Abstract
We have summarized some of the recent results, including studies for bulk, confined and interfacial water. By analyzing a cell model within a mean field approximation and with Monte Carlo simulations, we have showed that all the scenarios proposed for water's P-T phase diagram may be viewed as special cases of a more general scheme. In particular, our study shows that it is the relationship between H bond strength and H bond cooperativity that governs which scenario is valid. The investigation of the properties of metastable liquid water under pressure could provide essential information that could allow us to understand the mechanisms ruling the anomalous behavior of water. This understanding could, ultimately, lead us to the explanation of the reasons why water is such an essential liquid for life.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Zheligovskaya, E. A., and Malenkov, G. G. (2006) Russ. Chem. Rev. 75, 57
Debenedetti, P. G., (2003) J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 15, R1669
Debenedetti, P. G. and Stanley, H. E. (2003) The Physics of Supercooled and Glassy Water, Physics Today 56, 40
Angell, C. A. (1982) in: Water: A Comprehensive Treatise vol. 7, edited by F. Franks (Plenum, NewYork)
Ball, P. (2008) Chem. Rev. 108, 74
Franzese, G., and Rubi, eds. M. (2008) Aspects of Physical Biology: Biological Water, Protein Solutions, Transport and Replication, (Springer, Berlin)
Anisimov, M. A., Sengers, J. V., and Levelt-Sengers, J. M. H. (2004) in Aqueous System at Elevated Temperatures and Pressures: Physical Chemistry in Water, Stream and Hydrothmaler Solutions, edited by D.A. Palmer, R. Fernandez-Prini, A. H. Harvey (Elsevier, Amsterdam)
Granick and S., and Bae, S. C. (2008) Science 322, 1477
Speedy, R. J. (1982) J. Phys. Chem. 86, 3002
Sastry, S., Debenedetti, P. G., Sciortino, F., and Stanley, H. E. (1996) Phys. Rev. E 53, 6144
Poole, P. H., Sciortino, F., Essmann, U., and Stanley, H. E. (1992) Nature 360, 324
Poole, P. H., Sciortino, F., Grande, T., Stanley, H. E., and Angell, C. A. (1994) Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 1632
Franzese, G., Marques, M., and Stanley, H. E. (2003) Phys. Rev. E. 67, 011103
Tanaka, H. (1996) Nature 380, 328
Angell, C. A. (2008) Science 319, 582
Faraone, A., Liu, L., Mou, C. Y., Yen, C. W., and Chen, S. H. (2004) J. Chem. Phys. 121, 10843
Liu, L., Chen, S. H., Faraone, A., Yen, C. W., and Mou, C. Y. (2005) Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 117802
Mallamace, F., Broccio, M., Corsaro, C., Faraone, A., Wanderlingh, U., Liu, L., Mou, C. Y., and Chen, S. H. (2006) J. Chem. Phys. 124, 161102
Chen, S.-H., Liu, L., Fratini, E., Baglioni, P., Faraone, A., and Mamontov, E. (2006) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 9012
Mamontov, E. (2005) J. Chem. Phys. 123, 171101
Jansson, H., Howells, W. S., and Swenson, J. (2006) J. Phys. Chem. B 110, 13786
Chen, S.-H. et al., (2006) J. Chem. Phys. 125, 171103
Chu, X., Fratini, E., Baglioni, P., Faraone, A., and Chen, S.-H. (2008) Phys. Rev. E 77, 011908
Franzese, G., Stokely, K., Chu, X.-Q., Kumar, P., Mazza, M. G., Chen. S.-H., and Stanley, H. E. (2008) J. Phys.: Cond. Matt. 20, 494210
Stanley, H. E., Kumar, P., Franzese, G., Xu, L. M., Yan, Z. Y., Mazza, M.G., Chen, S.-H., Mallamace, F., Buldyrev, S. V. (2008) “Liquid polyamorphism: Some unsolved puzzles of water in bulk, nano-confined, and biological environments”, in Complex Systems, M. Tokuyama, I. Oppenheim, H. Nishiyama, H, eds. AIP Conference Proceedings 982, 251
Xu, L., Kumar, P., Buldyrev, S. V., Chen, S.-H., Poole, P. H., Sciortino, F., and Stanley, H. E. (2005) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 102, 16558
Kumar, P., Yan, Z., Xu, L., Mazza, M. G., Buldyrev, S. V., Chen. S.-H., Sastry, S., and Stanley, H. E. (2006) Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 177802
Stanley, H. E., Buldyrev, S. V., Franzese, G., Giovambattista, N. F., Starr, W. (2005) Phil. Trans. Royal Soc. 363, 509; Kumar, P., Franzese, G., Buldyrev, S. V., and Stanley, H. E. (2006) Phys. Rev. E 73, 041505
Kumar, P., Franzese, G., and Stanley, H. E. (2008) Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 105701
Franzese, G., and Stanley, H. E. (2002) J. Phys. Cond. Matter 14, 2201 (2002); Physica A 314, 508
Stokely, K., Mazza, M. G., Stanley, H. E., and Franzese, G. (2008) arXiv: 0805.3468v3
Kumar, P., Franzese, G., and Stanley, H. E. (2008) J. Phys.: Cond. Matt. 20, 244114
Pendas, A. M., Blanco, M. A., and Francisco, E. (2006) J. Chem. Phys. 125, 184112
Isaacs, E. D., Shukla, A., Platzman, P. M., Hamann, D. R., Barbiellini, B., and Tulk, C. A. (2000) J. Phys. Chem. Solids 61, 403
Ricci, M. A., Bruni, F., Giuliani, A. (2009) Similarities between confined and supercooled water, to appear on Faraday Discussion, in press
Ohno, K., Okimura, M., Akai, N., and Katsumoto, Y. (2005) Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 7, 3005
Cruzan, J. D., Braly, L. B., Liu, K., Brown, M. G., Loeser, J. G., and Saykally, R. J. (1996) Science 271, 59
Schmidt, D. A., and Miki, K. (2007) J. Phys. Chem. A 111, 10119
Chaplin, M. (2007) “Water's Hydrogen Bond Strength”, cond-mat/ 0706.1355
Franzese, G., and Stanley, H. E. (2007) J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 19, 205126
Coniglio, A., and Peruggi, F. (1982) J. Phys. A 15, 1873
Cataudella, V., Franzese, G., Nicodemi, M., Scala, A., and Coniglio, A. (1996) Phys. Rev. E 54, 175; Franzese, G. (1996) J. Phys. A 297367
Wolff, U. (1989) Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 361
The results of [41, 42] guarantee that the cluster algorithm described here satisfies the detailedbalance and is ergodic. Therefore, it is a valid Monte Carlo dynamics
Mazza M.G. et al. (2006) Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 057803; N. Giovambattista et al., (2004) J. Phys. Chem. B 1086655; M.G. Mazza et al. (2007) Phys. Rev. E 76, 031203
Oleinikova, A., Brovchenko, I., (2006) J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 18, S2247
We fit the boundary of the CPF scenario with the functional form Jσ= a+bJ, with a =0.30 ±0.01 and b = 0.36 ±0.01
Maruyama, S., Wakabayashi, K., and Oguni, M. (2004) AIP Conf. Proc. Proc. 708, 675
Oguni, M., Maruyama, S., Wakabayashi, K., and Nagoe, A. (2007) Chem. Asian 2, 514
Oguni, M., Kanke, Y., and Namba, S. (2008) AIP Conference Proceedings 982, 34
Mazza, M. G., Stokely, K., Stanley, H. E., and Franzese, G. (2008) arXiv:0810.4688
Mallamace, F. (2008) preprint
Bruni, F. (2008) private communication
Our resolution in T does not allow us to observe the expected divergence of C P upon approaching the critical point.
Marques, M. I. (2007) Phys. Rev. E 76, 021503
The difference of our results with those in [55], i.e. the presence of two maxima also at P < PC and T > TC is due to the different choice of parameters for the model: here Jσ < J < ϵ as in [13, 30, 31], while in [55] is ϵ < Jσ < J which gives rise to a different phase diagram.
The non-zero value of CP at low T is reminiscent of the appearance of reproduce the splitting of the maxima seen in MC at P⟫ PCthe broad maximum. However the MF approximation is not able to
In the range of T of interest here the contribution to H of the UW term is negligible
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Stokely, K., Mazza, M.G., Stanley, H.E., Franzese, G. (2010). Metastable Water Under Pressure. In: Rzoska, S., Drozd-Rzoska, A., Mazur, V. (eds) Metastable Systems under Pressure. NATO Science for Peace and Security Series A: Chemistry and Biology. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3408-3_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3408-3_14
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-3406-9
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-3408-3
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)