholar
  21. Howe, A. C., & Stubbs, H. S. (1998). Empowering science teachers: A model for professional development. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 8(3), 167–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Howe, A. C., & Stubbs, H. S. (2003). From science teacher to teacher leader: Leadership development as meaning making in a community of practice. Science Teacher Education, 8(3), 167–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kegan, R. (1994). In over our heads. The mental demands of modern life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Kerski, J. J. (2003). The implementation and effectiveness of geographic information systems technology and methods in secondary education. Journal of Geography, 102(3), 128–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Loucks-Horsley, S., Hewson, P. W., Love, N., & Stiles, K. E. (1998). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.Google Scholar
  26. McWillimas, H., & Rooney, P. (1997). Mapping our city: Learning to use spatial data in the middle school science classroom. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
  27. National Research Council. (2006). Learning to think spatially. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  28. Palus, C., & Drath, W. (1995). Evolving leaders: A model for promoting leadership development in programs. Greensboro, NC: Center for Creative Leadership.Google Scholar
  29. Penuel, W. R., Fishman, B. J., Yamaguchi, R., & Gallagher, L. P. (2007). What makes professional development effective? Strategies that foster curriculum implementation. American Educational Research Journal, 44(4), 921–958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Reys, B. J., Reys, R. E., Barnes, D., Beem, J., & Papik, I. (1997). Collaborative curriculum investigations as a vehicle for teacher enhancement and mathematics curriculum reform. School Science and Mathematics, 97, 422–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Showers, B., Joyce, B., & Benett, B. (1987). Synthesis of research on staff development: A framework for future study and state-of-the-art analysis. Educational Leadership, 45(3), 77–87.Google Scholar
  32. Stubbs, H. (2003). Educational environmental projects, using technology applications, for middle school students in formal and non-formal settings. Meridian Middle Schools Technologies Journal, 6(2) 1–26.Google Scholar
  33. Stubbs, H. S. (2010). SCI-LINK. 2010, from www.ncsu.edu/scilink
  34. Supovitz, J. A., & Turner, H. M. (2000). The effects of professional development on science teaching practices and classroom culture. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(2), 963–980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rita A. Hagevik
    • 1
    Email author
  • Harriett S. Stubbs Emeritus
    • 2
  • Christiane Gioppo
    • 3
  • Diane C. Whitaker
    • 4
  1. 1.Department BiologyThe University of North Carolina at PembrokePembrokeUSA
  2. 2.Department of Mathematics, Science, and Technology EducationNorth Carolina State UniversityRaleighUSA
  3. 3.Department of Theory and Teaching InternshipFederal University of ParanáCuritibaBrazil
  4. 4.CALS Center for Applied Aquatic EcologyNorth Carolina State UniversityRaleighUSA

Personalised recommendations