Skip to main content

Collecting, Processing and Storage of Plant Materials for Nutritional Analysis

  • 512 Accesses

Abstract

A solid sampling strategy for plant material is the first step in screening forages for nutritional analysis and extra-nutritional attributes to determine if potential forage species, with good adaptation and biomass production are suitable for use as livestock feeds. Since the morphological phenotype is rarely a good indicator of nutritional traits, nutritional analysis is essential when selecting plants as feeds. It is not possible to select forages based solely on biomass production without taking into account the nutritional and anti-nutritional attributes. Some species with leafy and high productivity may contain plant secondary metabolites that may be toxic and make them unsuitable for use as feeds. A good example of this is Leucaena, which is fast growing and yields up to 15 tons/ha of forage dry matter per year, but because of the mimosine in the leaves could initially only be fed in quantities up to 30% of the diet without causing toxicity symptoms. This was not apparent from looking at the plant and emphasizes the need to do a thorough nutritional evaluation before introducing new species as livestock feeds. However, identification of mimosine degrading rumen microbes now allows livestock to consume larger quantities [5] and makes this both a productive and nutritionally useful forage plant in many tropical livestock systems.

Keywords

  • Leaf Material
  • Proximate Analysis
  • Plant Secondary Metabolite
  • Nutritional Attribute
  • Material Require

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
EUR   29.95
Price includes VAT (Netherlands)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR   117.69
Price includes VAT (Netherlands)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
EUR   163.49
Price includes VAT (Netherlands)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
EUR   163.49
Price includes VAT (Netherlands)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bray, R.A. 1983. Strategies for gene maintenance, pp. 157–168. In J.G. McIvor, and R.A. Bray (eds.), Genetic Resources of Forage Plants. CSIRO, Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dzowela, B.H., L. Hove, and P.L. Mafongoya. 1995. Effect of drying method on chemical composition and in vitro digestibility of multipurpose tree and shrub fodders. Trop. Grassl. 29:263–269.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Harborne, J.B., and R.J. Grayer. 1994. Flavonoids and insects, pp. 589–618. In J.B. Harborne (ed.), The Flavonoids: Advances in Research Since 1986. Chapman and Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Heering H., J.D. Reed, and J. Hanson. 1996. Differences in Sesbania sesban accessions in relation to their phenolic concentration and HPLC fingerprints. J. Sci. Food Agric. 71(1):92–98.

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Jones, R.J. 1985. Leucaena toxicity and the ruminal degradation of mimosine, pp. 111–119. In A.A. Seawright, M.P. Hegarty, L.F. James, and R.F. Keeler (eds.), Plant Toxicology – Proceedings of the Australia–USA Poisonous Plants Symposium. Queensland Department of Primary Industry, Brisbane.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Julkunen-Tiitto, R., and S. Sorsa. 2001. Testing the effects of drying methods on willow flavonoids, tannins, and salicylates. J. Chem. Ecol. 27 (4):779–789.

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lyons, R.K., R. Machen, and T.D.A. Forbes. 1996. Why range forage quality changes. Texas Agricultural Extension Service Bulletin B–6036.

    Google Scholar 

  8. OECD. 1993. Safety evaluation of foods derived by modern biotechnology – concepts and principles, p. 74. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, France.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Papachristou, T.G., and A.S. Nastis. 1994. Changes in chemical composition and in vitro digestibility of oesophageal fistula and hand plucked forage samples due to drying method and stage of maturity, Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 46:87–95.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  10. Reed, J.D., G. Gebremariam, C. Robinson, J. Hanson, A. Odenyo, and P.M. Treichel. 2001. Acetyl diamino butanoic acid (ADAB), a potential lathyrogenic amino acid in leaves of Acacia angustissima. J. Sci. Food Agric. 81:1481–1486.

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Stewart, J.L., F. Mould, and I. Muller-Harvey. 2000. The effect of drying treatment on the fodder quality and tannin content of two provenances of Calliandra calothyrsus Meissner. J. Sci. Food Agric. 80:1461–1468.

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jean Hanson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 International Atomic Energy Agency

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hanson, J., Fernandez-Rivera, S. (2010). Collecting, Processing and Storage of Plant Materials for Nutritional Analysis. In: Vercoe, P., Makkar, H., Schlink, A. (eds) In vitro screening of plant resources for extra-nutritional attributes in ruminants: nuclear and related methodologies. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3297-3_2

Download citation