Advertisement

Towards a Cultural View on Quality Science Teaching

  • Glen Aikenhead
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter’s cultural view on quality science teaching affords perspectives on school science that represent a plurality of aims, allows a reconceptualization of school science content so it can engender quality science teaching rather than inhibit it, and, through the intricate, context-laden, interplay between relevance and students’ self-identities explicitly answers the question: “Why would students want to engage with school science in the first place?” In developing these perspectives and reconceptualizations the author offers nine indicators of what quality science teaching is, and six indicators of what it is not. These indicators relate to “evidence” that could reflect the extent to which quality science teaching may be occurring in a classroom, in a school, and in a school system. “Evidence” is used here in the sense of the conventional meaning of “evidence” in qualitative or quantitative social science research: trustworthy evidence—consequently, the suggested indicators of quality science teaching relate to evidence-based practice in the social science sense of trustworthy evidence.

Keywords

Science Teaching Science Teacher School Science Science Content Meaningful Learning 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Abd-El-Khalick, F., Waters, M., & Le, A-P. (2008). Representations of nature of science in high school chemistry textbooks over the past four decades. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45, 835–855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adamuti-Trache, M., & Andres, L. (2008). Embarking on and persisting in scientific fields of study: Cultural capital, gender, and curriculum along the science pipeline. International Journal of Science Education, 30, 1557–1584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aikenhead, G. S. (1991). Logical reasoning in science & technology. Toronto: Wiley of Canada.Google Scholar
  4. Aikenhead, G. S. (2006). Science education for everyday life: Evidence-based practice. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  5. Alberts, B. (2000). Some thoughts on science as inquiry. In J. Minstrell & E. H. van Zee (Eds.), Inquiring into inquiry learning and teaching in science (pp. 3–13). Washington: American Association for the Advancement of Science.Google Scholar
  6. Baram-Tsabari, A., Sethi, R. J., Bry, L., & Yarden, A. (2006). Using questions sent to an ask-a-scientist site to identity children’s interests in science. Science Education, 90, 1050–1072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barnes, M. B., & Barnes, L. W. (2005). Using inquiry processes to investigate knowledge, skills, and perceptions of diverse learners: An approach to working with prospective and current science teachers. In A. J. Rodrigues & R. S. Kitchen (Eds.), Preparing mathematics and science teachers for diverse classrooms: Promising strategies for transformative pedagogy (pp. 61–86). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  8. Bennett, J., Lubben, F., & Hogarth, S. (2006). Bringing science to life: A synthesis of the research evidence on the effects of context-based and STS approaches to science teaching. Science Education, 91, 347–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Berry, A., Loughran, J., & Mulhall, P. (2007). Values associated with representing science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. In D. Corrigan, J. Dillon, & R. Gunstone (Eds.), The re-emergence of values in science education (pp. 149–163). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  10. Bianchini, J. A., Cavazos, L. M., & Helm, J. V. (2000). From professional lives to inclusive practice: Science teachers and scientists’ views of gender and ethnicity in science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 511–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brandt, C. B. (2008). Scientific discourse in the academy: A case study of an American Indian undergraduate. Science Education, 92, 825–847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brickhouse, N. W. (2001). Embodying science: A feminist perspective on learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 282–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brotman, J. S., & Moore, F. M. (2008). Girls and science: A review of four themes in the science education literature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45, 971–1002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brown, B. A., Reveles, J. M., & Kelly, G. (2005). Scientific literacy and discursive identity: A theoretical framework for understanding science education. Science Education, 89, 779–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bulte, A. M. W., Westbroek, H. B., De Jong, O., & Pilot, A. (2006). A research approach to designing chemistry education using authentic practices as contexts. International Journal of Science Education, 28, 1063–1086.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Calabrese Barton, A, & Tan, E. (2009). Funds of knowledge and discourses and hybrid space. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 50–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Carlone, H. B. (2004). The cultural production of science in reform-based physics: Girls’ access, participation and resistance. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 392–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Carlone, H. B., & Johnson, A. (2007). Understanding the science experiences of successful women of color: Science identity as an analytic lens. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 1187–1218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Chin, C., & Osborne, J. (2008). Students’ questions: A potential resource for teaching and learning science. Studies in Science Education, 44, 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Chin, P., Munby, H., Hutchinson, N. L., Taylor, J., & Clark, F. (2004). Where’s the science? Understanding the form and function of workplace science. In E. Scanlon, P. Murphy, J. Thomas, & E. Whitelegg (Eds.), Reconsidering science learning (pp. 118–134). New York: RoutledgeFalmer.Google Scholar
  21. Chin, P., Zanibbi, M., Dalgarno, N., Poth, C., & Ayala, G. (2007). Teaching science for the workplace? An analysis of Canadian science curriculum documents. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 7, 107–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Chinn, P. W. U. (2007). Decolonizing methodologies and Indigenous knowledge: The role of culture, place and personal experience in professional development. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 1247–1268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Cleaves, A. (2005). The formation of science choices in secondary school. International Journal of Science Education, 27, 471–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Costa, V. (1997). How teacher and students study ‘all that matters’ in high school chemistry. International Journal of Science Education, 19, 1005–1023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Daniell, E. (2006). Every other Thursday: Stories and strategies from successful woman scientists. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Dori, Y. J., & Tal, R. T. (2000). Formal and informal collaborative projects: Engaging in industry with environmental awareness. Science Education, 84, 95–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Duggan, S., & Gott, R. (2002). What sort of science education do we really need? International Journal of Science Education, 24, 661–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Eisenhart, M., Finkel, E., & Marion, S. (1996). Creating the conditions for scientific literacy: A re-examination. American Educational Research Journal, 33, 261–295.Google Scholar
  29. Elmore, R. F. (1996). Getting to scale with good educational practice. Harvard Education Review, 66, 1–26.Google Scholar
  30. Fensham, P. J. (1993). Academic influence on school science curricula. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 25, 53–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Fensham, P. J. (2007). Values in the measurement of students’ science achievement in TIMSS and PISA. In D. Corrigan, J. Dillon, & R. Gunstone (Eds.), The re-emergence of values in science education (pp. 215–229). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  32. Fowler, S. R., Zeidler, D. L., & Sadler, T. D. (2009). Moral sensitivity in the context of socioscientific issues in high school science students. International Journal of Science Education, 31, 279–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Frederick, W. A. (1991). Science and technology education: An engineer’s perspective. In S. K. Majumdar, L. M. Rosenfeld, P. A. Rubba, E. W. Miller, & R. F. Schmalz (Eds.), Science education in the United States: Issues, crises and priorities (pp. 386–393). Easton: The Pennsylvania Academy of Science.Google Scholar
  34. Habermas, J. (1972). Knowledge and human interests. London: Heinemman.Google Scholar
  35. Hildebrand, G. M. (2007). Diversity, values and the science curriculum. In D. Corrigan, J. Dillon, & R. Gunstone (Eds.), The re-emergence of values in science education (pp. 45–60). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  36. Hodson, D. (2006). What we should prioritize learning about science. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 6, 293–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hodson, D. (2009). Towards scientific literacy: A teachers’ guide to the history, philosophy and sociology of science. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  38. Hunt, A., & Millar, R. (2000). AS science for public understanding. Oxford: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  39. Jarman, R., & McClune, B. (2007). Developing scientific literacy: Using news media in the classroom. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Johnson, A. C. (2007). Unintended consequences: How science professors discourage women of color. Science Education, 91, 805–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kolstø, S. D. (2001). ‘To trust or not to trust, …’—pupils’ ways of judging information encountered in a socio-scientific issue. International Journal of Science Education, 23, 877–901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kortland, J. (2001). A problem posing approach to teaching decision making about the waste issue. Utrecht, The Netherlands: University of Utrecht Cdβ Press.Google Scholar
  43. Larochelle, M. (2007). Disciplinary power and the school form. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 2, 711–720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Larson, J. O. (1995, April). Fatima’s rules and other elements of an unintended chemistry curriculum. Paper presented to the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  45. Law, N. (2002). Scientific literacy: Charting the terrains of a multifaceted enterprise. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 2, 151–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lee, Y-C. (2008). Exploring the roles and nature of science: A case study of severe acute respiratory syndrome. International Journal of Science Education, 30, 515–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Löfgren, L., & Helldén, G. (2009). A longitudinal study showing how students use a molecule concept when explaining everyday situations. International Journal of Science Education, 31, 1631–1655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Loughran, J., & Derry, N. (1997). Researching teaching for understanding: The students’ perspective. International Journal of Science Education, 19, 925–938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lyons, T. (2006). The puzzle of falling enrolments in physics and chemistry courses: Putting some pieces together. Research in Science Education, 36, 285–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Malcolm, C. (2007). The value of science in African cultures. In D. Corrigan, J. Dillon, & R. Gunstone (Eds.), The re-emergence of values in science education (pp. 61–76). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  51. Malone, K. R., & Barabino, G. (2009). Narrations of race in STEM research settings: Identity formation and its discontents. Science Education, 93, 485–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Medina-Jerez, W. (2008). Between local culture and school science: The case of provincial and urban students from eastern Colombia. Research in Science Education, 38, 189–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Milne, C. E., & Taylor, P. C. (1998). Between myth and a hard place. In W. W. Cobern (Ed.), Socio-cultural perspectives on science education (pp. 25–48). Boston: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  54. Mishler, E. G. (1990). Validation in inquiry-guided research: The role of exemplars in narrative studies. Harvard Educational Review, 60, 415–442.Google Scholar
  55. Munby, H., Taylor, J., Chin, P., & Hutchinson, N. L. (2007). Co-op students’ access to shared knowledge in science-rich workplaces. Science Education, 91, 115–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Naughton, W., Schreck, J., & Heikkinen, H. (2008). Seeking evidence for “curricular relevancy” within undergraduate liberal arts chemistry textbooks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45, 174–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Nieswandt, M., & Shanahan, M-C. (2008). “I just want the credit!”—Perceived instrumentality as the main characteristic of boys’ motivation in a grade 11 science course. Research in Science Education, 38, 3–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. OECD. (2006). Evolution of student interest in science and technology studies policy report. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  59. Osborne, J., & Dillon, J. (2008). Science education in Europe: Critical reflections. London: The Nuffield Foundation.Google Scholar
  60. Prins, G. T., Bulte, A. M. W., van Driel, J. H., & Pilot, A. (2008). Selection of authentic modelling practices as contexts for chemistry education. International Journal of Science Education, 30, 1867–1890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Reiss, M. (2007). What should be the aim(s) of school science education? In D. Corrigan, J. Dillon, & R. Gunstone (Eds.), The re-emergence of values in science education (pp. 13–28). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  62. Rennie, L. J. (2007). Learning science outside of school. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 125–167). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  63. Rodrigues, S. (2006). Pupil-appropriate contexts in science lessons: The relationship between themes, purpose and dialogue. Research in Science & Technological Education, 24, 173–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Ryder, J. (2001). Identifying science understanding for functional scientific literacy. Studies in Science Education, 36, 1–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Sadler, T. D. (2009). Situated learning in science education: Socio-scientific issues as contexts for practice. Studies in Science Education, 45, 1–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Sadler, P. M., & Tai, R. H. (2001). Success in introductory college physics: The role of high school preparation. Science Education, 85, 111–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Schreiner, C., & Sjøberg, S. (2007). Science education and youth’s identity construction: Two incompatible projects? In D. Corrigan, J. Dillon, & R. Gunstone (Eds.), The re-emergence of values in science education (pp. 231–247). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  68. Scott, P., Asoko, H., & Leach, J. (2007). Student conceptions and conceptual learning in science. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 31–56). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  69. Shanahan, M-C. (2009). Identity in science learning: Exploring the attention given to agency and structure in studies of identity. Studies in Science Education, 45, 43–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Sillitoe, P. (Ed.). (2007). Local science vs. global science: Approaches to Indigenous knowledge in international development. New York: Berghan Books.Google Scholar
  71. Symington, D., & Tytler, R. (2004). Community leaders’ views of the purposes of science in the compulsory years of schooling. International Journal of Science Education, 26, 1403–1418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Tobias, S. (1990). They’re not dumb, they’re different. Tucson: Research Corporation.Google Scholar
  73. Tobin, K., & McRobbie, C. (1997). Beliefs about the nature of science and the enacted science curriculum. Science and Education, 6, 355–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Tobin, K., Seiler, G., & Smith, M. W. (1999). Educating science teachers for the sociocultural diversity of urban schools. Research in Science Education, 29, 69–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. von Aufschnaiter, C., Erduran, S., Osborne, J., & Simon, S. (2008). Arguing to learn and learning to argue: Case studies of how students’ argumentation relates to their scientific knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45, 101–131.Google Scholar
  76. Weinstein, M. (1998). Playing the paramecium: Science education from the stance of the cultural studies of science. Educational Policy, 12, 484–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Weinstein, M. (2008). Finding science in the school body: Reflections on transgressing the boundaries of science education and the social studies of science. Science Education, 92, 389–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Wood, N. B., Lawrenz, F., & Haroldson, R. (2009). A judicial presentation of evidence of a student culture of “Dealing.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 421–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Yager, R. E., & Krajcik, J. (1989). Success of students in a college physics course with and without experiencing a high school course. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 26, 599–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Glen Aikenhead
    • 1
  1. 1.University of SaskatchewanSaskatoonCanada

Personalised recommendations