Advertisement

Contracting for Quality Improvement and Financing in Public Universities of Catalonia, Spain

  • Josep M. Vilalta
  • Joaquim Brugué
Chapter
Part of the Higher Education Dynamics book series (HEDY, volume 30)

Abstract

Since 1997 the autonomous government of Catalonia (Spain) and the public universities have been using a new quality instrument – a four-year programme-contract. The initiative was driven by a need to optimise higher education costs and increase universities’ responsiveness to societal needs. In order to achieve these goals, the government attempted to vitalize university management and bring the attention to the issues of efficiency and quality in universities’ operation. The contract constitutes a set of targets for improving academic quality and efficiency in a university. The strength of the instrument lies in the fact that it combines government control with institutional autonomy. While the government can steer the system in a desired direction by setting priorities, universities retain their freedom to develop their individual profile and strategies. The main challenge of the system has to do with the difficulties of designing clear and quantifiable policy objectives, and obtaining the commitment of university actors to meet these objectives.

Keywords

High Education Policy Quality Policy Graduate Employment Foreign Language Skill Spanish High Education 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Chevaillier, T. (1998). Moving away from central planning: Using contracts to steer higher education in France. European Journal of Education, 33(1), 65–76.Google Scholar
  2. DURSI (nd). Ministry of Universities, Research and the Information Society, Government of Catalonia. www10.gencat.net/dursi. Accessed 4 February 2009.Google Scholar
  3. Höltta, S. (1998). The funding of universities in Finland: Towards goal-oriented government steering. European Journal of Education, 33(1), 55–63.Google Scholar
  4. Jongbloed, B., Vossensteyn, H. (2001). Keeping up performances: An international survey of performance-based funding in higher education. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 23(2), 127–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Mora, J-G. (2004). A decade of quality assurance in Spanish universities. In S. Schwarz, D. F. Westerheijden (eds.), Accreditation and evaluation in the European Higher Education Area. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  6. Neave, G. (1998). The evaluative state reconsidered. European Journal of Education, 33(3), 265–284.Google Scholar
  7. Neave, G., van Vught, F. (1991). Prometheus bound: The changing relationship between government and higher education in Eastern Europe. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  8. Paradeise, C., Reale, E., Bleiklie, I., Ferlie, E. (2009). University governance: Western European comparative perspectives. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Josep M. Vilalta
    • 1
  • Joaquim Brugué
    • 2
  1. 1.Catalan Association of Public Universities (ACUP)BarcelonaSpain
  2. 2.Autonomous University of BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations