Towards Enterprise Integration Performance Assessment based on Category Theory

Conference paper


A major difference between what we refer to as a “well-developed” science, such as civil engineering, and sciences which are less so, like enterprise engineering, is the degree to which nonfunctional requirements, such as performance, are integrated into the design and development process, and satisfaction of those requirements is controlled by theoretically valid measurement procedures. This paper introduces the preliminary results, which are aimed at developing a concise formal framework for enterprise performance modeling, measurement, and control during enterprise integration activities. The novelty of this research consists in employing the mathematical category theory for modeling purposes, an approach that is broad enough to formally capture heterogeneous (structural, functional and nonfunctional) requirements, by, for example, using the constructs from the graphical categorical formal language.


Performance modeling performance measurement enterprise integration category theory 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    Kochhar, A., Zhang, Y. A framework for performance measurement in virtual enterprises. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Performance Measurement, 6–7 June, Hanover, pp. 2-11 (2002)Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Krantz, D. H., Luce, R. D., Suppes, P., Tversky, A.. Foundations of Measurement – Additive and Polynomial Representations, vol. 1. Academic Press, New York (1971)Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Narens, L. Abstract Measurement Theory. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (1985)MATHGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Johnson, H. T., Kaplan, R. S. Relevance Lost: The Rise and Fall of Management Accounting, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA (1987)Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    McNair, C. J., Masconi, W. Measuring performance in advanced manufacturing environment. Management Accounting, July, pp. 28-31 (1987)Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Kaplan, R. S. Measures for Manufacturing Excellence. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA (1990)Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Druker, P. E. The emerging theory of manufacturing. Harvard Business Review, May/June, pp. 94-102 (1990)Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Russell, R. The role of performance measurement in manufacturing excellence. In BPICS Conference, Birmingham (1992)Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Cross, K. F., Lynch, R. L. The SMART way to define and sustain success. National Productivity Review, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 23-33 (1988/89)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Dixon, J. R., Nanni, A. J., Vollmann, T. E. The New Performance Challenge – Measuring Operations for World-class Competition, Dow Jones-Irwin, Homewood, IL (1990)Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Kaplan, R. S., Norton, D. P. The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA (1996)Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    EFQM. Self-assessment Guidelines for Companies, European Foundation for Quality Management, Brussels (1998)Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Beer, S. Diagnosing the System for Organizations, Wiley, Chichester (1985)Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Neely, A., Mills, J., Gregory, M., Richards, H., Platts, K., Bourne, M. Getting the Measure of your Business. University of Cambridge, Cambridge (1996)Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    Neely, A., Adams, C. The performance prism perspective. Journal of Cost Management, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 7-15 (2001)Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMISM), Version 1.1, Software Engineering Institute, Pittsburgh, March 2002, CMMI-SE/SW/IPPD/SS, V1.1Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    Card, D. Integrating Practical Software Measurement and the Balanced Scorecard. In Proceedings of COMPSAC’03 (2003)Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    Gunasekaran, A., Patel, C., Tirtiroglu, E. Performance measures and metrics in a supply chain environment. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, vol. 21, no.1/2, pp. 71-87 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
  20. [20]
    Beamon, M. Measuring supply chain performance. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, vol. 19, no..3, pp. 275-92 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    Fenton, N. E., Pfleeger, S. L., Software Metrics: A Rigorous and Practical Approach 2/e, PWS Publishing Company (1998)Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    Barr, M., Wells, C. Category Theory for Computing Science, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ (1990)MATHGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    Fiadeiro, J. Categories for Software Engineering, Springer Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg (2005)MATHGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    Whitmire, S. Object Oriented Design Measurement, Whiley Computer Publishing, New York, NY (1997)Google Scholar
  25. [25]
    Vernadat, F. B. Enterprise modeling and integration: Principles and applications, London, Chapman & Hall (1996).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Concordia UniversityMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations