Abstract
The discussion in the previous chapter of the evidence for the early use of fire has demonstrated the complexities involved in identifying the early stages of human control over fire and emphasized the need for a comprehensive approach to their study. The presence of burned flint items at the site of GBY provides a unique opportunity to investigate this pressing issue with a different methodological approach. This methodology draws on a variety of ethnographic, archaeological, and ethnoarchaeological studies, which generally suggest that small lithic products can be used as spatial indicators for a variety of activities, including the use of fire in the form of hearths. The theoretical foundations of this approach are presented in this chapter, which integrates the different components of the research program.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
A thorough discussion of fire ecology, and specifically of the probability of natural fire at GBY, is included in Chapter 4.
- 2.
The use of discoloration of flint as a distinctive feature for the identification of burning is not a reliable measure for the flints of GBY; embedded within the waterlogged sediments, the majority of flint items are darkly patinated.
- 3.
As previously noted, a thorough discussion of fire ecology, and specifically of the probability of natural fire at GBY, is included in Chapter 4.
- 4.
Layers I-4 and II-5, revealed during the first season of excavations at the site, were partially wet-sieved; sampling included a single full bucket from each sub-square of a given depth unit of excavation.
- 5.
The principles of the TL method are discussed in Section 1.2.
- 6.
- 7.
The kernel function is based on the quadratic kernel function described in Silverman 1986: 76, Equation 4.5.
References
Alperson-Afil N, Hovers E. Differential use of space in the Neandertal site of Amud Cave, Israel. Eurasian Prehist. 2005;3(1):3–22.
Alperson-Afil N, Richter D, Goren-Inbar N. Phantom hearths and the use of fire at Gesher Benot Ya‘aqov, Israel. PaleoAnthropol. 2007;1:1–15. http://www.paleoanthro.org/journal/content/PA20070001.pdf.
Ashkenazi S, Motro U, Goren-Inbar N, Biton R, Rabinovich R. New morphometric parameters for assessment of body size in the fossil freshwater crab assemblage from the Acheulian site of Gesher Benot Ya‘aqov, Israel. J Archaeol Sci. 2005;32:675–89.
Austin LA, Bergman CA, Roberts MB, Wilhelmsen KH. Archaeology of excavated areas. In: Roberts MB, Parfitt SA, editors. Boxgrove: a Middle Pleistocene hominid site at Eartham Quarry, Boxgrove, West Sussex. London: English Heritage; 1999. p. 312–77.
Bellomo RV, Harris JWK. Preliminary report of actualistic studies of fire within Virunga National Park, Zaire: towards an understanding of archaeological occurrences. In: Boaz NT, editor. Evolution of environments and Hominidae in the African Western Rift Valley. Martinsville: Virginia Museum of Natural History; 1990. p. 317–38.
Binford LR. Dimensional analysis of behavior and site structure: learning from an Eskimo hunting stand. Am Antiquity. 1978; 43:330–61.
Binford LR. In pursuit of the past: decoding the archaeological record. London: Thames & Hudson; 1983.
Brooks AS, Yellen JE. The preservation of activity areas in the archaeological record: ethnoarchaeological and archaeological work in Northwest Ngamiland, Botswana. In: Kent S, editor. Method and theory for activity area research: an ethnoarchaeological approach. New York: Columbia University Press; 1987. p. 63–106.
Canti MG, Linford N. The effects of fire on archaeological soils and sediments: temperture and colour relationships. Proc Prehist Soc. 2000;66:385–95.
Clark JE. Flintknapping and debitage disposal among the Lacandon Maya of Chiapas, Mexico. In: Staski E, Sutro LD, editors. The ethnoarchaeology of refuse disposal. Arizona: Arizona State University; 1991. p. 63–78.
Crabtree DE, Butler BR. Notes on experiments in flint knapping I: heat treatments of silica minerals. Tebiwa. 1964;7(1):1–6.
DeBoer WR. The archaeological record as preserved death assemblage. In: Moore JA, Keene AS, editors. Archaeological hammers and. theories. New York: Academic; 1983. p. 19–36.
Dunnell RC, Stein JK. Theoretical issues in the interpretation of microartifacts. Geoarchaeology. 1989;4:31–42.
Feibel CS. Archaeological sediments in lake margin environments. In: Stein JK, Farrand WR, editors. Sediments in archaeological contexts. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press; 2001. p. 127–48.
Fladmark KR. Microdebitage analysis: initial considerations. J Archaeol Sci. 1982;9:205–20.
Galanidou N. Patterns in caves: foragers, horticulturists, and the use of space. J Anthropol Archaeol. 2000;19:243–75.
Gilead I. A Middle Paleolithic open-air site near Tell Far‘a, Western Negev: preliminary report. Isr Expl J. 1980;30:52–62.
Gilead I, Grigson C. Far‘a II: a Middle Paleolithic open-air site in the Northern Negev, Israel. Proc Prehist Soc. 1984;50:71–97.
Goren-Inbar N, Sharon G. Invisible handaxes and visible Acheulian biface technology at Gesher Benot Ya‘aqov, Israel. In: Goren-Inbar N, Sharon G, editors. Axe age: Acheulian tool-making from quarry to discard. Oxford: Oxbow Books; 2006. p. 111–35.
Goren-Inbar N, Lister A, Werker E, Chech M. A butchered elephant skull and associated artifacts from the Acheulian site of Gesher Benot Ya‘aqov, Israel. Paléorient. 1994;20(1):99–12.
Haberman SJ. The analysis of residuals in cross-classified tables. Biometrics. 1973;29:205–20.
Hietala H. Boker Tachtit: spatial distributions. In: Marks AE, editor. Prehistory and paleoenvironments in the Central Negev, Israel. Dallas: Southern Methodist University; 1983. p. 191–216.
Hull KL. Identification of cultural site formation processes through microdebitage analysis. Am Antiquity. 1987;52:772–83.
Isaac GL. The archaeology of human origins: studies of the Lower Pleistocene in East Africa: 1971–1981. In: Wendorf F, Close AE, editors. Advances in world archaeology, vol. 3. New York: Academic; 1984. p. 1–87.
Julig PJ, Long DGF, Schroeder B, Rink WJ, Richter D, Schwarcz HP. Geoarchaeology and new research at Jerf al-Ajla Cave, Syria. Geoarchaeology. 1999;14:821–48.
Leesch D, Bullinger J, Cattin M-I, Müller W, Plumettaz N. Hearths and hearth-related activities in Magdalenian open-air sites: the case studies of Champréveyres and Monruz (Switzerland) and their relevance to an understanding of Upper Paleolithic site structure. Paper presented at the Magdalenian in Central Europe: New Finds and Concepts. 20–23 September 2005, Poland: Rzeszów; 2005.
Mallol C, Marlowe FW, Wood BM, Porter CC. Earth, wind, and fire: ethnoarchaeological signals of Hadza fires. J Archaeol Sci. 2007;34:2035–52.
Metcalfe D, Heath KM. Microrefuse and site structure: the hearths and floors of the Heartbreak Hotel. Am Antiquity. 1990;55:781–96.
Nadel D. Indoor/outdoor flint knapping and minute debitage remains: the evidence from the Ohalo II submerged camp (19.5 KY, Jordan Valley). Lithic Technol. 2001;26:118–37.
O’Connell JF. Alyawara site structure and its archaeological implications. Am Antiquity. 1987;52:74–108.
Purdy BA. Fractures for the archaeologist. In: Swanson E, editor. Lithic technology: making and using stone tools. Paris: Mouton; 1975. p. 133–41.
Purdy BA, Brooks HK. Thermal alteration of silica minerals: an archeological approach. Science. 1971;173:322–5.
Rabinovich R, Gaudzinski-Windheuser S, Goren-Inbar N. Systematic butchering of fallow deer (Dama) at the Early Middle Pleistocene Acheulian site of Gesher Benot Ya‘aqov (Israel). J Hum Evol. 2008;54:134–49.
Schiegl S, Goldberg P, Bar-Yosef O, Weiner S. Ash deposits in Hayonim and Kebara Caves, Israel: macroscopic, microscopic and mineralogical observations, and their archaeological implications. J Archaeol Sci. 1996;23:763–81.
Simek JF. Integrating pattern and context in spatial archaeology. J Archaeol Sci. 1984;11:405–20.
Simms SR. The archaeological structure of a Bedouin camp. J Archaeol Sci. 1988;15:197–211.
Spurling B, Hayden B. Ethnoarchaeology and intrasite spatial analysis: A case study from the Australian Western desert. In: Hietala HJ, editor. Intrasite spatial analysis in archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1984. p. 224–41.
Stapert D. Middle Palaeolithic dwellings: fact or fiction? Some applications of the ring and sector method. Palaeohistoria. 1990;32:1–19.
Stein JK, Teltser PA. Size distributions of artifact classes: combining macro-and-micro-fractions. Geoarchaeology. 1989;4:1–30.
Stevenson MG. Beyond the formation of hearth-associated artifact assemblages. In: Kroll EM, Price TD, editors. The Interpretation. of archaeological spatial patterning. New York: Plenum; 1991. p. 269–99
Stiner MC, Kuhn SL, Weiner S, Bar-Yosef O. Differential Burning.recrystallization, and fragmentation of archaeological bone. J Archaeol Sci. 1995;22:223–37.
Vance ED. Microdebitage and archaeological activity analysis. Archaeology. 1987;40(4):58–9.
Vaquero M, Pastó I. The definition of spatial units in Middle Palaeolithic sites: the hearth-related assemblages. J Archaeol Sci. 2001;28:1209–20.
Villa P, Bon F, Castel J-C. Fuel, fire and fireplaces in the Paleolithic of Western Europe. Rev Archaeol. 2002;23(1):33–42.
Yellen JE. Archaeological approaches to the present: models for reconstructing the past. New York: Academic; 1977.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Alperson-Afil, N., Goren-Inbar, N. (2010). Framework of Research. In: The Acheulian Site of Gesher Benot Ya’aqov Volume II. Vertebrate Paleobiology and Paleoanthropology. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3765-7_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3765-7_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-3764-0
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-3765-7
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)