Empiricist Heresies in Early Modern Medical Thought

  • Charles T. Wolfe
Part of the Studies in History and Philosophy of Science book series (AUST, volume 25)

Abstract

Vitalism, from its early modern to its Enlightenment forms (from Glisson and Willis to La Caze and Barthez), is notoriously opposed to intervention into the living sphere. Experiment, quantification, measurement are all ‘vivisectionist’, morally suspect and worse, they alter and warp the ‘life’ of the subject. They are good for studying corpses, not living individuals. This much is well known, and it has disqualified vitalist medicine from having a place in standard histories of medicine, until recent, post-Foucauldian maneuvers have sought to change the situation (but for unrelated, contextualist reasons). What is perhaps more suprising is that if we consider the emergence of medical ‘theory’ as a whole, from Harvey through to Locke and Sydenham, is the presence of a sustained anti-experimentalist line of argument, and this from the ‘empiricist’ (not Cartesian or Boerhaavian rationalist) side. It would seem then that ‘empiricks’, medical empiricists and other protagonists of an ‘embodied empiricism’ are not Boylean experimentalists who seek to map out Nature in its transparency, but deliberately archaic, Hippocratic observers of living bodies.

References

  1. D’Alembert, Jean le Rond de. 1756. Expérimental (Philosophie nat.). Encyclopédie VI, 298–301. Paris: Briasson.Google Scholar
  2. Baglivi, Giorgio. 1696/1704. De Praxi Medica, trans. G. Sewell & J.T. Desaguliers, The Practice of Physick. London: A. Bell et al., 2nd edition.Google Scholar
  3. Barsanti, Giulio. 2000. Lamarck: Taxonomy and Theoretical Biology. Asclepio 52(2): 1191–131.Google Scholar
  4. Barthez, Paul-Joseph. 1806. Nouveaux Éléments de la Science de L’Homme, 2 vols, 2nd edition. Paris: Goujon & Brunot.Google Scholar
  5. Bloch, Olivier. 1992. L’Héritage Libertin dans la Pensée des Lumières. Dix-Huitième Siècle 24: 73–82.Google Scholar
  6. Boerhaave, Hermann. 1708/1752. Dr. Boerhaave’s Academical Lectures on the Theory of Physic, Being a Translation of His Institutes and Explanatory Comments, vol. 1 of 6. London: W. Innys (a translation of Institutiones medicae, 1708).Google Scholar
  7. Boyle, Robert. 1999. The Sceptical Chymist (1661). In Works, eds. M. Hunter & E.B. Davis, vol. 2. London: Pickering & Chatto.Google Scholar
  8. Canguilhem, Georges. 1955/1977. La Formation du Concept de Réflexe aux XVII e et XVIII e Siècles, 2nd revised edition. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
  9. Chambers, Ephraim. 1728. Cyclopaedia, or a Universal Dictionary of Arts and Sciences…, 2 vols. London: J. Knapton.Google Scholar
  10. Cook, Harold J. 1990. The New Philosophy and Medicine in Seventeenth-Century England. In Reappraisals of the Scientific Revolution, eds. D. Lindberg and R. Westman, 397–436. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Cook, Harold J. 2007. Matters of Exchange: Commerce, Medicine, and Science in the Dutch Golden Age. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Cranefield, Paul. 1970. On the Origin of the Phrase Nihil Est In Intellectu. Journal of the History of Medicine and the Allied Sciences 25: 77–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dear, Peter. 2006. The Meanings of Experience. In The Cambridge History of Science, vol. 3: Early Modern Science, eds. K. Park & L. Daston, 106–131. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dewhurst, Kenneth. 1958. Locke and Sydenham on the Teaching of Anatomy. Medical History 2: 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dewhurst, Kenneth. 1966. Dr. Thomas Sydenham (1624–1689), his Life and Original Writings. London: Wellcome Historical Medical Library.Google Scholar
  16. Duchesneau, François. 1996. Révolution Scientifique et Problématique de l’Étre Vivant. Revue Philosophique de Louvain 94: 568–598.Google Scholar
  17. Fouquet, Henri. 1765. Sensibilité, Sentiment (Médecine). Encyclopédie XV, 38–52. Paris: Briasson.Google Scholar
  18. French, Roger K. 1990. Sickness and the soul: Stahl, Hoffmann and Sauvages on Pathology. In The Medical Enlightenment of the Eighteenth Century, eds. A. Cunningham & R. French, 88–110. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. French, Roger K. 1994. William Harvey’s Natural Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  20. French, Roger K. 2003. Medicine Before Science. The Business of Medicine from the Middle Ages to the Enlightenment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Froese, Tom. 2009. Hume and the Enactive Approach to Mind. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 8(1): 95–133.Google Scholar
  22. Garrett, Aaron V. 2003. Meaning in Spinoza’s Method. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gaukroger, Stephen. 2005. The Autonomy of Natural Philosophy: From Truth to Impartiality. In Natural Philosophy in the Seventeenth Century, eds. P. Anstey & J. Schuster, 131–164. Dordrecht & New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  24. Grmek, Mirko & Bernabeo, Raffaele. 1997. La machine du corps. In Histoire de la pensée médicale en Occident, ed. M. Grmek, vol. 2: De la Renaissance aux Lumières, 7–36. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.Google Scholar
  25. Hall, T.S. 1968. On Biological Analogs of Newtonian paradigms. Philosophy of Science 35(1): 6–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hankinson, R.J. 1995. The Growth of Medical Empiricism. In Knowledge and the Scholarly Medical Traditions, ed. D. Bates, 60–83. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kaplan, Barbara Beigun. 1993. “Divulging of Useful Truths in Physic”: The Medical Agenda of Robert Boyle. Baltimore: John Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
  28. de La Caze, Louis. 1755. Idée de l’homme physique et moral pour servir d’introduction à un traité de médecine. Paris: Guérin & Delatour.Google Scholar
  29. Lamy, Guillaume. 1996. Discours Anatomiques & Explication Méchanique et Physique des Fonctions de l’Âme Sensitive, ed. Anna Minerbi Belgrado. Oxford: Voltaire Foundation.Google Scholar
  30. Locke, John. 1697. On the Conduct of the Understanding. Online at http://www.ilt.columbia.edu/publications/CESdigital/locke/conduct/toc.html.
  31. Locke, John. 1975. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, ed. P. Nidditch. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Mandeville, Bernard. 1730/1976. A Treatise of the Hypochondriack and Hysterick Diseases, 2nd corrected edition. London: Tonson; reprint, Delmar, N.Y.: Scholars’ Reprints.Google Scholar
  33. Martensen, Robert L. 2004. The Brain Takes Shape: An Early History. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Martin, Julian. 1990. Sauvages’ Nosology. Medical Enlightenment in Montpellier. In The Medical Enlightenment of the Eighteenth Century, eds. A. Cunningham and R.K. French, 111–138. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Ménuret de Chambaud, Jean-Joseph. 1765. Observation (Gram. Physiq. Méd.). Encyclopédie XI, 313–321. Paris: Briasson.Google Scholar
  36. Milton, J.R. 2001. Locke, Medicine and the Mechanical Philosophy. British Journal of the History of Philosophy 9(2): 221–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mothu, Alain. 1993. La mort de Guillaume Lamy. La Lettre clandestine 2. Online at http://www.univ-paris12.fr/scd/lc2-2d.htm.Google Scholar
  38. Norton, David F. 1981. The Myth of British Empiricism. History of European Ideas 1(4): 331–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pentzopoulou-Vallas, Teresa. 1990. Experience and Causal Explanation in Medical Empiricism. In Greek Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science, ed. P. Nicolacopoulos, BSPS, vol. 121, 91–107. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  40. Rey, Roselyne. 1994. Naissance de la Biologie et Redistribution des Savoirs. Revue de Synthèse 1(2): 167–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Salomon-Bayet, Claire. 1978. L’Institution de la Science et l’Expérience du Vivant: Méthode et Expérience à l’Académie Royale des Sciences, 1666–1793. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar
  42. Salomon-Bayet, Claire. 1981. 1802, ‘Biologie’ et Médecine. In Epistemological and Social Problems of the Sciences in the Early Nineteenth Century, eds. H.N. Jahnke & M. Otte, 35–54. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Salter, Alan & Wolfe, Charles T. 2009. Empiricism contra Experiment: Harvey, Locke and the Revisionist View of Experimental Philosophy. Bulletin de la Société d’Histoire et d’Épistémologie des Sciences de la Vie 16(2): 113–140.Google Scholar
  44. Sutton, John. 1995. Body, Mind, and Order: Local Memory and the Control of Mental Representations in Medieval and Renaissance Sciences of Self. In 1543 and All That: Word and Image in the Proto-Scientific Revolution, eds. A. Corones & G. Freeland, 117–150. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  45. Sydenham, Thomas. 1848–1850. Works of Thomas Sydenham, trans. & ed. R.G. Latham, 2 vols. London: Sydenham Society.Google Scholar
  46. Van Speybroeck, Linda, De Waele, Dani & Van De Vijver, Gertrudis. 2002. Theories in Early Embryology. Close Connections Between Epigenesis, Preformationism, and Self-Organization. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 981:7–49.Google Scholar
  47. Waldow, Anik & Wolfe, Charles T. (ms. 2008). Empiricism as a Moral Project in Locke and Hume.Google Scholar
  48. Walzer, Richard and Frede, Michael. 1985. Galen. Three Treatises on the Nature of Science. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
  49. Walmsley, J.C. 2008. Sydenham and the Development of Locke’s Natural Philosophy. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 16(1): 65–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wolfe, Charles T. 2005. The Materialist Denial of Monsters. In Monsters and Philosophy, ed. C.T. Wolfe, 187–204. London: College Publications.Google Scholar
  51. Wolfe, Charles T. 2009a. ‘Cabinet d’Histoire Naturelle’, or: The Interplay of Nature and Artifice in Diderot’s Naturalism. Perspectives on Science 17(1): 58–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wolfe, Charles T., 2009b. A Happiness Fit for Organic Bodies: La Mettrie’s Medical Epicureanism. In Epicureanism in the Enlightenment, eds. N. Leddy & A. Lifschitz, SVEC series, 69–83. Oxford: Voltaire Foundation.Google Scholar
  53. Wolfe, Charles T. & Aury, Mathieu. 2008. Sommes-Nous les Héritiers des Lumières Matérialistes? Phares 8: 11–33 (Université de Laval, Québec), also online at http://www.ulaval.ca/phares/vol8-08/texte02.html.Google Scholar
  54. Wolfe, Charles T. & Terada, Motoichi. 2008. The Animal Economy as Object and Program in Montpellier Vitalism. In Vitalism without Metaphysics? A Reevaluation of Enlightenment Vitalism, Science in Context, ed. C.T. Wolfe, vol. 21(4) special issue, 537–579.Google Scholar
  55. Wolfe, D.E. 1961. Sydenham and Locke on the Limits of Anatomy. Bulletin of the History of Medicine 35: 193–220.Google Scholar
  56. Wright, John P. 2000. Substance vs. Function Dualism in 18th Century Medicine. In Psyche and Soma. Physicians and Metaphysicians on the Mind–Body Problem from Antiquity to the Enlightenment, eds. J.P. Wright & P. Potter, 237–254. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Charles T. Wolfe
    • 1
  1. 1.Unit for History and Philosophy of ScienceUniversity of SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations