Engineering, science and biology
The ICE-theory accounts for two types of functional descriptions of artefacts: function ascriptions relative to use plans and ascriptions of functional roles based on plan-less physicochemical analyses. We put forward the first type as central to technology. In this chapter we continue our discussion of plan-less functional descriptions, and review a number of engineering functional descriptions that seem to challenge the central role of plan-relative function ascriptions. The discussion stays initially within the domain of technology, but provides us with the means to consider also how the ICE-theory fares in dealing with functional descriptions outside this domain.
KeywordsFunction Theory Functional Description Technical Artefact Counterpart Theory Biological Domain
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Ariew, A. and M. Perlman (2002). Introduction. In A. Ariew, R. Cummins, and M. Perlman (Eds.), Functions: New Essays in the Philosophy of Psychology and Biology, pp. 1–4. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Brown, D. C. and L. Blessing (2005). The relationship between function and affordance. In ASME 2005 IDETC/CIE Conference, September 24-28, 2005, Long Beach, California, USA. DECT2005-85017.Google Scholar
- Eekels, J. and W. A. Poelman (1998). Industriële Productontwikkeling. Deel 1: Basiskennis. Utrecht: Lemma.Google Scholar
- Galison, P. (1986). How Experiments End. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Gero, J. S. (1990). Design prototypes: A knowledge representation schema for design. AI Magazine 11(4), 26–36.Google Scholar
- Gooding, D., T. Pinch, and S. Schaffer (Eds.) (1989). The Uses of Experiment, Cambridge.Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Hacking, I. (1983). Representing and Intervening. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Hubka, V. and W. E. Eder (1988). Theory of Technical Systems: A Total Concept Theory for Engineering Design. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
- Pahl, G., W. Beitz, J. Feldhusen, and K.-H. Grote (2007). Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach (third ed.). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
- Radder, H. (Ed.) (2003). The Philosophy of Scientific Experimentation, Pittsburgh. University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
- Roozenburg, N. F. M. and J. Eekels (1995). Product Design: Fundamentals and Methods. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar