Advertisement

Airborne Remote Sensing at Millimeter Wave Frequencies

  • Helmut Essen
Chapter
Part of the Remote Sensing and Digital Image Processing book series (RDIP, volume 15)

Abstract

Advanced radar sensors are able to deliver highly resolved images of the earth surface with considerable information content, as polarimetric information, 3-D-features and robustness against changing environmental and operational conditions. This is possible also under adverse weather conditions, where electro-optical sensors are limited in their performance.

Keywords

Base Length Corner Reflector Slant Range Range Gradient Depression Angle 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank all contributors from FGAN-FHR, Department MHS, namely, Hartmut Schimpf, Thorsten Brehm and Manfred Hägelen. Thank is also due to the former colleague Stephan Boehmsdorff, who is now with the German Procurement Office BWB. Special thank is due to the colleagues of Zurich University, namely Erich Meier, Maurice Ruegg and Christophe Magnard, as well as the technology center of the Swiss Federal Department of Defence (armasuisse) and especially Peter Wellig for the wide support and cooperation. Part of the work was done under contract with the German Procurement Office BWB.

References

  1. Almorox-Gonzlez P, Gonzlez-Partida JT, Burgos-Garca M, Dorta-Naranjo BP, de la Morena-Alvarez-Palencia C, Arche-Andradas L (2007) Portable high-resolution LFM-CW radar sensor in millimeter-waveband. In: Proceedings of SENSORCOMM, Valencia, Spain, pp 5–9, October 2007Google Scholar
  2. Berens P (1999) SAR with ultra-high resolution using synthetic bandwidth. In: Proceedings of IGARSS 1999, vol 3. Hamburg, Germany, 28 June–2 July 1999Google Scholar
  3. Boehmsdorff S, Essen H (1998) MEMPHIS an experimental platform for millimeterwave radar, DGON IRS 1998, München, pp 405–411Google Scholar
  4. Boehmsdorff S, Bers K, Brehm T, Essen H, Jäger K (2001) Detection of urban areas in multispectral data. In: IEEE/ISPRS Joint workshop on remote sensing and data fusion over urban areasGoogle Scholar
  5. Brenner AR, Ender JHG (2002) First experimental results achieved with the new very wideband SAR system Pamir. In: Proceedings of EUSAR 2002, pp 81–86Google Scholar
  6. Brooker GM, Hennessy RC, Lobsey CR, Bishop MV, Widzyk-Capehart E (2007) Seeing through dust and water vapor: millimeter wave radar sensors for mining applications. J Field Robot 24(7):527–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Curlander JC, McDonough RN (1991) Synthetic aperture radar – systems and signal processing. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Dreuillet Ph, Cantalloube H, Colin E, Dubois-Fernandezx P, Dupuis X, Fromage P, Garestier F, Heuze D, Oriot H, Peron JL, Peyret J, Bonin G, du Plessis OR, Nouvel JF, Vaizan B (2006) The ONERA RAMSES SAR: latest significant results and future developments. In: Proceedings of 2006 IEEE Conference on Radar, p 7, 24–27 April 2006Google Scholar
  9. Edrich M (2004) Design overview and flight test results of the miniaturised SAR sensor MISAR. In: 1st European Radar Conference, EURAD 2004, pp 205–208Google Scholar
  10. Essen H, Baars EP (1986) Millimeter wave transmission through man-made obscurations in a battlefield environment. AGARD Multifunction Radar for Airborne Applications 1 p (SEE N87–18721 11–32)Google Scholar
  11. Essen H, Schimpf H, Wahlen A (2003) Improvement of the millimeterwave SAR MEMPHIS for very high resolution (in German). GFAN-FHR Technical Report, Werthhoven, May 2003Google Scholar
  12. Hägelen M, Briese G, Essen H, Bertuch T, Knott P, Tessmann A (2008) A millimeterwave landing aid approach for helicopters under brown-out conditions. In: IEEE RadarConference, RomeGoogle Scholar
  13. Henry JC (1991) The Lincoln laboratory 35 GHz airborne SAR imaging radar system. In: Telesystems Conference, 1991. Proceedings, vol 1, pp 353–358, 26–27 March 1991Google Scholar
  14. Keel BM, Saffold JA, Walbridge MR, Chadwick J (1998) Non-linear stepped chirp waveforms with sub-pulse processing for range sidelobe suppression. In: Proceedings of SPIE, vol 3395. Orlando, pp 87–98Google Scholar
  15. Kendra JR, Sarabandi K, Ulaby FT (1995) Experimental studies of dense media scattering. In: Antennas and propagation society international symposium, 1995. AP-S Digest 4(18–23 June 1995):1712–1715Google Scholar
  16. Koch DB, Tranter WH (1990) Processing considerations for hybrid waveforms utilizing complementary phase coding and linear frequency stepping. In: IEEE Int’l Radar Conference, pp 606–611, May 1990Google Scholar
  17. Kulpa KS, Misiurewicz J (2006) Stretch processing for long integration time passive covert radar. In: International Conference on Radar, Shanghai, 16–19 October 2006Google Scholar
  18. Levanon N (December 2002) Stepped-frequency pulse-train radar signal. IEE Proc Radar Sonar Navig 149:297–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Magnard C, Meier E, Ruegg M, Brehm T, Essen H (2007) High resolution millimeter wave SAR interferometry. In: Proceedings of GARSS 2007, Barcelona, pp 5061–5064, 23–28 July 2007Google Scholar
  20. Maron DE (1990) Frequency-jumpedburst waveforms with stretch processing. In: IEEE 1990 International Radar Conference, Arlington, VA, pp 274–279, 7–10 May 1990Google Scholar
  21. Marshall JS, Palmer WM (1948) The distribution of raindrops with size. J Meteorol 5:165–166Google Scholar
  22. Morsdorf F, Kötz B, Meier E, Itten KI, Allgöwer B (15 September 2006) Estimation of LAI and fractional cover from small footprint airborne laser scanning data based on gap fraction. Remote Sens Environ 104(1):50–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nüßler D, Essen H, von Wahl N, Zimmermann R, Rötzel S, Willms I (2007) Millimeter wave propagation through dust. In: Symposium Digest, SPIE Conference on Remote Sensing, CardiffGoogle Scholar
  24. Rangwala M, Wang F, Sarabandi K (2007) Study of millimeter-wave radar for helicopter assisted landing. In: IEEE Proceedings of Geoscience and Remote Sensing, BarcelonaGoogle Scholar
  25. Schimpf H, Essen H, Boehmsdorff S, Brehm T (2002) MEMPHIS – a fully polarimetric experimental radar. In: IGARSS, Toronto, CA, CD; FR08_853, June 2002Google Scholar
  26. Schimpf H, Wahlen A, Essen H (2004) High range resolution by means of synthetic bandwidth generated by frequency stepped chirps. Electron Lett 39(18):1714–1716Google Scholar
  27. Skolnik M (1980) Introduction to RadarSystems. McGraw-Hill, New York, p 581Google Scholar
  28. TopoSys Topographische Systemdaten GmbH,Obere Stegwiesen 26, 88400 Biberach an der Riß (Germany)Google Scholar
  29. Ulaby FT, Elachi CH (1990) Radar polarimetry for geoscience applications. Artech House, Norwood, MAGoogle Scholar
  30. Weiβ-Wrana K, Jessen W, Kohnle A, Clement D, Höhn DH (January 1995) Atmospheric transmittance measurements of Nd:YAG, iodine and CO2 laser radiation over 8.6 km, and statistical analysis of extinction coefficients. Infrared Phys Technol 36(1):513–528. In: Proceedings of the sixth international conference on infrared physicsCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wikner D (2008) Millimeter-wave propagation measurement through a dust tunnel. Technical Report ARL-TR-4399, Adelphi, 6 August 2008Google Scholar
  32. William JC (1970) Stretch: a time-transformation technique. In: IEEE AES-7, 1970, pp 269–278Google Scholar
  33. Zhou L, Xing M, Sun H (2006) Synthetic bandwidth method integrated with characteristics of SAR. In: International Conference on Radar, Shanghai, pp 1–4, 16–19 October 2006Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department Millimeterwave Radar and High Frequency Sensors (MHS)FGAN- Research Institute for High Frequency Physics and Radar TechniquesWachtbergGermany

Personalised recommendations