Abstract
At the University of British Columbia, as in many universities, the physics department offers courses to a wide variety of students, many of whom are not pursuing Physics as a major but are required to take Physics for their program of choice. So-called “service” courses targeted to this non-major population have historically been taught using the same topics, instructional sequences, and teaching techniques as those designed for Physics majors, even though there are significant differences in the background, motivation, needs, and goals of these two populations. In 2007, motivated by the desire to offer a course to their non-major students that would be more meaningful and relevant to them, the instructors of UBC’s introductory Physics course for non-majors initiated a series of ongoing changes to the course content, instructional sequence, and pedagogical tools. This chapter explores how the instructors’ motivations, goals, and pedagogical content knowledge have interacted with the logistical and cultural constraints of teaching in the context of a major research university to shape these course changes over the first two years of implementation. Results from ongoing research into the effects of these changes are described and specific examples of how curricular materials and pedagogical methods have evolved are presented.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adams, W. K., Perkins, K. K., Podolefsky, N. S., Dubson, M., Finkelstein, N. D., & Wieman, C. E. (2006). New instrument for measuring student beliefs about physics and learning physics: The Colorado Learning Attitudes about Science Survey. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research (APS), 2, 010101.
Chi, M. T. H., Feltovich, P. J., & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5, 121–152.
Kornell, N., & Bjork, R. A. (2007). The promise and perils of self-regulated study. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 219–224.
Perkins, K. K., Adams, W. K., Pollock, S. J., Finkelstein, N. D., & Wieman, C. E. (2004). Correlating student beliefs with student learning using the Colorado Learning Attitudes about Science Survey. In J. Marx, P. Heron, & S. Franklin (Eds.), Physics Education Research-2004 (Edited by AIP Conference Proceedings 2005, No. 790, pp. 61–64). Melville: American Institute of Physics.
Redish, E. F. (2003). Teaching physics: With the physics suite. New York: Wiley.
Roediger, H. L., Agarwal, P. K., Kang, S. H. K., & Marsh, E. J. (2009). Benefits of testing memory: Best practices and boundary conditions. In G. M. Davies & D. B. Wright (Eds.), New frontiers in applied memory (pp. 1–41). Brighton: Psychology.
Semb, G. B., & Ellis, J. A. (1994). Knowledge taught in school: What is remembered? Review of Educational Research, 64, 253–286.
Tobias, S. (1992). Revitalizing undergraduate science: Why some things work and most don’t. An occasional paper on Neglected Problems in Science Education. Tuscon: Research Corporation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Martinuk, S., Clark, A., Erickson, G. (2011). Re-conceptualizing the Teaching of Physics for Non-majors: Learning from Instructor-Driven Reform. In: Corrigan, D., Dillon, J., Gunstone, R. (eds) The Professional Knowledge Base of Science Teaching. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3927-9_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3927-9_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-3926-2
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-3927-9
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)