E-learning Tools in Naval Engineering

Conference paper

Abstract

The designing tools for an e-learning system in the naval engineering are the argument of this paper. The field particularity, like variety and size of ship structures and piping have defined the methods and techniques for developing the specific components of the e-learning system, based mainly on the generation of animated virtual models. Therefore the creation of the necessary tools for a correct 3D perception of the ship and also the tools for self assessment and assessment are the main components for the present e-learning field. The efficient use of the e-learning tools is provided by the management of a unitary platform as an integrated e-learning system.

Testing and validation of the e-learning tools has been an important phase in implementing the educational system in the Naval Architecture Faculty of Galati.

Keywords

e-learning tools naval engineering typical problems simulation testing validation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Beard, C. (2007) Experiential learning: The Development of a Framework for Effective Practice. Unpublished thesis, (PhD). Sheffield Hallam University.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Beard, C., Clegg, S. and Smith, K. (2007) Acknowledging the Affective in Higher Education. British Educational Research Journal,33(2), April, 235-252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Beard, C. and McCarter, R. (2005) Mastering University. [CD-ROM]. Aldershot: Gower.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Beard, C. M. and Wilson, J. P. (2002) The Power of Experiential Learning: A Handbook for Educators and Trainers. London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Beard, C. and Wilson, J. P. (2005) Ingredients for Effective Experiential Learning: the learning combination lock. In: P. Hartley et al.(eds) Enhancing Teaching in Higher Education: New Approaches for Improving Student Learning. York: Routledge/Higher Education Academy, 3-15.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Beard, C. and Wilson, J.P. (2006) Experiential Learning: A Best Practice Handbook for Educators and Trainers. London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Clark, R. C. and Mayer, R. E. (2003) E-Learning and the Science of Instruction: Proven Guidelines for Consumers and Designers of Multi-media Learning. San Francisco CA: Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Collis, B. and Moonen, J. (2001) Flexible Learning in a Digital World: Experiences and xpectations. London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Beard, Wilson and McCarter (2007) Towards a Theory of e-Learning: Experiential e-Learning, Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport and Tourism Education, Vol. 6, No. 2., www.heacademy.ac.uk/hlst/resources/johlste
  10. [10]
    Fenwick, T. J. (2003) Learning Through Experience: Troubling Orthodoxies and Intersecting Questions. Malabar, Florida: Krieger Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Hede, A. (2002) An Integrated Model of Multimedia Effects on Learning. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 11 (2), 177-191. Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    McCarter, R. (2005) Analysing the pedagogical value of the synergy between video and text in a digital media application.Unpublished Masters Dissertation, Sheffield Hallam University.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Moreno, R., Mayer, R. E., Spires, H. A. and Lester, J. C. (2001) The Case for Social Agency in Computer-Based Teaching: do students learn more deeply when they interact with animated pedagogical agents? Cognition and Instruction,19(2), 177-213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Mortiboys, A. (2002) The Emotionally Intelligent Lecturer. Birmingham: SEDA Publications.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    Nichols, M. (2003) A Theory for ELearning. Educational Technology and Society,6(2), 1-10.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Payne, P. (2002) On the Construction, Deconstruction and Reconstruction of Experience in Critical Outdoor Education. Australian Journal of Outdoor Education,6(2), 4-21.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    Ravenscroft, A. (2001) Designing ELearning Interactions in the 21stCentury: revisiting and rethinking the role of theory. European Journal of Education,36(2), 133-156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    Robertson, I. (2000) Mind Sculpture: Your Brain’s Untapped Potential. London: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    Schoenmaker, J. and Stanshev, I. (2000) Visualisation, Principles and Tools for Instructional Visualisation. University of Twente: Andersen Consulting-ECC.Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    Sherry, L. (2003) Issues in Distance Learning. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications,1(4), 337-365.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Naval Architecture Faculty „Dunarea de Jos” UniversityGalatiRomania

Personalised recommendations