Molecular Mechanics

Chapter

Abstract

Molecular mechanics (MM) rests on a view of molecules as balls held together by springs. The potential energy of a molecule can be written as the sum of terms involving bond stretching, angle bending, dihedral angles and nonbonded interactions. Giving these terms explicit mathematical forms constitutes devising a forcefield, and giving actual numbers to the constants in the forcefield constitutes parameterizing the field. An example is given of the devising and parameterization of an MM forcefield. Calculations on biomolecules is a very important application of MM, and the pharmaceutical industry designs new drugs with the aid of MM. Organic synthesis now makes considerable use of MM, which enables chemists to estimate which products are likely to be favored and to devise more realistic routes to a target molecule. In molecular dynamics MM is used to generate the forces acting on molecules and hence to calculate their motions.

Keywords

Transition State Dihedral Angle Potential Energy Function Angle Error Quantum Mechanical Method 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    General references to molecular mechanics: (a) Rappe AK, Casewit CL (1997) Molecular mechanics across chemistry. University Science Books, Sausalito, CA; website http://www.chm.colostate.edu/mmac. (b) Leach AR (2001) Molecular modelling, principles and applications, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, Essex (UK),  chapter 4. (c) Burkert U, Allinger NL (1982) Molecular mechanics, ACS Monograph 177. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC. (d) Allinger NL (1976) Calculation of molecular structures and energy by force methods. In: Gold V, Bethell D (eds) Advances in physical organic chemistry, vol 13. Academic, New York. (e) Clark T (1985) A handbook of computational chemistry. Wiley, New York. (f) Levine IN (2000) Quantum chemistry, 5th edn. Prentice-Hall, Engelwood Cliffs, NJ, pp 664–680. (g) Issue no. 7 of Chem Rev (1993), 93. (h) Conformational energies: Pettersson I, Liljefors T (1996) In: Reviews in Computational Chemistry, vol 9, Lipkowitz KB, Boyd DB (eds) VCH Weinheim. (i) Inorganic and organometallic compounds: Landis CR, Root DM, Cleveland T (1995) In: Reviews in Computational Chemistry, vol 6, Lipkowitz KB, Boyd DB (eds) VCH Weinheim. (j) Parameterization: Bowen JP, Allinger NL (1991) Reviews in Computational Chemistry, vol 6, Lipkowitz KB, Boyd DB (eds) VCH Weinheim
  2. 2.
    MM history: (a) References 1. (b) Engler EM, Andose JD, Schleyer PvR (1973) J Am Chem Soc 95:8005 and references therein. (c) Molecular mechanics up to the end of 1967 is reviewed in detail in: Williams JE, Stang PJ, Schleyer PvR (1968) Ann Rev Phys Chem 19:531Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    (a) Westheimer FH, Mayer JE (1946) J Chem Phys 14:733. (b) Hill TL (1946) J Chem Phys 14:465. (c) Dostrovsky I, Hughes ED, Ingold CK (1946) J Chem Soc 173. (d) Westheimer FH (1947) J Chem Phys 15:252Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    (a) Ma B, Lii J-H, Chen K, Allinger NL (1997) J Am Chem Soc 119:2570 and references therein. (b) In an MM4 study of amines, agreement with experiment was generally good: Chen K-H, Lii J-H, Allinger NL (2007) J Comp Chem 28:2391. (c) Five papers, using MM4, on Alcohols, ethers, carbohydrates, and related compounds. J Comp Chem 24 (2003): Allinger NL, Chen K-H, Lii J-H, Durkin KA, 1447; Lii J-H, Chen K-H, Durkin A, Allinger NL, 1473; Lii J-H, Chen K-H, Grindley TB, Allinger NL, 1490; Lii J-H, Chen K-H, Allinger NL, 1504; (2004) J Phys Chem A 108; Lii J-H, Chen K-H, Allinger NL, 3006Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    (a) Information on and references to molecular mechanics programs may be found in references 1 and the website of reference 1a. (b) For papers on the popular Merck Molecular Force Field and the MM4 forcefield (and information on some others) see the issue of J Comp Chem 17 (1996)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    The force constant is defined as the proportionality constant in the equation force = k x extension(of length or angle), so integrating force with respect to extension to get the energy (= force x extension) needed to stretch the bond gives E = (k/2)(extension)2, i.e. k = force constant = 2k stretch (or 2k bend)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    (a) A brief discussion and some parameters: Atkins PW (1994) Physical chemistry, 5th edn. Freeman, New York, pp 772, 773; it is pointed out here that e−r/σ is actually a much better representation of the compressive potential than is r−12. (b) Moore WJ (1972) Physical chemistry, 4th edn. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, p 158 (From Hirschfelder JO, Curtis CF, Bird RB (1954) Molecular theory of gases and liquids. Wiley, New York). Note that our k nb is called 4ε here and must be multiplied by 8.31/1000 to convert it to our units of kJ mol−1 Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Infrared spectroscopy: Silverstein RM, Bassler GC, Morrill TC (1981) Spectrometric identification of organic compounds, 4th edn. Wiley, New York,  Chapter 3
  9. 9.
    Different methods of structure determination give somewhat different results; this is discussed in reference 4(a) and in: (a) Ma B, Lii J-H, Schaefer HF, Allinger NL (1996) J Phys Chem 100:8763 and (b) Domenicano A, Hargittai I (eds) (1992) Accurate molecular structures. Oxford Science, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    To properly parameterize a molecular mechanics forcefield by calculations only high-level ab initio (or density functional) calculations would actually be used, but this does not affect the principle being demonstratedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Reference 1b, section 4.8Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    MM3: Allinger NL, Yuh YH, Lii J-H (1989) J Am Chem Soc 111:8551. The calculation was performed with MM3 as implemented in Spartan (reference 15)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Eksterowicz JE, Houk KN (1993) Chem Rev 93:2439Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Smith MB, March J (2000) March’s advanced organic chemistry. Wiley, New York, pp 284–285Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Spartan is an integrated molecular mechanics, ab initio and semiempirical program with an input/output graphical interface. It is available in UNIX workstation and PC versions: Wavefunction Inc., http://www.wavefun.com, 18401 Von Karman, Suite 370, Irvine CA 92715, USA. As of mid-2009, the latest version of Spartan was Spartan 09. The name arises from the simple or “Spartan” user interface.
  16. 16.
    Ref. [1c], pp 182–184Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gundertofte K, Liljefors T, Norby P-O, Pettersson I (1996) J Comp Chem 17:429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Comparison of various forcefields for geometry (and vibrational frequencies): Halgren TA (1996) J Comp Chem 17:553Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    The Merck force field (ref. [18]) often gives geometries that are satisfactory for energy calculations (i.e. for single-point energies, no geometry optimization with the quantum mechanical method) with quantum mechanical methods; this could be very useful for large molecules: Hehre WJ, Yu J, Klunzinger PE (1997) A guide to molecular mechanics and molecular orbital calculations in Spartan. Wavefunction Inc., Irvine, CA,  chapter 4
  20. 20.
    Halgren TA (1996) J Comp Chem 17:490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nicklaus MC (1997) J Comp Chem 18:1056; the difference between CHARMM and CHARMm is explained hereGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    (a) www.amber.ucsf.edu/amber/amber.html (b) Cornell WD, Cieplak P, Bayly CI, Gould IR, Merz KM, Ferguson DM, Spellmeyer DC, Fox T, Caldwell JW, Kollman PA (1995) J Am Chem Soc 117:5179 (c) Barone V, Capecchi G, Brunel Y, Andries M-LD, Subra R (1997) J Comp Chem 18:1720Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    (a) Field MJ, Bash PA, Karplus M (1990) J Comp Chem 11:700. (b) Bash PA, Field MJ, Karplus M (1987) J Am Chem Soc 109: 8092Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Singh UC, Kollman P (1986) J Comp Chem 7:718Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    (a) Reference 1b, chapter 10. (b) Höltje H-D, Folkers G (1996) Molecular modelling, applications in medicinal chemistry. VCH, Weinheim, Germany. (c) van de Waterbeemd H, Testa B, Folkers G (eds) (1997) Computer-assisted lead finding and optimization. VCH, Weinheim, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    (a) Reference 1b, chapter 6. (b) Karplus M, Putsch GA (1990) Nature 347:631. (c) Brooks III CL, Case DA (1993) Chem Rev 93:2487. (d) Eichinger M, Grubmüller H, Heller H, Tavan P (1997) J Comp Chem 18:1729. (e) Marlow GE, Perkyns JS, Pettitt BM (1993) Chem Rev 93:2503. (f) Aqvist J, Warshel A (1993) Chem Rev 93:2523
  27. 27.
    Reference 1b, pp 410–456Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lipkowitz KB, Peterson MA (1993) Chem Rev 93:2463Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    (a) Saunders M (1991) Science 253:330. (b) See too Dodziuk H, Lukin O, Nowinski KS (1999) Polish J Chem 73:299Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    (a) Hehre WJ, Radom L, Schleyer pvR, Pople JA (1986) Ab initio Molecular Orbital Theory. Wiley, New York (b) M.D. Harmony, V.W. Laurie, R.L. Kuczkowski, R.H. Schwenderman, D.A. Ramsay, F.J. Lovas, W.H. Lafferty, A.G. Makai, Molecular Structures of Gas-Phase Polyatomic Molecules Determined by Spectroscopic Methods”, J. Physical and Chemical Reference Data, 1979, 8, 619–721 (c) Huang J, Hedberg K (1989) J Am Chem Soc 111:6909Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lii J-H, Allinger NL (1992) J Comp Chem 13:1138. The MM3 program can be bought from Tripos Associates of St. Louis, MissouriGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Nevins N, Allinger NL (1996) J Comp Chem 17:730 and references thereinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Lipkowitz KB (1995) J Chem Ed 72:1070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    (a) Wiberg K (1996) Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 25:312. (b) Issue no. 5 of Chem Rev, 1989, 89. (c) Inagaki S, Ishitani Y, Kakefu T (1994) J Am Chem Soc 116:5954. (d) Nagase S (1995) Acc Chem Res 28:469. (e) Gronert S, Lee JM (1995) J Org Chem 60:6731. (f) Sella A, Basch H, Hoz S (1996) J Am Chem Soc 118:416. (g) Grime S (1996) J Am Chem Soc 118:1529. (h) Balaji V, Michl J (1988) Pure Appl Chem 60:189. (i) Wiberg KB, Ochterski JW (1997) J Comp Chem 18:108Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Seeman JI (1983) Chem Rev 83:83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Added in press:Google Scholar
  37. 36.
    Handley CM, Popelier PLA (2010) The use of neural networks used to devise forcefields. J Phys Chem A 114:3371CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dept. ChemistryTrent UniversityPeterboroughCanada

Personalised recommendations