Abstract
Planners have often been criticized for expert-driven practice. “Professional planners, with their urgent need to act, move too quickly to models and inventories” and “tend to screen out the connections between the physical environment and its social meaning” (Tuan, 1977 and Appleyard 1979 in Mehrhoff, 1999, p. 61). Yet citizens perceive their communities as natural, economic and social entities, as well as spatial environments that are sources of delight, displeasure or despair (Mehrhoff, 1999). When processes of change are driven by experts, planning focuses too much on issues of land use and public finance, often ignoring environmental and design issues because they are difficult to quantify. When citizens are given an opportunity to engage in participatory planning and design, expert-driven planners are often at a loss as to how to proceed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Arnstein, S. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 34, 216–224.
Blake, S. dir. (2006a). Detroit collaborative design center. . .amplifying the diminished voice. Winnipeg (DVD): Sou International Ltd.
Blake, S. (2006b). Knowledge, skills and attitudes needed by community designers. Plan Canada, 11(12), 43–45.
Comerio, M. C. (1984). Community design: Idealism and entrepreneurship. Architecture and Planning Research, 1, 227–243.
Cuff, D. (1991). Architecture: The story of practice. Boston: MIT.
De Carlo, G. (2005). Architecture’s public. In P. B. Jones, D. Petrescu, & J. Till (Eds.), Architecture and participation. Oxford: Spon.
Francis, M. (1983, Fall). Community design. Journal of Architectural Education, 14–19.
Hester, R. T. (1983). Process can be style: Participation and conservation in landscape architecture. Landscape Architecture, 5, 49–55.
Hochachka, G. (2005). Developing sustainability, developing the self: An integral approach to international and community development. Victoria: University of Victoria.
Mehrhoff, A. W. (1999). Community design: A team approach to dynamic community systems. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Peikoff, L. (1993). Afterword. In A. Rand (1943) (Ed.), The fountainhead. New York: Signet.
Sanoff, H. (2006). Personal interview.
Sanoff, H. (2000). Community participation methods in design and planning. New York: Wiley.
Till, J. (2005). The negotiation of hope. In P. B. Jones, Petrescu D, & J. Till (Eds.), Architecture and participation. Oxford: Spon.
Towers, G. (1995). Building democracy: Community architecture in the inner cities. London: UCL.
Wates, N. & Knevitt, C. (1987). Community architecture: How people are creating their own environment. Sulfolk: Penguin.
Worth, S. (1981). Studying visual communication. Philadelphia: Pennsylvania Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Blake, S. (2010). Participatory Design and Howard Roark: The Story of the Detroit Collaborative Design Center. In: Sandercock, L., Attili, G. (eds) Multimedia Explorations in Urban Policy and Planning. Urban and Landscape Perspectives, vol 7. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3209-6_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3209-6_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-3208-9
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-3209-6
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)