Advertisement

Active-based Key-skills Learning in Engineering Curriculum to Improve Student Engagement

  • Cecilia K.Y. Chan
  • Mike Murphy
Conference paper

Abstract

Employer groups have been extensively lobbied the government to introduce key skills development strategy for higher education to produce well-rounded graduates. This is particularly true in professional disciplines such as engineering where discipline specific knowledge rapidly becomes obsolete. Key-skills is the key to success; they help one to excel in the workplace and their importance cannot be denied in this information age. However, it is difficult to teach and assess key-skills as students are not familiar with the importance and relevance of key-skills and lecturers are not familiar how to embed key-skills into the traditional core discipline teaching. In this paper, we will discuss the changes in an electrical engineering programme in Ireland - how curriculum reform has given an opportunity to embed key-skills into the programme. We will also discuss the research investigated on how to engage students to key-skills learning and several development strategies used to demonstrate key-skills in an engineering curriculum.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Expert Group on Future Skills Needs,. “Fourth Report of the Expert Group on Future Skills Needs,” EGFSN, 2003Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Fianna Fáil, “Manifesto – Now, the Next Steps,” Manifesto, 2007.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Council of the European Union “Education Council to the European Council on the Concrete Future Objectives of Education and Training Systems,” Report, 2001 http://register.consilium.eu.int/pdf/en/01/st05/05980en1.pdf (accessed July 2006)
  4. [4]
    Staddon. L, “When the new meets the old; the need to re-conceive higher education”, Exchange Journal, HEA, 2002, pp.28Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    National Academy of Engineering, “The engineer of 2020: Visions of engineering in the new century,” The National Academies Press, Washington DC, 2004Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Pellegrino, J.W, “Rethinking and redesigning curriculum, instruction and assessment: What contemporary research and theory suggest.” National Center on Education and the Economy for the New Commission on the Skills of the American Workforce, 2006 http://www.skillscommission.org/pdf/commissioned_papers/Rethinking%20and%20Redesigning.pdf (accessed June, 2008)
  7. [7]
    Engineers Ireland, Accreditation Criteria for Engineering Education Programmes, Engineers Ireland, March 2007Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Chan. C, “Changing the saying -“Engineers work better with machines than people” by enhancing key-skills with engineering in the most relevant ways”, DIT Learning and Teaching Showcase, 2005Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Chan, C. and Coyle, E, “Natural, Creative, Brainstorming “Scrapyard Challenge” Design Project”, Proceedings of 33 International Symposium IGIP/IEEE/ASEE, Fribourg, Switzerland, Oct 2004.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cecilia K.Y. Chan
    • 1
  • Mike Murphy
    • 2
  1. 1.The University of Hong Kong Centre for the Advancement of University TeachingHong KongChina
  2. 2.Faculty of EngineeringDublin Institute of TechnologyDublinIreland

Personalised recommendations