Advertisement

(Re)Presenting the Street: Video and Visual Culture in Planning

Chapter
Part of the Urban and Landscape Perspectives book series (URBANLAND, volume 7)

Abstract

The practice of city planning cannot be separated from its visual culture: the images produced by urban professionals to make proposals, advance arguments, and assert expertise. By way of prologue, consider a drawing created by Jules Guérin for the 1909 Plan of Chicago (Fig. 5.1). In the blink of an eye, the picture embodies the plan. Reproduced on the paperback cover of Peter Hall’s Cities of Tomorrow (1988) for nearly every recent student of city planning to see, the image of a new Civic Center for Chicago has come to stand for many of the ideals of city planning: bold physical proposals, a progressive role for government, the enhancement of the public realm.

Keywords

Geographic Information System Social Space City Planning Public Realm City Planner 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The University of California Transportation Center at Berkeley sponsored the research for this project, and I thank Betty Deakin for her support of video as a form of planning research and practice. I am indebted to Leonie Sandercock and Giovanni Attili for their incisive editorial observations and encouragement to pursue a self-reflexive voice.

References

  1. Barnouw, E. (1993). Documentary: A history of the non-fiction film. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Becker, H. S. (2007). Telling about society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  3. Borchert, J. (1980). Alley life in Washington: Family, community, religion, and folklife in the City, 1850–1970. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  4. Campanella, T. J. (2001). Cities from the Sky: An aerial portrait of America. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.Google Scholar
  5. Cherry, C. R., Deakin, E., Higgins, N., & Huey, S. B. (2006). Systems-level approach to sustainable urban arterial revitalization: Case study of San Pablo avenue. Transportation record, Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1977. Google Scholar
  6. Duneier, M. (1999). Sidewalk. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.Google Scholar
  7. Eckstein, B., & Throgmorton, A. (Eds.). (2003). Story and sustainability: Planning, practice, and possibility for American cities. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  8. Forester, J. (1989). Planning in the face of power. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  9. Goffman, E. (1966). Behavior in public places: Notes on the social organization of gatherings. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  10. Hall, P. (1988). Cities of tomorrow: An intellectual history of urban planning and design in the twentieth century. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  11. Innes, J. (1995). Planning theory’s emerging paradigm: Communicative action and interactive practice. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 14(3), 183–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jacobs, J. (1961). The death and life of great American cities. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  13. Kayden, J. S. (2000). Privately owned public space: The New York city experience. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
  14. Kracauer, S. (1960) Theory of film: The redemption of physical reality. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Lefebvre, H. (2004). Rhythmanalysis: Space, time, and everyday life. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  16. Liggett, H. (2003). Urban encounters. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  17. Marshall, C. (2004, September 14). Bid to decriminalize prostitution in Berkeley. New York Times.Google Scholar
  18. McAndrews, C., Flórez, J., & Deakin, E. (2006). Views of the street: Using community surveys and focus groups to inform context-sensitive design. Transportation record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1981.Google Scholar
  19. Pink, S. (2007). Doing visual ethnography. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  20. Riis, J. (1890). How the other half lives: Studies among the tenements of New York. New York: Scribner.Google Scholar
  21. Sandercock, L. (2003). Cosmopolis II: Mongrel cities of the 21st Century. New York and London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  22. Scott, J. C. (1998). Seeing like a state: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Scott, M. (1969). American city planning since 1890. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  24. Solnit, R. (2003). River of shadows: Eadweard Muybridge and the technological wild West. New York: Penguin Putnam.Google Scholar
  25. Toulmin, V. (2008). Electric Edwardians: The films of Mitchell and Kenyon. London: British Film Institute.Google Scholar
  26. Whyte W. H. (1980). The social life of small urban spaces. New York: Conservation Foundation.Google Scholar
  27. Wilson, E. (1991). The Sphinx in the city: Urban life, the control of disorder, and women. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Yale School of ArchitectureNew HavenUSA

Personalised recommendations