Advertisement

Educational Formalism and the Language of Goals in American Education, Educational Reform, and Educational History

  • David F. LabareeEmail author
Chapter
  • 798 Downloads
Part of the Educational Research book series (EDRE, volume 4)

Abstract

Schools are better at expressing social goals than at operationalizing those goals in a manner that might actually realize them. School reform efforts are better at changing the rhetorical commitment of schools to particular educational goals than at bringing the teaching and learning in schools in line with these goals. And historical studies of education are better at identifying the evolving language of educational goals than at detailing the impact of these goals on the core pedagogical relation between teacher and student. Thus the language of goals dominates education, educational reform, and historical research on education. In this paper, I explore the central elements of education’s language fetish, the historical and sociological roots of this condition, and its consequences for education and society. The focus will be on American education; but much of the argument resonates with education in other settings, since it tries to tell a story about the social role that education is asked to play in modern liberal democracies.

Keywords

Social Mobility Educational Reform Liberal Democracy Social Goal Educational Goal 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Bidwell, C. E. (1965). The school as a formal organization. In J. M. March (Ed.), Handbook of organizations (pp. 972–1018). Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
  2. Blossfeld, H. P., & Shavit, Y. (2000). Persisting barriers: Changes in educational opportunities. In R. Arum & I. Beattie (Eds.), The structure of schooling (pp. 245–259). Mountain View: Mayfield.Google Scholar
  3. Boudon, R. (1986). Education, mobility, and sociological theory. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 261–274). New York: Greenwood.Google Scholar
  4. Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka. (1954). 347 U.S. 483.Google Scholar
  5. Chubb, J. E., & Moe, T. M. (1990). Politics, markets, and America’s schools. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  6. Cohen, D. K. (1988). Teaching practice: Plus ça change. In P. W. Jackson (Ed.), Contributing to educational change: Perspectives on research and practice (pp. 27–84). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.Google Scholar
  7. Commission on the Reorganization of Secondary Education. (1918). Cardinal principles of secondary education. Washington, DC: National Education Association.Google Scholar
  8. Cremin, L. A. (Ed.). (1957). The republic and the school: Horace Mann on the education of free men. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  9. Cremin, L. A. (1961). The transformation of the school: Progressivism in American education, 1976–1957. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  10. Cuban, L. (1993). How teachers taught: Constancy and change in American classrooms, 1890–1980 (2nd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  11. Cummings, W. (1997). Patterns of modern education. In W. Cummings & N. McGinn (Eds.), International handbook of education and development: Preparing schools, students, and nations for the twenty-first century (pp. 63–85). New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  12. Durkheim, E. (1938/1969). The evolution of educational thought: Lectures on the formation and development of secondary education in France. Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  13. Fuller, H. (2002). Full court press. Education Next, 2(3; Fall), 88. http://educationnext.org/fullcourtpress/accessed 9-21-09.
  14. Hanushek, E., & Kimko, D. (2000, December). Schooling, labor force quality, and the growth of nations. American Economic Review, 90, 1184–1208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hochschild, A. (1983). The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  16. Labaree, D.F. (1988). The making of an American high school: The credentials market and the Central High School of Philadelphia, 1838–1920. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Labaree, D. F. (1997, Spring). Public good, private goods: The American struggle over educational goals. American Educational Research Journal, 34(1), 39–81.Google Scholar
  18. Labaree, D. F. (2004). The trouble with ed schools. New Haven: Yake University press.Google Scholar
  19. Labaree, D. F. (2007). Citizens and consumers: Changing visions of virtue and opportunity in U.S. education in the 19th and 20th centuries. Paper presented at conference on “Republican and Non-Republican Imaginations,” University of Applied Sciences, Zurich.Google Scholar
  20. Labaree, D. F. (2008). Limits on the impact of educational reform: The case of progressivism and U.S. Schools, 1900–1950. In C. Crotti & F. Osterwalder (Eds.), Das Jahrhundert der Schulreformen: Internationale und nationale Perspektiven, 1900–1950 (pp. 105–133). Bern: Haupt.Google Scholar
  21. Lagemann, E. C. (1989). The plural worlds of educational research. History of Education Quarterly, 29(2), 185–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lortie, D. C. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. Chicago: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  23. Meyer, J. W. (1977). The effects of education as an institution. American Journal of Sociology, 83(1), 55–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1983). The structure of educational organizations. In J. W. Meyer & W. R. Scott (Eds.), Organizational environments: Ritual and rationality (pp. 71–97). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  26. Meyer, J. W., Tyack, D., Nagel, J., & Gordon, A. (1979). Public education as nation-building in America: Enrollments and bureaucratization in the American states, 1870–1930, American Journal of Sociology, 85(3), 591–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.Google Scholar
  28. No Child Left Behind Act. (2002). Public Law 107–110.Google Scholar
  29. Ramirez, F. O. (1997). The nation-state, citizenship, and educational change: Institutionalization and globalization. In W. Cummings & N. McGinn (Eds.), International handbook of education and development: Preparing schools, students, and nations for the twenty-first century (pp. 47–62). New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  30. Ramirez, F. O., & Boli, J. (1987). The political construction of mass schooling: European origins and worldwide institutionalization. Sociology of Education, 60(1), 2–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ramirez, F. O., Luo, X., Schofer, E., & Meyer, J. W. (2006). Student achievement and national economic growth. American Journal of Education, 113, 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ravitch, D. (2000). Left back: A century of failed school reforms. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  33. Rubinson, R., & Browne, I. (1996). Education and the economy. In N. Smelser & R. Swedborg (Eds.), The handbook of economic sociology (pp. 581–599). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Schultz, T. W. (2000/1961). Investment in human capital. In R. Arum & I. Beattie (Eds.), The structure of schooling (pp. 46–55). Mountain View: Mayfield Publishing.Google Scholar
  35. Tyack, D. (1996). Forming the national character. Harvard Education Review, 36, 29–41.Google Scholar
  36. Tyack, D., & Cuban, L. (1995) Tinkering toward Utopia: Reflections on a century of public school reform. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Waller, W. (1932/1965). The sociology of teaching. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Weick, K. (1976). Educational organizations as loosely-coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zilversmit, A. (1993). Changing schools: Progressive education theory and practice, 1930–1960. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of EducationStanford UniversityStanfordUSA

Personalised recommendations