Skip to main content

An International Comparison of Invertebrate Biological Control Agent Regulation: What Can Europe Learn?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Regulation of Biological Control Agents

Abstract

Few European countries possess an active regulatory process for the import and release of invertebrate biological control agents (IBCAs). A number of standards, documents and guidelines have been produced over recent years in an attempt to implement a harmonised regulatory system for IBCA introduction and release in Europe. Many industries, biological practitioners and regulators, however, fear that a regulatory system would render the process of approval for IBCA introduction into a country costly and time consuming. Countries such as Australia, New Zealand, Canada and the USA, however, are far ahead in terms of regulating the import and release of exotic IBCAs, each possessing effective legislative and administrative procedures governing the process. In this paper, we revisit two analyses of the regulatory systems in place (i) in Europe and (ii) in Australia, New Zealand, Canada and the USA, and summarise and compare their findings. We then proceed to amalgamate ideas in order to offer pragmatic and effective solutions for a balanced and workable pan-European regulatory system that will minimise the costs imposed on industry without compromising risks to human health or the environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • AGES (2009) Austrian Agency for Health and Food Safety. http://www.ages.at. Accessed 20 January 2009

  • ANBP (2004) Association of natural biocontrol producers: permitted beneficials. http://www.anbp.org/permittedbeneficials.htm. Accessed 20 Jan 2009

  • APHIS (2008) United States Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Permits http://www.aphis.usda.gov/plantl_health/permits/index.shtml. Accessed 20 Jan 2009

  • Bathon H (2005) Nützlingsliste. http://www.bba.bund.de/nn_912578/SharedDocs/08__BI/Publikationen/nuetzlingsliste.html. Accessed 20 Jan 2009

  • Bigler F, Loomans A, van Lenteren J (2005a) Harmonization of the regulation of invertebrate biological control agents in Europe. In: Hoddle MS (ed) Proceedings of the 2nd international symposium on biological control of arthropods, Davos, Switzerland, 12–16 September 2005. FHTET-2005-08, United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Morgantown, WV, USA, pp 692–700

    Google Scholar 

  • Bigler F, Bale JS, Cock MJW, Dreyer H, Greatrex R, Kuhlmann U, Loomans A, van Lenteren JC (2005b) Guidelines on information requirements for import and release of invertebrate biological control agents in European countries. Biocontrol News Inform 26(4):115 N–123 N

    Google Scholar 

  • Bigler F, Babendreier D, Kuhlmann U (eds) (2006) Environmental impact of invertebrates for biological control of arthropods: methods and risk assessment. CABI, Wallingford, 299 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Blum B, Ehlers R, Haukeland-Salinas S, Hokkanen H, Jung K, Kuhlmann U, Menzler-Hokkanen I, Ravensburg W, Strasser H, Warrior P, Wilson M (2003) Biological control agents: safety and regulatory policy. BioControl 48:477–484

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bundesnaturschutgesetz (2002) Gesetz über Naturschutz und Landschaftspflege, $ 41. http://www.buzer.de/gesetz/2122/a30126.htm. Accessed 20 Jan 2009

  • CBD (1992) The convention on biological diversity. http://www.cbd.int/. Accessed 20 Jan 2009

  • CFIA (2008) Canadian food inspection agency: application, procedures, issuance and use of a permit to import under the Plant Protection Act. http://www.inspection.gc.ca/english/plaveg/protect/dir/d-97-04e.shtml. Accessed 20 Jan 2009

  • Coulson JR, Vail PV, Dix ME, Nordlund DA, Kaufmann WC (2000) 110 Years of Biological Control Research and Development in the United States Department of Agriculture (1883–1993). United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service

    Google Scholar 

  • CSL 2008 (2008) Central science laboratory: licensing of non-native biocontrol agents. http://www.csl.gov.uk/nonnativebiocontrol. Accessed 4 Feb 2009

  • DAFF (2007) Australian Government Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry: Protocol for biological control agent applications – import, host-specificity test list and release. http://www.daffa.gov.au/ba/about/plant/protocol-biological. Accessed Jan 2009

  • DEWHA (2009a) Department of the environment, water, heritage and the arts: list of specimens suitable for live import (Live Import List). http://www.environment.gov.au/biodiversity/trade-use/lists/import/pubs/live-import-list.pdf. Accessed 20 Jan 2009

  • DEWHA (2009b) Department of the environment, water, heritage and the arts: amending the list of specimens suitable for live import. http://www.environment.gov.au/biodiversity/trade-use/lists/import/amend/index.html. Accessed 20 Jan 2009

  • De Clerck-Floate RA, Mason PG, Parker DJ, Gillespie DR, Broadbent AB, Boivin G (2006) Guide for the importation and release of arthropod biological control agents in Canada. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada A42-105/2006E, 55 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Delfosse ES (2005) Risk and ethics in biological control. Biol Control 35:319–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EPPO (1997) EPPO/CABI workshop on safety and efficacy of biological control agents in Europe. EPPO Bull 27:1–3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EPPO (1999) Safe use of biological control: first import of exotic biological control agents for research under contained conditions. EPPO Standard PM6/1(1). EPPO Bull 29:271–272. Available at: http://archives.eppo.org/EPPOStandards/biocontrol.htm. Accessed 20 Jan 2009

  • EPPO (2000) Safe use of biological control: Import and release of exotic biological control agents. EPPO Standard PM6/2(1). EPPO Bull 31:33–35. Available at: http://archives.eppo.org/EPPOStandards/biocontrol.htm. Accessed 20 Jan 2009

  • EPPO (2008) List of biological control agents widely used in the EPPO region. EPPO Bull 32:447–461. Available at: http://archives.eppo.org/EPPOStandards/biocontrol.htm. Accessed 20 Jan 2009

    Google Scholar 

  • ERMA New Zealand (2009) Environmental risk management authority New Zealand. http://www.ermanz.govt.nz/. Accessed 20 Jan 2009

  • Greathead DJ (ed.) (1976) A review of biological control in western and southern Europe. Technical Communication No. 7, Commonwealth Institute of Biological Control. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Farnham Royal, UK, 182 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison L, Moeed A, Sheppard A (2005) Regulation of the release of biological control agents of arthropods in New Zealand and Australia. In: Hoddle MS (ed) Proceedings of the second international symposium on biological control of arthropods, Davos, Switzerland, 12–16 September 2005. FHTET-2005-08, United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Morgantown, WV, pp 715–725

    Google Scholar 

  • Het LNV-Loket (2009) Het Landbouw, natuur en voedselkwaliteit-Loket. http://www.hetlnvloket.nl. Accessed 19 Jan 2009

  • Howarth FG (1991) Environmental impacts of classical biological control. Annu Rev Entomol 36:485–509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt E, Kuhlmann U, Sheppard A, Mason PG, Harrison L, Raps A, Dreyer H, Flanders B (2006) A review of the regulations for the import and release of macrobial biological control agents in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, Switzerland and the United States of America. Unpublished report of EU project REBECA [Regulation of Biological Control Agents]

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt EJ, Kuhlmann U, Sheppard A, Qin T-K, Barratt BIP, Harrison L, Mason PG, Parker D, Flanders R, Goolsby J (2008) Review of invertebrate biological control agent regulation in Australia, New Zealand, Canada and the USA: recommendations for a harmonized European system. J Appl Entomol 132:89–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPPC (International Plant Protection Convention) (1996) Code of conduct for the import and release of exotic biological control agents. International Standards for Phytosanitary Measures Publication (ISPM) Publication No. 3, Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) Rome, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • IPPC (2005) Guidelines for the export, shipment, import and release of biological control agents and other beneficial organisms. ISPM Publication No. 3, FAO, Rome, Italy. Available at https://http://www.ippc.int/servlet/CDSServlet?status=ND0xMzM5OSY2PWVuJjMzPSomMzc9a29z. Accessed 20 Jan 2009

  • KEMI (2008) Swedish Chemicals Agency, Försålda kvantiteter av bekämpningsmedel (Sold quantities of pesticides). http://www.kemi.se/templates/Material____3548.aspx. Accessed 20 Jan 2009

  • Kuhlmann U, Toepfer S, Zhang F (2005) Is classical biological control against Western Corn Rootworm in Europe a potential sustainable management strategy?. In: Vidal S, Kuhlmann U, Edwards CR (eds) Western Corn rootworm: ecology and management. CABI, Wallingford, UK, pp 263–284

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Loomans AJM (2007) Regulation of invertebrate biological control agents in Europe: review and recommendations in its pursuit of a harmonised regulatory system. Unpublished report of EU project REBECA [Regulation of Biological Control Agents]. Available at: http://www.rebeca-net.de/downloads/Regulation%20of%20Beneficials%20in%20Europe.pdf. Accessed 20 Jan 2009

  • Loomans AJM, Sütterlin S (2005) Regulation of invertebrate biological control agents: international context and situation in The Netherlands. IOBC/WPRS Bull 28(1):179–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Loomans AJM, van Lenteren JC (2005) Tools for environmental risk assessment of invertebrate biological control agents: a full and quick scan method. In: Hoddle MS (ed) Proceedings of the 2nd international symposium on biological control of arthropods, Davos, Switzerland, 12–16 September 2005. FHTET-2005-08, United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Morgantown, WV, pp 611–619

    Google Scholar 

  • Loomans AJM, Bigler F, Sterk G, Bale JS (2007a) Report from the subgroup for the Development of Guidance and Administration Documents in support of an Application for the Import and Release of Macrobial (Invertebrate) Biological Control Agents. REBECA Work Package 5, Macrobial Biological Control Agents, Appendix 1, Application Form, 10 pp. Available at: http://www.rebeca-net.de/downloads/Brussels%20conference/REBECA%20Application%20form.pdf. Accessed 28 Jan 2009

  • Loomans AJM, Bigler F, Sterk G, Bale JS (2007b) Report from the subgroup for the Development of Guidance and Administration Documents in support of an Application for the Import and Release of Macrobial (Invertebrate) Biological Control Agents. REBECA Work Package 5, Macrobial Biological Control Agents, Appendix 2, Guidance Document, 10 pp. http://www.rebeca-net.de/downloads//Brussels%20conference/REBECA%20Guidance.pdf. Accessed 28 Jan 2009

  • Mason PG, Flanders RG, Arrendondo-Bernal HA (2005) How can legislation facilitate the use of biological control of arthropods in North America?. In: Hoddle MS (ed) Proceedings of the second international symposium on biological control of arthropods, Davos, Switzerland, 12–16 September 2005. FHTET-2005-08, United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Morgantown, WV, pp 701–714

    Google Scholar 

  • Messing RH (2005) Hawaii as a role model for comprehensive U.S. Biocontrol legislation: the best and the worst of it. In: Hoddle MS (ed) Proceedings of the second international symposium on biological control of arthropods, Davos, Switzerland, 12–16 September 2005. FHTET-2005-08, United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Morgantown, WV, pp 686–691

    Google Scholar 

  • NAPPO (2008a) Guidelines for petition for first release of non-indigenous entomophagous biological control agents. Regional Standards for Phytosanitary Measures #12. http://www.nappo.org/Standards/REVIEW/2008/RSPMNo.12-e_20081110.pdf. Accessed 20 Jan 2009

  • NAPPO (2008b) Guidelines for petition for first release of non-indigeous phytophagous biological control agents. Regional Standards for Phytosanitary Measures #7. http://www.nappo.org/Standards/REVIEW/2008/RSPMNo7-e_20081110.pdf. Accessed 20 Jan 2009

  • OECD (2004) Guidance for information requirements for regulation of invertebrates as biological control agents (IBCAs). OECD Environment, Health and Safety Publications. Series Pesticides 21:22 p

    Google Scholar 

  • REBECA (2006) REBECA: regulation of biological control agents. http://www.rebeca-net.de/. Accessed 20 Jan 2009

  • Sheppard AW, Hill R, De Clerck-Floate RA, McClay A, Olckers T, Quimby PC Jr, Zimmermann HG (2003) A global review of risk-benefit-cost for the introduction of classical biological control agents against weeds: a crisis in the making?. Biocontrol News Inform 24:91 N–108 N

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheppard AW, Shaw RH, Sforza R (2006) Top 20 environmental weeds for classical biological control in Europe: a review of opportunities, regulations and other barriers to adoption. Weed Res 46:93–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff D (1996) Impacts of introduced species in the United States. Consequences 2(2):13–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff D, Alexander M (1998) Assessing risks from biological introductions (excluding GMOs) for ecological systems. In: Calow P (ed) Handbook of environmental risk assessment and management. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 147–176

    Google Scholar 

  • USDA (2000) Reviewer’s manual for the technical advisory group for biological control agents of weeds: guidelines for evaluating the safety of candidate biological control agents. Manuals Unit, Plant Protection and Quarantine, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, United States Department of Agriculture. Available at: http://www.aphis.usda.gov/import_export/plants/manuals/ports/downloads/tag.pdf. Accessed 20 Jan 2009

  • Van Driesche RG (2004) Predicting host ranges of parasitoids and predcious insects – what are the issues?. In: Van Driesche RG, Reardon R (eds) Assessing host ranges for parasitoids and predators used for classical biological control: a guide to best practice. United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, FHTET–2004–03, Morgantown, WV

    Google Scholar 

  • van Lenteren JC (1997) Benefits and risks of introducing exotic macro-biological control agents into Europe. Bull OEPP/EPPO Bull 27:15–27

    Google Scholar 

  • van Lenteren JC, Cock MJW, Hoffmeister TS, Sands DPA (2006) Host specificity in arthropod biological control, methods for testing and interpretation of the data. In: Bigler F, Babendreier D, Kuhlmann U (eds) Environmental impact of invertebrates for biological control of arthropods: methods and risk assessment. CABI, Wallingford, pp 38–63

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Waage J (1997) Global developments in biological control and the implications for Europe. EPPO Bull 27:5–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waage JK (2001) Indirect ecological effects in biological control: the challenge and the opportunity. In: Wajnberg E, Scott JK, Quimby PC (eds) Evaluating indirect ecological effects of biological control. CABI, Wallingford, pp 1–12

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wang et al (2003) Vurdering af muligheder for forebyggelse og alternative bekæmpelse i væksthusproducerede planter (prydplanter og væksthusgrønsager)http://www2.mst.dk/udgiv/publikationer/2003/87-7972-898-7/pdf/87-7972-899-5.pdf. Accessed Jan 2009

  • Williamson M (1996) Biological invasions. Chapman & Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ulrich Kuhlmann .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Netherlands

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hunt, E.J., Loomans, A.J., Kuhlmann, U. (2011). An International Comparison of Invertebrate Biological Control Agent Regulation: What Can Europe Learn?. In: Ehlers, RU. (eds) Regulation of Biological Control Agents. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3664-3_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics