Abstract
Conceptions and implementation of SFM are based on different theoretical approaches of ‘conservation’. They imply various dimensions of development and a broad range of interests, perspectives, values, and philosophies of the individuals and collectives affected and involved (political, religious, economic, social, theoretical, etc.). Globalisation and global change makes this already complex relationship even more intricate. Down-to-earth approaches to SFM primarily have to describe their underlying theoretical assumptions, ethical values, and operational and political goals. Otherwise, they run the risk of being sound in theory but not applicable in practise.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Attfield R (1999) The ethics of the global environment. Edinburgh, pp 232
Bierbaum R, Holdren JP, MacCracken M, Moss RH, Raven PH, Schellnhuber HJ (2007) Confronting climate change: Avoiding the unmanageable and managing the unavoidable. SIGMA XI, Washington DC.
Burger D (2005) Requirements for sustainable forest management following the paradigm of sustainable development. In: Burger, Hess, Lang (eds) Forest certification: an innovative instrument in the service of sustainable development? Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ), Eschborn, pp 61–76
Carlowitz von HC (1713) Sylvicultura oeconomica, oder hausswirtliche Nachricht und Naturmässige Anweisung zur wilden Baum-Zucht.
Ehrenfeld D (1978) The arrogance of humanism. Oxford, New York, pp 286
Gatzweiler F (2004) The changing nature of economic value. Indigenous forest garden values in Kalimantatan, Aachen, Indonesia, pp 249
Habermas J (1988) Aus Katastrophen lernen? In: Jürgen Habermas: Die postnationale Konstellation. Politische Essays. Frankfurt am Main, pp 65–90
IPCC (2007) Climate Change 2007 – Synthesis Report. Summary for Policy Makers. http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar4/syr/ar4_syr_spm_OnlinePDF.pdf. Accessed March 2008
Norton BG (1987) Why preserve natural variety? Princeton (NY) Biodiv Ref QH75 .N67
Puettmann KJ, Messier CC, Coates KD (2008) Critique of silviculture: managing for complexity. Island Press, Washington, DC, p 188
Schanz H (1996) Sustainable forest management – on the meanings and functions of a central term in forestry. Voluntary Paper for XI. World Forest Congress, Antalya 1997
Senghaas D (2002) Kulturelle Globalisierung – ihre Kontexte, ihre Varianten. In: Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung (Hrsg.). Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte B 12. 6–9
Thompson M, Ellis R, Wildavsky A (1990) Cultural theory. Boulder, SanFrancisco, Oxford, pp 1–18, 25–38
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ihne, H., Spathelf, P. (2009). Introduction: Some Basic Remarks on Sustainable Forest Management, Environment and Global Ethics. In: Spathelf, P. (eds) Sustainable Forest Management in a Changing World. Managing Forest Ecosystems, vol 19. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3301-7_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3301-7_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-3300-0
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-3301-7
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)